Proposal for a low-cost methodology for selecting areas to locate a sanitary landfill using GIS and multi-criteria analysis: case study in São Paulo, Brazil

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Jandir Pereira Blasius, Marly Aparecida da Silva, Ronan Cleber Contrera, Pedro Daniel da Cunha Kemerich, Lucas Tadeu Fuess, Marcelo Loureiro Garcia
{"title":"Proposal for a low-cost methodology for selecting areas to locate a sanitary landfill using GIS and multi-criteria analysis: case study in São Paulo, Brazil","authors":"Jandir Pereira Blasius,&nbsp;Marly Aparecida da Silva,&nbsp;Ronan Cleber Contrera,&nbsp;Pedro Daniel da Cunha Kemerich,&nbsp;Lucas Tadeu Fuess,&nbsp;Marcelo Loureiro Garcia","doi":"10.1007/s12517-025-12318-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The municipalities in the region of Araras/São Paulo present difficulties in the adequate disposal of waste, as they do not have resources to implement individual solutions, and the existing landfills in the region have a relatively short useful life. In line with the guidelines of the National Policy on Solid Waste (PNRS), which encourages consortium solutions to optimize infrastructure and to reduce costs, an intermunicipal consortium involving Araras and adjacent municipalities was proposed and the need for a minimum area of 40 hectares for installing a new intermunicipal sanitary landfill (ISL) was estimated. This study thus presents a low-cost methodology that integrates free geographic information systems (GIS) tools with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques to identify areas suitable for implementing the ISL. The approach was structured into three main stages: (i) application of restrictive criteria to exclude unsuitable areas; (ii) weighting of areas previously classified as suitable by elaborating four scenarios (environmental, economic, social, and balanced); and (iii) refinement of the pre-selected areas based on additional spatial and contextual criteria. Of the 33.5% of the territory considered suitable, the balanced scenario (scenario 4) highlighted 21.17% of the area as “Excellent,” allowing the pre-selection of ten locations, of which three were prioritized after refinement, culminating in the selection of Area 5 as the most favorable. The methodology proved to be effective, efficient, and innovative, by offering an accessible, adaptable, and technically robust structure for locating projects with high potential for environmental impact. Its differential lies in the flexibility provided by the creation of multiple scenarios, allowing managers to evaluate alternatives based on different priorities and to opt for more sustainable approaches. The ease of application of the techniques involved, combined with the possibility of prioritizing the criteria and replicability in other regions, reinforces the potential of this approach as a strategic tool in territorial planning and integrated waste management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":"18 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-025-12318-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The municipalities in the region of Araras/São Paulo present difficulties in the adequate disposal of waste, as they do not have resources to implement individual solutions, and the existing landfills in the region have a relatively short useful life. In line with the guidelines of the National Policy on Solid Waste (PNRS), which encourages consortium solutions to optimize infrastructure and to reduce costs, an intermunicipal consortium involving Araras and adjacent municipalities was proposed and the need for a minimum area of 40 hectares for installing a new intermunicipal sanitary landfill (ISL) was estimated. This study thus presents a low-cost methodology that integrates free geographic information systems (GIS) tools with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques to identify areas suitable for implementing the ISL. The approach was structured into three main stages: (i) application of restrictive criteria to exclude unsuitable areas; (ii) weighting of areas previously classified as suitable by elaborating four scenarios (environmental, economic, social, and balanced); and (iii) refinement of the pre-selected areas based on additional spatial and contextual criteria. Of the 33.5% of the territory considered suitable, the balanced scenario (scenario 4) highlighted 21.17% of the area as “Excellent,” allowing the pre-selection of ten locations, of which three were prioritized after refinement, culminating in the selection of Area 5 as the most favorable. The methodology proved to be effective, efficient, and innovative, by offering an accessible, adaptable, and technically robust structure for locating projects with high potential for environmental impact. Its differential lies in the flexibility provided by the creation of multiple scenarios, allowing managers to evaluate alternatives based on different priorities and to opt for more sustainable approaches. The ease of application of the techniques involved, combined with the possibility of prioritizing the criteria and replicability in other regions, reinforces the potential of this approach as a strategic tool in territorial planning and integrated waste management.

使用地理信息系统和多标准分析选择卫生填埋场选址区域的低成本方法建议:巴西圣保罗的案例研究
阿拉拉斯/ 圣保罗地区的市政当局在充分处理废物方面存在困难,因为他们没有资源来实施单独的解决方案,而且该地区现有的垃圾填埋场的使用寿命相对较短。根据国家固体废物政策(PNRS)的指导方针,该政策鼓励联合体解决优化基础设施和降低成本的问题,提出了一个由阿拉拉斯州和邻近城市组成的城市间联合体,并估计需要至少40公顷的面积来安装一个新的城市间卫生填埋场(ISL)。因此,本研究提出了一种低成本的方法,该方法将免费的地理信息系统(GIS)工具与多标准决策分析(MCDA)技术相结合,以确定适合实施ISL的地区。该办法分为三个主要阶段:(i)采用限制性标准排除不适当的地区;(ii)通过阐述四种情景(环境、经济、社会和平衡),对先前划分为适宜的地区进行加权;(iii)根据额外的空间和环境标准对预先选定的区域进行细化。在33.5%被认为合适的地区中,平衡方案(方案4)突出21.17%的地区为“优秀”,允许预先选择10个地点,其中3个地点经过优化后优先考虑,最终选择第5区为最有利的地点。该方法被证明是有效的、高效的和创新的,通过提供一个可访问的、适应性强的和技术上可靠的结构来定位具有高环境影响潜力的项目。它的不同之处在于创造多种情景所提供的灵活性,使管理人员能够根据不同的优先次序评价备选方案,并选择更可持续的办法。所涉及的技术很容易应用,再加上这些标准有可能成为优先事项,并可在其他区域复制,因此加强了这种办法作为领土规划和综合废物管理的战略工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信