Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Staging Classification of Pressure Injuries.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352
Ayşe Silanur Demir Üçtepe, Ahmet Emin Battal, Cevat Güleç, Eren Ergün, Ahmet Bakcaci, Ayişe Karadağ, Çiğdem Gündüz Demir Üçtepe
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Staging Classification of Pressure Injuries.","authors":"Ayşe Silanur Demir Üçtepe, Ahmet Emin Battal, Cevat Güleç, Eren Ergün, Ahmet Bakcaci, Ayişe Karadağ, Çiğdem Gündüz Demir Üçtepe","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to design an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can more accurately and objectively identify different stages of pressure injuries (PIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, the authors proposed using AI and computer vision to classify PI images by stage. To this end, the authors implemented a classification network and trained it on a set of PIs images labeled with their stages. This dataset included images from 2 different sources, namely the publicly available Pressure Injury Image Dataset (1091 images), and a private dataset from Koç University Wound Research Laboratory (AY-Lab) (572 images). All images were resized to 224×224 and normalized according to the ImageNet-1K dataset before model input. Various deep learning architectures, including ResNet18, ResNet18-Transformer Encoder Hybrid Model, and DenseNet-121, were used for training and testing. Three-fold cross-validation was used to ensure more robust training and testing. Multiple configurations were tested for each model, and the best-performing configuration was identified. Grad-CAM was applied to visualize attention areas for further evaluation of the model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3-fold cross-validation, ResNet18 outperformed all tested models, achieving an average accuracy of 76.92 ± 0.92% on the 4-class classification task. The model demonstrated the highest precision of 87.35 ± 5.54% for Stage 1 and the lowest precision of 64.72 ± 2.66% for Stage 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of using the proposed computational approach for PI staging are promising. The AI model can automate PI stage classification, making it a valuable tool for clinic experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"38 9","pages":"480-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to design an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can more accurately and objectively identify different stages of pressure injuries (PIs).

Methods: In this study, the authors proposed using AI and computer vision to classify PI images by stage. To this end, the authors implemented a classification network and trained it on a set of PIs images labeled with their stages. This dataset included images from 2 different sources, namely the publicly available Pressure Injury Image Dataset (1091 images), and a private dataset from Koç University Wound Research Laboratory (AY-Lab) (572 images). All images were resized to 224×224 and normalized according to the ImageNet-1K dataset before model input. Various deep learning architectures, including ResNet18, ResNet18-Transformer Encoder Hybrid Model, and DenseNet-121, were used for training and testing. Three-fold cross-validation was used to ensure more robust training and testing. Multiple configurations were tested for each model, and the best-performing configuration was identified. Grad-CAM was applied to visualize attention areas for further evaluation of the model results.

Results: After 3-fold cross-validation, ResNet18 outperformed all tested models, achieving an average accuracy of 76.92 ± 0.92% on the 4-class classification task. The model demonstrated the highest precision of 87.35 ± 5.54% for Stage 1 and the lowest precision of 64.72 ± 2.66% for Stage 3.

Conclusions: The results of using the proposed computational approach for PI staging are promising. The AI model can automate PI stage classification, making it a valuable tool for clinic experts.

基于人工智能的压力损伤分期分类。
目的:设计一种能够更准确、客观地识别不同阶段压力性损伤(pi)的人工智能(AI)工具。方法:本文提出采用人工智能和计算机视觉对PI图像进行分期分类。为此,作者实现了一个分类网络,并在一组标有其阶段的pi图像上进行训练。该数据集包括来自2个不同来源的图像,即公开可用的压力损伤图像数据集(1091张图像)和来自Koç大学伤口研究实验室(AY-Lab)的私人数据集(572张图像)。在模型输入之前,根据ImageNet-1K数据集将所有图像调整为224×224并进行归一化。各种深度学习架构,包括ResNet18、ResNet18-变压器编码器混合模型和DenseNet-121,被用于训练和测试。采用三重交叉验证,以确保更稳健的训练和测试。针对每个模型测试了多个配置,并确定了性能最佳的配置。应用Grad-CAM可视化注意区域,以便进一步评估模型结果。结果:经过3次交叉验证,ResNet18在4类分类任务上的平均准确率为76.92±0.92%,优于所有被测模型。模型第一阶段精度最高,为87.35±5.54%;第三阶段精度最低,为64.72±2.66%。结论:使用所提出的计算方法进行PI分期的结果是有希望的。人工智能模型可以自动进行PI阶段分类,使其成为临床专家的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信