Use of Smartphone Photography for Clinical Decision-Making in Wound Surgery: Is It Reliable?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342
Ravit Yanko, Rachel Biesse, Gon Shoham, Riham Kheir, Orel Govrin-Yehudain, Zohar Golan, David Leshem, Yoav Barnea, Eyal Gur, Ehud Fliss
{"title":"Use of Smartphone Photography for Clinical Decision-Making in Wound Surgery: Is It Reliable?","authors":"Ravit Yanko, Rachel Biesse, Gon Shoham, Riham Kheir, Orel Govrin-Yehudain, Zohar Golan, David Leshem, Yoav Barnea, Eyal Gur, Ehud Fliss","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphone photography may play a role in various aspects of clinical practice in wound surgery. Its accuracy as a tool for wound assessment and clinical decision-making is yet to be proven. Moreover, data regarding the magnitude of its use in practice are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven board-certified plastic surgeons performed 79 wound observations and completed a questionnaire regarding wound properties and decisions regarding management. Wounds were photographed using smartphones at the time of initial wound observation. At least 3 months later, photographs of the wounds were anonymously presented to the same surgeons who completed the questionnaires again. Statistical analysis was used to compare the results. In addition, an online survey was used to assess the magnitude and manner of smartphone photography use among plastic surgeons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison of bedside and photographic wound evaluation found no statistically significant differences in nearly all descriptive wound parameters and aspects of clinical decision-making. Statistically significant differences were found for periwound subcutaneous space assessment (P=.02) and recommendation for operative wound closure (P=.035). Seventy-four plastic surgeons replied to the online survey, and 93% of them stated that they use smartphone photography in their daily practice, with the majority using it equally for patient follow-up, consulting other physicians, and communication with patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smartphone photography seems to play a major role in present-day clinical practice. According to the findings of this study, assessment of wounds via smartphone photography can be safely used as an adjunct for clinical decision-making when used as a consultation aid between wound surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"38 9","pages":"E98-E106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Smartphone photography may play a role in various aspects of clinical practice in wound surgery. Its accuracy as a tool for wound assessment and clinical decision-making is yet to be proven. Moreover, data regarding the magnitude of its use in practice are lacking.

Methods: Eleven board-certified plastic surgeons performed 79 wound observations and completed a questionnaire regarding wound properties and decisions regarding management. Wounds were photographed using smartphones at the time of initial wound observation. At least 3 months later, photographs of the wounds were anonymously presented to the same surgeons who completed the questionnaires again. Statistical analysis was used to compare the results. In addition, an online survey was used to assess the magnitude and manner of smartphone photography use among plastic surgeons.

Results: Comparison of bedside and photographic wound evaluation found no statistically significant differences in nearly all descriptive wound parameters and aspects of clinical decision-making. Statistically significant differences were found for periwound subcutaneous space assessment (P=.02) and recommendation for operative wound closure (P=.035). Seventy-four plastic surgeons replied to the online survey, and 93% of them stated that they use smartphone photography in their daily practice, with the majority using it equally for patient follow-up, consulting other physicians, and communication with patients.

Conclusions: Smartphone photography seems to play a major role in present-day clinical practice. According to the findings of this study, assessment of wounds via smartphone photography can be safely used as an adjunct for clinical decision-making when used as a consultation aid between wound surgeons.

智能手机摄影在伤口手术临床决策中的应用:可靠吗?
背景:智能手机摄影可以在伤口外科临床实践的各个方面发挥作用。它作为伤口评估和临床决策工具的准确性尚未得到证实。此外,缺乏有关其实际使用程度的数据。方法:11名执业整形外科医生进行了79次伤口观察,并完成了关于伤口性质和处理决策的问卷调查。在最初观察伤口时,使用智能手机拍摄伤口。至少3个月后,伤口的照片被匿名提供给再次完成问卷调查的同一位外科医生。采用统计学方法对结果进行比较。此外,一项在线调查用于评估整形外科医生使用智能手机拍照的程度和方式。结果:比较床边和摄影伤口评估发现,几乎所有描述性伤口参数和临床决策方面没有统计学上的显着差异。两组在创面周围皮下间隙评估(P= 0.02)和手术创面闭合推荐(P= 0.035)方面差异有统计学意义。74名整形外科医生回应了这项在线调查,其中93%的人表示,他们在日常手术中使用智能手机拍照,其中大多数人将其用于患者随访、咨询其他医生以及与患者沟通。结论:智能手机摄影似乎在当今的临床实践中发挥了重要作用。根据这项研究的结果,通过智能手机摄影来评估伤口,可以安全地作为临床决策的辅助手段,作为伤口外科医生之间的咨询辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信