Rahul Mathew, Kaushik J, Sailesh I S Kumar, Shakthiyan Gopal, Ajeet Saoji, Priyanka Perumal, Shoraf P
{"title":"Minimally invasive versus open surgery among colorectal cancer patients.","authors":"Rahul Mathew, Kaushik J, Sailesh I S Kumar, Shakthiyan Gopal, Ajeet Saoji, Priyanka Perumal, Shoraf P","doi":"10.6026/973206300211635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally Invasive Surgery has become an acceptable substitute for Open Surgery in the management of colorectal cancer, with the claimed benefits of reduced morbidity and quicker recovery. Therefore it is of interest to compare the clinical and oncological results of MIS and OS among 200 patients with colorectal cancer over five years. The patients were evaluated for operative time, complications, hospital stay and disease-free survival. MIS has been demonstrated to be linked to markedly reduced stays in hospital (6 vs. 10 days) and decreased complication rates (15% vs. 25%) versus Open Surgery with similar oncologic outcomes: clearance of margins, as well as five-year disease- free survival, p > 0.05. Thus, data support MIS as an effective and safe method within suitably chosen patients with cancer of the colon and rectum, with advantage at recovery duration and complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8962,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformation","volume":"21 6","pages":"1635-1638"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300211635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Minimally Invasive Surgery has become an acceptable substitute for Open Surgery in the management of colorectal cancer, with the claimed benefits of reduced morbidity and quicker recovery. Therefore it is of interest to compare the clinical and oncological results of MIS and OS among 200 patients with colorectal cancer over five years. The patients were evaluated for operative time, complications, hospital stay and disease-free survival. MIS has been demonstrated to be linked to markedly reduced stays in hospital (6 vs. 10 days) and decreased complication rates (15% vs. 25%) versus Open Surgery with similar oncologic outcomes: clearance of margins, as well as five-year disease- free survival, p > 0.05. Thus, data support MIS as an effective and safe method within suitably chosen patients with cancer of the colon and rectum, with advantage at recovery duration and complications.
在结直肠癌的治疗中,微创手术已经成为开放手术的一种可接受的替代品,其声称的好处是降低发病率和更快的恢复。因此,比较200例结直肠癌患者5年内MIS和OS的临床和肿瘤学结果是有意义的。评估患者的手术时间、并发症、住院时间和无病生存期。与开放手术相比,MIS已被证明可显著缩短住院时间(6天vs 10天)和降低并发症发生率(15% vs 25%),具有相似的肿瘤预后:切缘清除率,以及5年无病生存率(p >.05)。因此,数据支持MIS在适当选择的结肠癌和直肠癌患者中作为一种有效和安全的方法,在恢复时间和并发症方面具有优势。