Combining eDNA and Visual Surveys Improves Detection of Reef Fishes Across Their Biogeographic Ranges

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Chloe Hayes, Ayşe Haruka Oshima Açıkbaş, Angus Mitchell, David J. Booth, Timothy Ravasi, Ivan Nagelkerken
{"title":"Combining eDNA and Visual Surveys Improves Detection of Reef Fishes Across Their Biogeographic Ranges","authors":"Chloe Hayes,&nbsp;Ayşe Haruka Oshima Açıkbaş,&nbsp;Angus Mitchell,&nbsp;David J. Booth,&nbsp;Timothy Ravasi,&nbsp;Ivan Nagelkerken","doi":"10.1111/ddi.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid shifts in marine species distributions driven by ocean warming require more effective monitoring across entire ranges to detect emerging ecological change. Traditionally, visual surveys have been used to track these distributional shifts, but they often overlook small-bodied, rare or cryptic species, potentially underestimating range changes. Environmental DNA (eDNA) bypasses these limitations, yet its effectiveness in detecting species near their range limits remains understudied.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Eastern Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We combined eDNA metabarcoding and visual surveys to assess reef fish communities across nine sites spanning a 2000-km latitudinal gradient within a global warming hotspot encapsulating tropical, subtropical and temperate reefs. Variation in detectability across methods and biogeographic ranges was also assessed at the level of functional traits (trophic guild, thermal guild and water column position).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>eDNA and visual surveys revealed different fish species compositions, potentially underestimating the extent of fish biogeographic ranges. eDNA detected 44 more unique tropical species than visual surveys across their range, and was more effective at detecting tropical carnivores, omnivores, invertivores, planktivores, detritivores and all water column positions. In contrast, visual surveys were more effective at detecting temperate carnivores, invertivores and benthic species. For tropical fishes at their cold range edge in temperate ecosystems, eDNA identified 12 unique species, including herbivores and cryptic species not previously recorded by long-term visual surveys. Contrastingly, eDNA detected 20 fewer temperate species than visual surveys across their biogeographic range and was less effective (five unique species) than visual surveys (nine unique species) at detecting temperate species at their warm trailing range in subtropical ecosystems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Combining eDNA and visual surveys improves the detection of reef fishes near the limits of their known distributions. This approach helps reveal overlooked species, particularly those that are cryptic, rare or low in abundance, and supports more accurate assessments of species distributions across biogeographic gradients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.70089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.70089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Rapid shifts in marine species distributions driven by ocean warming require more effective monitoring across entire ranges to detect emerging ecological change. Traditionally, visual surveys have been used to track these distributional shifts, but they often overlook small-bodied, rare or cryptic species, potentially underestimating range changes. Environmental DNA (eDNA) bypasses these limitations, yet its effectiveness in detecting species near their range limits remains understudied.

Location

Eastern Australia.

Methods

We combined eDNA metabarcoding and visual surveys to assess reef fish communities across nine sites spanning a 2000-km latitudinal gradient within a global warming hotspot encapsulating tropical, subtropical and temperate reefs. Variation in detectability across methods and biogeographic ranges was also assessed at the level of functional traits (trophic guild, thermal guild and water column position).

Results

eDNA and visual surveys revealed different fish species compositions, potentially underestimating the extent of fish biogeographic ranges. eDNA detected 44 more unique tropical species than visual surveys across their range, and was more effective at detecting tropical carnivores, omnivores, invertivores, planktivores, detritivores and all water column positions. In contrast, visual surveys were more effective at detecting temperate carnivores, invertivores and benthic species. For tropical fishes at their cold range edge in temperate ecosystems, eDNA identified 12 unique species, including herbivores and cryptic species not previously recorded by long-term visual surveys. Contrastingly, eDNA detected 20 fewer temperate species than visual surveys across their biogeographic range and was less effective (five unique species) than visual surveys (nine unique species) at detecting temperate species at their warm trailing range in subtropical ecosystems.

Conclusions

Combining eDNA and visual surveys improves the detection of reef fishes near the limits of their known distributions. This approach helps reveal overlooked species, particularly those that are cryptic, rare or low in abundance, and supports more accurate assessments of species distributions across biogeographic gradients.

Abstract Image

结合eDNA和视觉调查提高了对珊瑚礁鱼类生物地理范围的检测
目的海洋变暖导致海洋物种分布的快速变化,需要对整个范围进行更有效的监测,以发现正在出现的生态变化。传统上,视觉调查被用来追踪这些分布变化,但他们经常忽略小体,稀有或隐蔽的物种,潜在地低估了范围变化。环境DNA (eDNA)绕过了这些限制,但其在检测接近其范围限制的物种方面的有效性仍未得到充分研究。地点:澳大利亚东部。方法结合eDNA元条形码和视觉调查,对全球变暖热点地区包括热带、亚热带和温带珊瑚礁在内的9个地点的珊瑚鱼群落进行了评估,这些地点跨越2000公里的纬度梯度。在功能性状(营养行会、热行会和水柱位置)水平上,还评估了不同方法和生物地理范围的可探测性差异。结果eDNA和目视调查显示了不同的鱼类种类组成,可能低估了鱼类的生物地理范围。与目测相比,eDNA检测到44种独特的热带物种,并且在检测热带食肉动物、杂食动物、无脊椎动物、浮游动物、腐食动物和所有水柱位置时更有效。相比之下,视觉调查在发现温带食肉动物、无脊椎动物和底栖动物物种时更有效。对于温带生态系统中处于寒冷边缘的热带鱼,eDNA鉴定出了12种独特的物种,包括食草动物和以前没有通过长期视觉调查记录的隐物种。相比之下,eDNA在其生物地理范围内发现的温带物种比目测少20种,在亚热带生态系统温暖尾随范围内发现温带物种的效果(5种独特物种)低于目测(9种独特物种)。结论结合eDNA和目视调查可以提高对已知分布极限附近的礁鱼的检测。这种方法有助于揭示被忽视的物种,特别是那些隐蔽的、稀有的或丰度低的物种,并支持更准确地评估物种在生物地理梯度中的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信