{"title":"Tracing Prescribed Knowledge Flows in Wastewater Management Policies: An AI-Assisted, Governmentality-Informed Framework with Insights from Indonesia.","authors":"Roald Niels Christiaan Leeuwerik","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02277-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Policy documents allow for the study of prescribed knowledge flows in decision-making processes. Although policy documents have been analyzed previously in wastewater studies, a more systematic approach to analyze prescribed knowledge flows remains to be developed. Guided by governmentality, this article proposes a framework to investigate prescribed knowledge flows and gain insights into intended stakeholder roles, techniques and technologies used to govern, as well as the nature of knowledge that should be exchanged. The framework is built upon the new possibilities by Artificial Intelligence (AI) by developing a prompt to identify prescribed knowledge flows. Building on an analysis of Indonesian policies, the study presented in this paper illustrates how a decentralized and community-led approach for wastewater management is planned. The approach intends to drive behavioral change and community-led management initiatives, thereby protecting public health and environmental quality. However, challenges include scarce details on prescribed stakeholder roles and an incomplete operationalization of national and/or regional provisions. While verification of AI output remains necessary, AI support saves time by reducing the need for full-text reading and summarization of identified prescribed knowledge flows. The method described in this paper can be used by decision-makers to facilitate critical inquiry of policies, or by non-governmental stakeholders to better understand complex legal texts and opportunities for involvement in decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02277-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Policy documents allow for the study of prescribed knowledge flows in decision-making processes. Although policy documents have been analyzed previously in wastewater studies, a more systematic approach to analyze prescribed knowledge flows remains to be developed. Guided by governmentality, this article proposes a framework to investigate prescribed knowledge flows and gain insights into intended stakeholder roles, techniques and technologies used to govern, as well as the nature of knowledge that should be exchanged. The framework is built upon the new possibilities by Artificial Intelligence (AI) by developing a prompt to identify prescribed knowledge flows. Building on an analysis of Indonesian policies, the study presented in this paper illustrates how a decentralized and community-led approach for wastewater management is planned. The approach intends to drive behavioral change and community-led management initiatives, thereby protecting public health and environmental quality. However, challenges include scarce details on prescribed stakeholder roles and an incomplete operationalization of national and/or regional provisions. While verification of AI output remains necessary, AI support saves time by reducing the need for full-text reading and summarization of identified prescribed knowledge flows. The method described in this paper can be used by decision-makers to facilitate critical inquiry of policies, or by non-governmental stakeholders to better understand complex legal texts and opportunities for involvement in decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more.
As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.