Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Trenton M Haltom, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Allison Jaure, Kevin F Erickson
{"title":"Nephrologist Perspectives on Using Telemedicine During In-Center Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Trenton M Haltom, Susie Q Lew, Wolfgang C Winkelmayer, Glenn M Chertow, Allison Jaure, Kevin F Erickson","doi":"10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale & objective: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States (US) government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology care providers (nephrologists and affiliated advanced practice providers) across the US could use telemedicine in lieu of face-to-face visits to deliver care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. In this study, we describe perspectives and experiences of nephrologists using telemedicine to deliver in-center hemodialysis care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative research study.</p><p><strong>Setting & participants: </strong>Nephrologists in three health systems who used telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Analytical approach: </strong>We conducted 16 semi-structured telephone interviews. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified five themes and respective subthemes: maintaining safety and quality of care (making up missed appointments, fostering continuity of care, addressing urgent medical issues); maximizing efficiency (reducing nephrologist's travel burden, allowing for flexibility); operational complexities (dependence on facility resources; challenges coordinating with facility staff; modifying visit duration/length); diminished depth of clinical encounters (excess formality, constrained communication, incomplete physical exams); supporting confidence in telemedicine (complementing in-person care, accounting for patient preferences, requiring reimbursement).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The transferability of the findings outside of an urban academic setting is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although nephrologists encountered operational (both technical and personal level) challenges such as communication constraints when using telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care, they reported improvements in aspects of care quality and enhanced efficiency. These findings inform the potential use of a hybrid in-center hemodialysis care delivery model in which telemedicine supplements in-person visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7419,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Kidney Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2025.08.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & objective: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the United States (US) government expanded originating telemedicine sites to include outpatient dialysis units. For the first time, nephrology care providers (nephrologists and affiliated advanced practice providers) across the US could use telemedicine in lieu of face-to-face visits to deliver care for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. In this study, we describe perspectives and experiences of nephrologists using telemedicine to deliver in-center hemodialysis care.

Study design: Qualitative research study.

Setting & participants: Nephrologists in three health systems who used telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Analytical approach: We conducted 16 semi-structured telephone interviews. Transcripts were thematically analyzed.

Results: We identified five themes and respective subthemes: maintaining safety and quality of care (making up missed appointments, fostering continuity of care, addressing urgent medical issues); maximizing efficiency (reducing nephrologist's travel burden, allowing for flexibility); operational complexities (dependence on facility resources; challenges coordinating with facility staff; modifying visit duration/length); diminished depth of clinical encounters (excess formality, constrained communication, incomplete physical exams); supporting confidence in telemedicine (complementing in-person care, accounting for patient preferences, requiring reimbursement).

Limitations: The transferability of the findings outside of an urban academic setting is uncertain.

Conclusion: Although nephrologists encountered operational (both technical and personal level) challenges such as communication constraints when using telemedicine for in-center hemodialysis care, they reported improvements in aspects of care quality and enhanced efficiency. These findings inform the potential use of a hybrid in-center hemodialysis care delivery model in which telemedicine supplements in-person visits.

肾内科医生在中心血液透析中使用远程医疗的观点:一项定性研究。
理由和目的:在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,美国政府扩大了原始远程医疗站点,将门诊透析单元包括在内。美国各地的肾病护理提供者(肾病学家和附属高级实践提供者)首次可以使用远程医疗代替面对面访问,为接受中心血液透析的患者提供护理。在本研究中,我们描述了肾病学家使用远程医疗提供中心血液透析护理的观点和经验。研究设计:定性研究。背景和参与者:在COVID-19大流行期间使用远程医疗进行中心血液透析的三个卫生系统的肾病学家。分析方法:我们进行了16次半结构化电话访谈。对转录本进行主题分析。结果:我们确定了五个主题和各自的子主题:维护安全和护理质量(弥补错过的预约,促进护理的连续性,解决紧急医疗问题);效率最大化(减少肾病专家的旅行负担,允许灵活性);操作复杂性(对设施资源的依赖;与设施工作人员协调的挑战;修改访问时间/长度);临床接触深度减少(过于拘谨、沟通受限、体检不完整);支持对远程医疗的信心(补充现场护理、考虑患者偏好、要求报销)。局限性:研究结果在城市学术环境之外的可转移性是不确定的。结论:尽管肾病学家在使用远程医疗进行中心血液透析护理时遇到了通信限制等操作(技术和个人层面)挑战,但他们报告了在护理质量和效率方面的改进。这些发现提示了一种混合中心血液透析护理交付模式的潜在用途,在这种模式中,远程医疗补充了亲自就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
American Journal of Kidney Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
732
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD), the National Kidney Foundation's official journal, is globally recognized for its leadership in clinical nephrology content. Monthly, AJKD publishes original investigations on kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis therapies, and kidney transplantation. Rigorous peer-review, statistical scrutiny, and a structured format characterize the publication process. Each issue includes case reports unveiling new diseases and potential therapeutic strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信