{"title":"Hemodynamic Ramp Test in Cardiogenic Shock Supported by Microaxial Flow Pump: Protocol Description, Feasibility, and Hemodynamic Response.","authors":"Yuki Ikeda, Saeko Iikura, Shohei Nakahara, Yu Takigami, Yuko Eda, Yuichiro Iida, Takeru Nabeta, Shunsuke Ishii, Nobuhiro Sato, Junya Ako","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-based protocols for microaxial flow pump (MAFP) weaning remain limited. This study aimed to standardize the ramp test for MAFP and evaluate its feasibility and associated hemodynamic trajectories. In this single-center prospective study, we developed and implemented an Impella ramp test in 54 cardiogenic shock patients who met pretest stability criteria. Forty-six patients (85%) completed the full protocol, while the test was terminated in eight patients according to predefined safety criteria (significant disturbances in arterial pressure or pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP], or sustained arrhythmias), with prompt recovery observed upon returning to the baseline P-level. Under continuous hemodynamic monitoring via a pulmonary artery catheter, the Impella P-level was reduced stepwise from P8 to P2 at 5 minute intervals, while systemic arterial pulse pressure (SAPP), cardiac power output (CPO), and PAWP were recorded. In the overall cohort, SAPP increased by 12.2 mm Hg, CPO decreased by 0.09 W, and PAWP increased by 2.5 mm Hg. Patients supported with Impella 5.5 experienced a greater reduction in flow (-2.8 vs. -1.4 L/minute) and more pronounced hemodynamic changes compared to those with Impella CP. The Impella ramp test is feasible and safe, providing quantitative hemodynamic insights that may inform individualized clinical decision-making and MAFP weaning strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evidence-based protocols for microaxial flow pump (MAFP) weaning remain limited. This study aimed to standardize the ramp test for MAFP and evaluate its feasibility and associated hemodynamic trajectories. In this single-center prospective study, we developed and implemented an Impella ramp test in 54 cardiogenic shock patients who met pretest stability criteria. Forty-six patients (85%) completed the full protocol, while the test was terminated in eight patients according to predefined safety criteria (significant disturbances in arterial pressure or pulmonary artery wedge pressure [PAWP], or sustained arrhythmias), with prompt recovery observed upon returning to the baseline P-level. Under continuous hemodynamic monitoring via a pulmonary artery catheter, the Impella P-level was reduced stepwise from P8 to P2 at 5 minute intervals, while systemic arterial pulse pressure (SAPP), cardiac power output (CPO), and PAWP were recorded. In the overall cohort, SAPP increased by 12.2 mm Hg, CPO decreased by 0.09 W, and PAWP increased by 2.5 mm Hg. Patients supported with Impella 5.5 experienced a greater reduction in flow (-2.8 vs. -1.4 L/minute) and more pronounced hemodynamic changes compared to those with Impella CP. The Impella ramp test is feasible and safe, providing quantitative hemodynamic insights that may inform individualized clinical decision-making and MAFP weaning strategies.
基于证据的微轴流泵(MAFP)脱机方案仍然有限。本研究旨在规范MAFP的斜坡试验,并评估其可行性和相关的血流动力学轨迹。在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,我们在54名符合试验前稳定性标准的心源性休克患者中开发并实施了Impella斜坡试验。46名患者(85%)完成了完整的方案,而8名患者根据预先确定的安全标准(动脉压或肺动脉楔压[PAWP]明显紊乱,或持续心律失常)终止了试验,在恢复到基线p水平后观察到迅速恢复。在肺动脉导管连续血流动力学监测下,每隔5分钟将Impella p水平由P8逐步降至P2,同时记录全身动脉脉压(SAPP)、心功率输出(CPO)和paap。在整个队列中,SAPP增加了12.2 mm Hg, CPO减少了0.09 W, paap增加了2.5 mm Hg。与Impella CP相比,Impella 5.5患者的血流减少幅度更大(-2.8 vs -1.4 L/分钟),血流动力学变化更明显。Impella斜坡试验是可行和安全的,可以提供定量的血流动力学见解,可以为个性化的临床决策和MAFP断奶策略提供信息。
期刊介绍:
ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world.
The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.