Ayşe Silanur Demir Üçtepe, Ahmet Emin Battal, Cevat Güleç, Eren Ergün, Ahmet Bakcaci, Ayişe Karadağ, Çiğdem Gündüz Demir Üçtepe
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Staging Classification of Pressure Injuries.","authors":"Ayşe Silanur Demir Üçtepe, Ahmet Emin Battal, Cevat Güleç, Eren Ergün, Ahmet Bakcaci, Ayişe Karadağ, Çiğdem Gündüz Demir Üçtepe","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to design an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can more accurately and objectively identify different stages of pressure injuries (PIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, the authors proposed using AI and computer vision to classify PI images by stage. To this end, the authors implemented a classification network and trained it on a set of PIs images labeled with their stages. This dataset included images from 2 different sources, namely the publicly available Pressure Injury Image Dataset (1091 images), and a private dataset from Koç University Wound Research Laboratory (AY-Lab) (572 images). All images were resized to 224×224 and normalized according to the ImageNet-1K dataset before model input. Various deep learning architectures, including ResNet18, ResNet18-Transformer Encoder Hybrid Model, and DenseNet-121, were used for training and testing. Three-fold cross-validation was used to ensure more robust training and testing. Multiple configurations were tested for each model, and the best-performing configuration was identified. Grad-CAM was applied to visualize attention areas for further evaluation of the model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 3-fold cross-validation, ResNet18 outperformed all tested models, achieving an average accuracy of 76.92 ± 0.92% on the 4-class classification task. The model demonstrated the highest precision of 87.35 ± 5.54% for Stage 1 and the lowest precision of 64.72 ± 2.66% for Stage 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of using the proposed computational approach for PI staging are promising. The AI model can automate PI stage classification, making it a valuable tool for clinic experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"38 9","pages":"480-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to design an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that can more accurately and objectively identify different stages of pressure injuries (PIs).
Methods: In this study, the authors proposed using AI and computer vision to classify PI images by stage. To this end, the authors implemented a classification network and trained it on a set of PIs images labeled with their stages. This dataset included images from 2 different sources, namely the publicly available Pressure Injury Image Dataset (1091 images), and a private dataset from Koç University Wound Research Laboratory (AY-Lab) (572 images). All images were resized to 224×224 and normalized according to the ImageNet-1K dataset before model input. Various deep learning architectures, including ResNet18, ResNet18-Transformer Encoder Hybrid Model, and DenseNet-121, were used for training and testing. Three-fold cross-validation was used to ensure more robust training and testing. Multiple configurations were tested for each model, and the best-performing configuration was identified. Grad-CAM was applied to visualize attention areas for further evaluation of the model results.
Results: After 3-fold cross-validation, ResNet18 outperformed all tested models, achieving an average accuracy of 76.92 ± 0.92% on the 4-class classification task. The model demonstrated the highest precision of 87.35 ± 5.54% for Stage 1 and the lowest precision of 64.72 ± 2.66% for Stage 3.
Conclusions: The results of using the proposed computational approach for PI staging are promising. The AI model can automate PI stage classification, making it a valuable tool for clinic experts.
期刊介绍:
A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.