Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee® MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2025-08-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/QODA6396
Ken Nakahara, Daisuke Obinata, Sho Hashimoto, Kazuki Ohashi, Yuki Inagaki, Tsuyoshi Yoshizawa, Junichi Mochida, Kenya Yamaguchi, Satoru Takahashi
{"title":"Enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted and non-targeted regions using BiopSee<sup>®</sup> MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy.","authors":"Ken Nakahara, Daisuke Obinata, Sho Hashimoto, Kazuki Ohashi, Yuki Inagaki, Tsuyoshi Yoshizawa, Junichi Mochida, Kenya Yamaguchi, Satoru Takahashi","doi":"10.62347/QODA6396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee<sup>®</sup> system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee<sup>®</sup> system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"13 4","pages":"265-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/QODA6396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the cancer detection profile of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies (fusion biopsy) using the BiopSee® system in patients assessed with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1, focusing on clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection in regions of interest (ROI) and non-ROI areas.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients who underwent fusion biopsy between February and November 2024. Detection rates of csPCa (grade group ≥ 2) were compared between the ROI and non-ROI regions, and clinical and biopsy characteristics were compared between patients with and without csPCa. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of csPCa.

Results: The median patient age was 74 years, with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 8.93 ng/mL. The csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in the ROI than in the non-ROI regions (61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012). Across the cohort, PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions were more common than PI-RADS 3 lesions. A higher PI-RADS score (4 or 5) was identified as a significant predictor of csPCa detection (odds ratio 5.14, P = 0.034), whereas age, PSA, number of ROIs, and biopsy core numbers were not significant predictors.

Conclusions: Fusion biopsy using the BiopSee® system achieved a high csPCa detection rate in targeted ROIs, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, while also highlighting the importance of combining systematic biopsy with targeted approaches because of the substantial proportion of csPCa detected in non-ROI regions.

使用BiopSee®MRI/超声融合活检增强检测靶向和非靶向区域的临床显著性前列腺癌。
目的:本研究评估了使用BiopSee®系统在前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS) 2.1版评估的患者中使用磁共振成像/经直肠超声融合引导活检(融合活检)的癌症检测概况,重点关注感兴趣区域(ROI)和非ROI区域的临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)检测。方法:回顾性分析2024年2月至11月间行融合活检的59例患者。比较ROI区和非ROI区csPCa检出率(分级组≥2),比较有csPCa和无csPCa患者的临床和活检特征。采用单因素logistic回归分析确定csPCa的预测因素。结果:患者中位年龄为74岁,中位前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平为8.93 ng/mL。csPCa在ROI区域的检出率明显高于non-ROI区域(61% vs. 44%, P = 0.012)。在整个队列中,PI-RADS 4和5病变比PI-RADS 3病变更常见。较高的PI-RADS评分(4或5)被认为是csPCa检测的重要预测因子(优势比5.14,P = 0.034),而年龄、PSA、roi数量和活检核心数量不是显著预测因子。结论:使用BiopSee®系统的融合活检在靶向roi中获得了很高的csPCa检出率,特别是对于PI-RADS 4和5病变,同时也强调了将系统活检与靶向方法相结合的重要性,因为在非roi区域检测到相当大比例的csPCa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信