The Effect of Seductive Details on Knowledge Retention in Physics Videos: A Mixed Methods Study

IF 4.5 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Richard Brock, Liam Cini O'Dwyer, Ben Rogers
{"title":"The Effect of Seductive Details on Knowledge Retention in Physics Videos: A Mixed Methods Study","authors":"Richard Brock,&nbsp;Liam Cini O'Dwyer,&nbsp;Ben Rogers","doi":"10.1002/tea.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research reports that interesting but irrelevant information, seductive details, in teaching material can impede learning. In science education, the inclusion of historical narratives in lessons to promote interest has been recommended but may hinder learning. This study examines the impact of seductive details on UK high school students' knowledge retention from video explanations. The research adopted a mixed methods approach. In the first study, an online survey (<i>N</i> = 101) randomized participants to watch video explanations of two physics topics (dark matter and tracers), with seductive details or without, and compared pre-, post-, and delayed knowledge test scores. Six participants were interviewed. In the second study, nine participants took part in a think-aloud protocol while watching videos to examine perceptions of the videos. In the first study, the seductive details in one topic (dark matter) harmed learning (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.01, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.114), but not in the second (tracer, <i>p</i> = 0.166). Data from the think-aloud task indicate an explanation for the mixed effect. Seductive details may both impede learning but also promote attention to core content, chunk material, and provide structure into which new content can be anchored when prior knowledge is low. Seductive details should be used with caution. They have the potential to impede learning, but, in some contexts, their negative impact on learning may be limited. Their effects depend on the context. The inclusion of seductive details in video explanations should not be ruled out, and we present guidance for reducing the impediment that interesting but inessential details can cause.</p>","PeriodicalId":48369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","volume":"62 8","pages":"1923-1940"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.70005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research reports that interesting but irrelevant information, seductive details, in teaching material can impede learning. In science education, the inclusion of historical narratives in lessons to promote interest has been recommended but may hinder learning. This study examines the impact of seductive details on UK high school students' knowledge retention from video explanations. The research adopted a mixed methods approach. In the first study, an online survey (N = 101) randomized participants to watch video explanations of two physics topics (dark matter and tracers), with seductive details or without, and compared pre-, post-, and delayed knowledge test scores. Six participants were interviewed. In the second study, nine participants took part in a think-aloud protocol while watching videos to examine perceptions of the videos. In the first study, the seductive details in one topic (dark matter) harmed learning (p > 0.01, η2 = 0.114), but not in the second (tracer, p = 0.166). Data from the think-aloud task indicate an explanation for the mixed effect. Seductive details may both impede learning but also promote attention to core content, chunk material, and provide structure into which new content can be anchored when prior knowledge is low. Seductive details should be used with caution. They have the potential to impede learning, but, in some contexts, their negative impact on learning may be limited. Their effects depend on the context. The inclusion of seductive details in video explanations should not be ruled out, and we present guidance for reducing the impediment that interesting but inessential details can cause.

Abstract Image

物理视频中诱惑性细节对知识保留的影响:一项混合方法研究
研究报告称,教材中有趣但不相关的信息、诱人的细节会阻碍学习。在科学教育中,建议在课程中加入历史叙述以提高兴趣,但可能会阻碍学习。本研究考察了诱惑性细节对英国高中生从视频讲解中记忆知识的影响。这项研究采用了混合方法。在第一项研究中,一项在线调查(N = 101)随机分配了参与者观看两个物理主题(暗物质和示踪剂)的视频解释,其中有或没有诱人的细节,并比较了知识测试前、后和延迟的分数。六名参与者接受了采访。在第二项研究中,九名参与者在观看视频的同时参加了一项有声思考方案,以检验他们对视频的看法。在第一项研究中,一个主题(暗物质)的诱人细节损害了学习(p > 0.01, η2 = 0.114),但在第二项研究中没有(示踪剂,p = 0.166)。“有声思考”任务的数据为这种混合效应提供了一个解释。诱人的细节可能会阻碍学习,但也会促进对核心内容、块材料的关注,并提供结构,当先验知识不足时,可以锚定新内容。要谨慎使用诱人的细节。它们有可能阻碍学习,但在某些情况下,它们对学习的负面影响可能是有限的。它们的效果取决于环境。不应排除在视频解释中包含诱人的细节,我们提供指导,以减少有趣但不必要的细节可能造成的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Journal of Research in Science Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
19.60%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, the official journal of NARST: A Worldwide Organization for Improving Science Teaching and Learning Through Research, publishes reports for science education researchers and practitioners on issues of science teaching and learning and science education policy. Scholarly manuscripts within the domain of the Journal of Research in Science Teaching include, but are not limited to, investigations employing qualitative, ethnographic, historical, survey, philosophical, case study research, quantitative, experimental, quasi-experimental, data mining, and data analytics approaches; position papers; policy perspectives; critical reviews of the literature; and comments and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信