{"title":"Deep Dive Into Sustainable Development Goals Through the Lens of Triple Bottom Line: Past, Present, and Future","authors":"Alka Kumari, Mousumi Ghosh, Manvendra Pratap Singh","doi":"10.1002/cjas.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Recent wars, pandemics, global warming, healthcare crises, and economic strain have profoundly affected the socio-economic-environmental conditions of many developed & developing countries, impacting the triple bottom line. In response, governments are striving to address these challenges through the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, the United Nations (UN) SDGs mid-term review report has recently attracted attention in response to the urgent call for action against countries' poor performance. Despite ongoing research on SDGs, the existing body of work is scattered. There is a crucial deficit in comprehension regarding the evolution of this research domain, as well as the prevailing research's fundamental focus and implicit assumptions. This study employs bibliometric and content analysis to comprehensively examine the contemporary status of research. The study examines influential works, intellectual structures, and research gaps using citation networks, bibliographic coupling, and thematic mapping. Analyzing 779 documents from January 2001 to February 2024, this study found that research interest surged significantly after 2014 and again in 2023. The United States and China are the leading contributors, whereas African and North Asian countries require greater focus. Furthermore, South Asian institutions and authors are at the forefront of contributions to sustainable development research. Developing countries increasingly emphasize rapid growth coupled with sustainable practices to strengthen the three pillars of the triple bottom line. Keyword analysis indicates that the primary focus areas are life cycle assessment, reverse logistics, social sustainability, circular economy, Industry 4.0, and sustainable business models. Further, within the content analysis, the comparative study of the top 50 cited documents and UN mid-term SDGs review report advocates for future research on sustainability practices such as lean manufacturing, reverse logistics, life cycle assessment, supply chain management, integration of advanced technologies, and reporting quality to enhance business responsiveness toward society. The results of this study may aid scholarly research, managers, and policymakers in adopting sustainable methodologies, promoting a more enduring future.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47349,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","volume":"42 3","pages":"352-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjas.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent wars, pandemics, global warming, healthcare crises, and economic strain have profoundly affected the socio-economic-environmental conditions of many developed & developing countries, impacting the triple bottom line. In response, governments are striving to address these challenges through the 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, the United Nations (UN) SDGs mid-term review report has recently attracted attention in response to the urgent call for action against countries' poor performance. Despite ongoing research on SDGs, the existing body of work is scattered. There is a crucial deficit in comprehension regarding the evolution of this research domain, as well as the prevailing research's fundamental focus and implicit assumptions. This study employs bibliometric and content analysis to comprehensively examine the contemporary status of research. The study examines influential works, intellectual structures, and research gaps using citation networks, bibliographic coupling, and thematic mapping. Analyzing 779 documents from January 2001 to February 2024, this study found that research interest surged significantly after 2014 and again in 2023. The United States and China are the leading contributors, whereas African and North Asian countries require greater focus. Furthermore, South Asian institutions and authors are at the forefront of contributions to sustainable development research. Developing countries increasingly emphasize rapid growth coupled with sustainable practices to strengthen the three pillars of the triple bottom line. Keyword analysis indicates that the primary focus areas are life cycle assessment, reverse logistics, social sustainability, circular economy, Industry 4.0, and sustainable business models. Further, within the content analysis, the comparative study of the top 50 cited documents and UN mid-term SDGs review report advocates for future research on sustainability practices such as lean manufacturing, reverse logistics, life cycle assessment, supply chain management, integration of advanced technologies, and reporting quality to enhance business responsiveness toward society. The results of this study may aid scholarly research, managers, and policymakers in adopting sustainable methodologies, promoting a more enduring future.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences (CJAS) is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, international quarterly that publishes manuscripts with a strong theoretical foundation. The journal welcomes literature reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies as well as conceptual pieces. CJAS is an ISI-listed journal that publishes papers in all key disciplines of business. CJAS is a particularly suitable home for manuscripts of a crossdisciplinary nature. All papers must state in an explicit and compelling way their unique contribution to advancing theory and/or practice in the administrative sciences.