{"title":"A Micro-Scale Framework for Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Building-Level Floodproofing Measures","authors":"Abbas FathiAzar, Silvia De Angeli","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of building-level floodproofing into flood risk management frameworks is gaining increasing recognition. As property owners ultimately decide on implementation, and financial incentives can drive adoption, a critical gap remains: the absence of Building-Specific, Context-Sensitive, Micro-Scale Risk Assessment (BC_MRA) frameworks that effectively support property owners and policymakers in their decision-making. This study introduces a BC_MRA framework alongside a straightforward yet expandable risk-based incentive structure, representing an innovative approach to enhancing property-level floodproofing, hereby advancing flood resilience research. A key contribution is a systematic methodology that contextualizes all the components of micro-scale flood risk assessment and the process for assessing the effectiveness of floodproofing interventions. The framework is applied to a case study in Pesaro, Italy, where dry and wet floodproofing strategies' financial viability and risk reduction potential are evaluated in response to riverine flood risk. Results underscore the importance of BC_MRA to inform effective micro-scale flood mitigation, revealing that expected annual damage is not solely dependent on proximity to the river but is also significantly influenced by building-specific vulnerability to flooding. Furthermore, wet floodproofing consistently resulted in longer payback periods compared with dry floodproofing, rendering it economically unviable for any of the buildings studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The integration of building-level floodproofing into flood risk management frameworks is gaining increasing recognition. As property owners ultimately decide on implementation, and financial incentives can drive adoption, a critical gap remains: the absence of Building-Specific, Context-Sensitive, Micro-Scale Risk Assessment (BC_MRA) frameworks that effectively support property owners and policymakers in their decision-making. This study introduces a BC_MRA framework alongside a straightforward yet expandable risk-based incentive structure, representing an innovative approach to enhancing property-level floodproofing, hereby advancing flood resilience research. A key contribution is a systematic methodology that contextualizes all the components of micro-scale flood risk assessment and the process for assessing the effectiveness of floodproofing interventions. The framework is applied to a case study in Pesaro, Italy, where dry and wet floodproofing strategies' financial viability and risk reduction potential are evaluated in response to riverine flood risk. Results underscore the importance of BC_MRA to inform effective micro-scale flood mitigation, revealing that expected annual damage is not solely dependent on proximity to the river but is also significantly influenced by building-specific vulnerability to flooding. Furthermore, wet floodproofing consistently resulted in longer payback periods compared with dry floodproofing, rendering it economically unviable for any of the buildings studied.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.