Inclusion of the Right Ventricular Muscle Bundle During Interventricular Septal Measurement Improves Diagnostic Accuracy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Daniel M. Spevack, Pragya Ranjan, Yeraz Khachatoorian, Michael Broker, Chan Woo Kim, Kerry Nevin, Mala Sharma, Divya Malhotra, Srihari Naidu
{"title":"Inclusion of the Right Ventricular Muscle Bundle During Interventricular Septal Measurement Improves Diagnostic Accuracy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy","authors":"Daniel M. Spevack, Pragya Ranjan, Yeraz Khachatoorian, Michael Broker, Chan Woo Kim, Kerry Nevin, Mala Sharma, Divya Malhotra, Srihari Naidu","doi":"10.1111/echo.70299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Measurement of the interventricular septum (IVS) is a key diagnostic and prognostic parameter in the evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Right ventricular muscle bundles (RVMB) that parallel the IVS complicate septal measurement on both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Current guideline statements reference left ventricular wall thickness measurements greater than or equal to 15 mm as part of the diagnostic criteria for HCM. The medical literature lacks published data on the impact of including RVMB as part of the IVS measurement and its influence on diagnostic accuracy for HCM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We measured the IVS and RVMB separately on echocardiography in 97 consecutive subjects referred for both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of the initial evaluation for HCM. Subjects were categorized as having or not having HCM based on current practice guidelines. Patients with HCM were sub-categorized as having septal involvement (HCM-Sep) or primarily apical hypertrophy (HCM-Ap). This was done because subjects with obvious HCM-Ap could be diagnosed with HCM irrespective of IVS thickness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to subjects who did not have HCM, those with HCM-Sep had both increased IVS (15.4 ± 2.7 vs. 9.8 ± 1.9 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and RVMB thickness (5.2 ± 3.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.9 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the whole study group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for HCM was higher (0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75, 0.91]) when the RVMB was included in the IVS measurement compared to when it was excluded (0.75 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.81]). When the subjects with HCM-Ap were excluded, the area under the ROC curve for HCM was higher (0.94 [95% CI: 0.89, 0.99]) when the RVMB was included in the IVS measurement compared to when it was excluded (0.82 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.89]). The number of subjects classified correctly for HCM improved from 78% to 94% when the RVMB was included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Inclusion of the RVMB in the measurement of IVS thickness on echocardiography may improve overall diagnostic accuracy for HCM. In addition, RVMB thickness is increased and is more often visible on parasternal long-axis imaging in subjects with HCM, consistent with being part of the HCM pathology. This is particularly true in those with HCM-Sep. These data have implications for the standardization of echocardiographic and MRI reporting in HCM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Measurement of the interventricular septum (IVS) is a key diagnostic and prognostic parameter in the evaluation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Right ventricular muscle bundles (RVMB) that parallel the IVS complicate septal measurement on both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Current guideline statements reference left ventricular wall thickness measurements greater than or equal to 15 mm as part of the diagnostic criteria for HCM. The medical literature lacks published data on the impact of including RVMB as part of the IVS measurement and its influence on diagnostic accuracy for HCM.
Methods
We measured the IVS and RVMB separately on echocardiography in 97 consecutive subjects referred for both echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of the initial evaluation for HCM. Subjects were categorized as having or not having HCM based on current practice guidelines. Patients with HCM were sub-categorized as having septal involvement (HCM-Sep) or primarily apical hypertrophy (HCM-Ap). This was done because subjects with obvious HCM-Ap could be diagnosed with HCM irrespective of IVS thickness.
Results
Compared to subjects who did not have HCM, those with HCM-Sep had both increased IVS (15.4 ± 2.7 vs. 9.8 ± 1.9 mm, p < 0.001) and RVMB thickness (5.2 ± 3.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.9 mm, p < 0.001). In the whole study group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for HCM was higher (0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75, 0.91]) when the RVMB was included in the IVS measurement compared to when it was excluded (0.75 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.81]). When the subjects with HCM-Ap were excluded, the area under the ROC curve for HCM was higher (0.94 [95% CI: 0.89, 0.99]) when the RVMB was included in the IVS measurement compared to when it was excluded (0.82 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.89]). The number of subjects classified correctly for HCM improved from 78% to 94% when the RVMB was included.
Conclusions
Inclusion of the RVMB in the measurement of IVS thickness on echocardiography may improve overall diagnostic accuracy for HCM. In addition, RVMB thickness is increased and is more often visible on parasternal long-axis imaging in subjects with HCM, consistent with being part of the HCM pathology. This is particularly true in those with HCM-Sep. These data have implications for the standardization of echocardiographic and MRI reporting in HCM.
室间隔(IVS)测量是肥厚性心肌病(HCM)诊断和预后的关键参数。平行于静脉静脉的右心室肌束(RVMB)使超声心动图和磁共振成像的室间隔测量复杂化。目前的指南声明将大于或等于15mm的左心室壁厚度测量作为HCM诊断标准的一部分。医学文献缺乏将RVMB作为IVS测量的一部分的影响及其对HCM诊断准确性的影响的公开数据。方法对97例连续接受超声心动图和磁共振成像(MRI)检查的HCM患者分别进行超声心动图IVS和RVMB测量,作为HCM初步评估的一部分。根据目前的实践指南,将受试者分为有或没有HCM。HCM患者被分类为鼻中隔受累(HCM- sep)或主要根尖肥大(HCM- ap)。这样做是因为有明显HCM- ap的受试者可以被诊断为HCM,而与IVS厚度无关。结果与非HCM组相比,HCM- sep组IVS(15.4±2.7 vs. 9.8±1.9 mm, p < 0.001)和RVMB厚度(5.2±3.1 vs. 1.9±1.9 mm, p < 0.001)均增加。在整个研究组中,当RVMB被纳入IVS测量时,HCM的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(0.83[95%可信区间(CI): 0.75, 0.91])高于不纳入RVMB时(0.75[95%可信区间:0.68,0.81])。当排除HCM- ap的受试者时,与排除RVMB时(0.82 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.89])相比,将RVMB纳入IVS测量时,HCM的ROC曲线下面积更高(0.94 [95% CI: 0.89, 0.99])。当包括RVMB时,正确分类HCM的受试者数量从78%提高到94%。结论超声心动图测量IVS厚度时纳入RVMB可提高HCM的整体诊断准确性。此外,HCM患者的RVMB厚度增加,并且在胸骨旁长轴成像上更常见,这与HCM病理的一部分一致。HCM-Sep患者尤其如此。这些数据对HCM超声心动图和MRI报告的标准化具有重要意义。
期刊介绍:
Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.