Effectiveness of Gel-immersion Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy Under Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging for Esophageal Varices: A Comparison of Variceal Visibility Under Gel With White Light Imaging
{"title":"Effectiveness of Gel-immersion Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy Under Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging for Esophageal Varices: A Comparison of Variceal Visibility Under Gel With White Light Imaging","authors":"Tsunetaka Kato, Takuto Hikichi, Jun Nakamura, Minami Hashimoto, Takumi Yanagita, Mitsuru Otsuka, Daiki Nemoto, Rei Suzuki, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Hiroyuki Asama, Kentaro Sato, Hiroshi Shimizu, Kento Osawa, Rei Ohira, Masao Kobayakawa, Hiromasa Ohira","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Gel-immersion endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (GI-EIS) addresses the technical challenges in intravariceal injection for esophageal varices (EVs). However, gel accumulation may obscure the variceal morphology. Thus, we developed GI-EIS under texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) and evaluated its effectiveness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included EV patients who underwent primary prophylactic intravariceal EIS. Patients were divided into GI-EIS under TXI and conventional EIS groups. Primary outcomes were the success rates of intravariceal sclerosant injection and sclerosant injection into the afferent vessels. Secondary outcomes included the visibility score of EV morphology under TXI compared with white light imaging (WLI) during gel-immersion and luminance gradient across the EVs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 32 patients (16 in each group) were evaluated. The success rate of intravariceal sclerosant injection was comparable between GI-EIS under TXI and conventional EIS (93.8% vs. 87.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.54). However, injection into the afferent vessels was significantly more successful with GI-EIS under TXI (87.5% vs. 43.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The visibility score of the variceal morphology under TXI was consistently five points in all cases. The luminance gradient was significantly higher under TXI than under WLI (TXI vs. WLI; 0.95 vs. 0.68; <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>GI-EIS under TXI provided improved visualization of variceal morphology and enhanced success of injection into afferent vessels, suggesting that TXI may optimize the therapeutic performance of GI-EIS for EV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Gel-immersion endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (GI-EIS) addresses the technical challenges in intravariceal injection for esophageal varices (EVs). However, gel accumulation may obscure the variceal morphology. Thus, we developed GI-EIS under texture and color enhancement imaging (TXI) and evaluated its effectiveness.
Methods
This study included EV patients who underwent primary prophylactic intravariceal EIS. Patients were divided into GI-EIS under TXI and conventional EIS groups. Primary outcomes were the success rates of intravariceal sclerosant injection and sclerosant injection into the afferent vessels. Secondary outcomes included the visibility score of EV morphology under TXI compared with white light imaging (WLI) during gel-immersion and luminance gradient across the EVs.
Results
Overall, 32 patients (16 in each group) were evaluated. The success rate of intravariceal sclerosant injection was comparable between GI-EIS under TXI and conventional EIS (93.8% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.54). However, injection into the afferent vessels was significantly more successful with GI-EIS under TXI (87.5% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.01). The visibility score of the variceal morphology under TXI was consistently five points in all cases. The luminance gradient was significantly higher under TXI than under WLI (TXI vs. WLI; 0.95 vs. 0.68; p < 0.01).
Conclusion
GI-EIS under TXI provided improved visualization of variceal morphology and enhanced success of injection into afferent vessels, suggesting that TXI may optimize the therapeutic performance of GI-EIS for EV.
目的探讨凝胶浸泡内镜下注射硬化疗法(GI-EIS)治疗食管静脉曲张的技术难点。然而,凝胶积聚可能掩盖静脉曲张形态。因此,我们在纹理和颜色增强成像(TXI)下开发了GI-EIS并评估了其有效性。方法本研究纳入了接受初级预防性静脉导管内EIS治疗的EV患者。患者分为TXI下GI-EIS组和常规EIS组。主要结果是动脉导管内注射硬化剂和传入血管注射硬化剂的成功率。次要结果包括与凝胶浸泡期间白光成像(WLI)相比,TXI下EV形态的可见度评分和EV上的亮度梯度。结果共评估32例患者,每组16例。在TXI下的GI-EIS和常规EIS中,脑管内注射硬化剂的成功率相当(93.8% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.54)。然而,TXI下GI-EIS输注血管的成功率更高(87.5%比43.8%,p < 0.01)。TXI下静脉曲张形态可见性评分均为5分。TXI下的亮度梯度显著高于WLI (TXI vs. WLI; 0.95 vs. 0.68; p < 0.01)。结论TXI下GI-EIS能改善静脉曲张形态的可视化,提高输注血管的成功率,提示TXI可优化GI-EIS治疗EV的效果。