Pleural fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: a clinical review.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jose Diego Santotoribio
{"title":"Pleural fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: a clinical review.","authors":"Jose Diego Santotoribio","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2559697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Initial pleural fluid analysis is a fundamental step in the evaluation of suspected malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Most MPEs present as exudates, often hemorrhagic, with mononuclear cell predominance. Basic biochemical parameters-glucose, total protein, LDH, ADA, and pH-help distinguish MPE from other causes and offer prognostic information. Low glucose and pH, and elevated LDH, are associated with higher tumor burden and poorer outcomes. Flow cytometry can detect high-fluorescence cells suggestive of malignancy, while additional markers like CRP, cholesterol, amylase, and lipids provide complementary diagnostic value, especially when interpreted alongside tumor markers (TMs). Among TMs in pleural fluid, CEA is the most validated and widely used, showing high specificity for MPE. Others-such as CA 15.3, CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CA 19.9, NSE, and HE4-offer variable sensitivity and specificity depending on tumor type and clinical context. False positives can occur in benign or inflammatory conditions, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation. Other cancer biomarkers in pleural fluid-such as VEGF, Apolipoprotein E, calprotectin, endostatin, and homocysteine-may enhance diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. VEGF and endostatin reflect tumor angiogenesis and may also serve as therapeutic targets, while homocysteine shows promise in detecting MPEs not identified by conventional TMs. Multimarker strategies significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. Combinations of two pleural fluid TMs, such as CEA with CA 15.3, or diagnostic models like the MPER score (CEA + homocysteine), have shown excellent performance. Panels with three or more markers, including inflammatory or metabolic biomarkers (ADA, CRP, and %polymorphonuclear leukocytes) further enhance sensitivity and specificity. Molecular analysis in pleural fluid has emerged as a promising approach for the diagnosis of MPE, enabling the detection of mRNA, DNA methylation patterns, lncRNAs, miRNAs, or circulating tumor DNA. Although these biomarkers have demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, they are not yet implemented in routine clinical practice, and most studies have primarily focused on MPE due to lung cancer. In malignant pleural mesothelioma, where cytology has limited sensitivity, the most extensively investigated markers in pleural fluid are mesothelin and fibulin-3. Among conventional tumor markers, the pleural fluid CYFRA 21-1/CEA ratio has shown high diagnostic accuracy, further enhanced when combined with mesothelin. Pleural fluid fibulin-3 has also been identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2559697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Initial pleural fluid analysis is a fundamental step in the evaluation of suspected malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Most MPEs present as exudates, often hemorrhagic, with mononuclear cell predominance. Basic biochemical parameters-glucose, total protein, LDH, ADA, and pH-help distinguish MPE from other causes and offer prognostic information. Low glucose and pH, and elevated LDH, are associated with higher tumor burden and poorer outcomes. Flow cytometry can detect high-fluorescence cells suggestive of malignancy, while additional markers like CRP, cholesterol, amylase, and lipids provide complementary diagnostic value, especially when interpreted alongside tumor markers (TMs). Among TMs in pleural fluid, CEA is the most validated and widely used, showing high specificity for MPE. Others-such as CA 15.3, CYFRA 21-1, CA 125, CA 19.9, NSE, and HE4-offer variable sensitivity and specificity depending on tumor type and clinical context. False positives can occur in benign or inflammatory conditions, emphasizing the need for cautious interpretation. Other cancer biomarkers in pleural fluid-such as VEGF, Apolipoprotein E, calprotectin, endostatin, and homocysteine-may enhance diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. VEGF and endostatin reflect tumor angiogenesis and may also serve as therapeutic targets, while homocysteine shows promise in detecting MPEs not identified by conventional TMs. Multimarker strategies significantly improve diagnostic accuracy. Combinations of two pleural fluid TMs, such as CEA with CA 15.3, or diagnostic models like the MPER score (CEA + homocysteine), have shown excellent performance. Panels with three or more markers, including inflammatory or metabolic biomarkers (ADA, CRP, and %polymorphonuclear leukocytes) further enhance sensitivity and specificity. Molecular analysis in pleural fluid has emerged as a promising approach for the diagnosis of MPE, enabling the detection of mRNA, DNA methylation patterns, lncRNAs, miRNAs, or circulating tumor DNA. Although these biomarkers have demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, they are not yet implemented in routine clinical practice, and most studies have primarily focused on MPE due to lung cancer. In malignant pleural mesothelioma, where cytology has limited sensitivity, the most extensively investigated markers in pleural fluid are mesothelin and fibulin-3. Among conventional tumor markers, the pleural fluid CYFRA 21-1/CEA ratio has shown high diagnostic accuracy, further enhanced when combined with mesothelin. Pleural fluid fibulin-3 has also been identified as an independent prognostic factor for survival.

恶性胸腔积液诊断和治疗的胸腔液体生物标志物:临床综述
初步胸腔积液分析是评估疑似恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的基本步骤。多数MPEs表现为渗出物,常为出血性,以单核细胞为主。基本生化参数-葡萄糖,总蛋白,LDH, ADA和ph -有助于区分MPE与其他原因,并提供预后信息。低血糖和pH值以及LDH升高与较高的肿瘤负荷和较差的预后相关。流式细胞术可以检测提示恶性肿瘤的高荧光细胞,而其他标志物如CRP、胆固醇、淀粉酶和脂质提供补充诊断价值,特别是当与肿瘤标志物(TMs)一起解释时。在胸膜液的TMs中,CEA是最有效和应用最广泛的,对MPE有很高的特异性。其他如CA 15.3、CYFRA 21-1、CA 125、CA 19.9、NSE和he4的敏感性和特异性取决于肿瘤类型和临床情况。假阳性可能发生在良性或炎症条件下,强调需要谨慎解释。胸膜液中的其他癌症生物标志物——如VEGF、载脂蛋白E、钙保护蛋白、内皮抑素和同型半胱氨酸——可能增强诊断和预后能力。VEGF和内皮抑素反映肿瘤血管生成,也可能作为治疗靶点,而同型半胱氨酸有望检测常规TMs无法识别的mps。多标记策略显著提高诊断准确性。两种胸膜液TMs的联合应用,如CEA + CA 15.3,或MPER评分(CEA +同型半胱氨酸)等诊断模型均表现优异。具有三种或更多标记物(包括炎症或代谢生物标记物(ADA、CRP和%多形核白细胞)的组进一步提高了敏感性和特异性。胸膜液分子分析已成为MPE诊断的一种很有前途的方法,可以检测mRNA、DNA甲基化模式、lncrna、mirna或循环肿瘤DNA。尽管这些生物标志物已经证明了良好的诊断准确性,但它们尚未在常规临床实践中得到应用,而且大多数研究主要集中在肺癌引起的MPE上。在细胞学敏感性有限的恶性胸膜间皮瘤中,胸膜液中最广泛研究的标志物是间皮素和纤维蛋白-3。在常规肿瘤标志物中,胸膜液CYFRA 21-1/CEA比值具有较高的诊断准确性,联合间皮素可进一步提高诊断准确性。胸膜液纤维蛋白-3也被确定为生存的独立预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信