{"title":"Greener for greater security? The role of green finance in energy security amid rising geopolitical risks","authors":"Duc Hong Vo , Chi Minh Ho , Ngoc Duc Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy security is an undeniably crucial factor in economies' stable functioning and societies' well-being. However, global energy security has been continuously threatened by adverse geopolitical events. This study is conducted to examine if green finance can be an effective tool to improve energy security and, if so, whether green finance can act as a shield against geopolitical risk using a sample of 37 countries from 2013 to 2018. Our analysis is also extended to use another proxy of energy security for 36 countries in an extended and updated period from 2013 to 2022. Our results show that green finance can significantly reduce energy security risks worldwide. Furthermore, our heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of green finance on energy security risks is also more substantial in the OECD (IEA) countries than in non-OECD (non-IEA) countries. Results from the panel quantile regression also show that the impact of green finance is heterogeneous and significant across different quantiles of energy security. This finding suggests a V-shaped pattern from the effect of green finance, indicating that countries with either very high or very low levels of energy security risk benefit the most from green finance. Interestingly, when green finance is considered a moderator in the effect of geopolitical risk on energy security, we find that green finance acts as a shield against the adverse impacts of increasing geopolitical risk. Our results are robust against endogeneity and largely unchanged across different estimations. Important policy implications have emerged from our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108902"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy security is an undeniably crucial factor in economies' stable functioning and societies' well-being. However, global energy security has been continuously threatened by adverse geopolitical events. This study is conducted to examine if green finance can be an effective tool to improve energy security and, if so, whether green finance can act as a shield against geopolitical risk using a sample of 37 countries from 2013 to 2018. Our analysis is also extended to use another proxy of energy security for 36 countries in an extended and updated period from 2013 to 2022. Our results show that green finance can significantly reduce energy security risks worldwide. Furthermore, our heterogeneity analysis shows that the impact of green finance on energy security risks is also more substantial in the OECD (IEA) countries than in non-OECD (non-IEA) countries. Results from the panel quantile regression also show that the impact of green finance is heterogeneous and significant across different quantiles of energy security. This finding suggests a V-shaped pattern from the effect of green finance, indicating that countries with either very high or very low levels of energy security risk benefit the most from green finance. Interestingly, when green finance is considered a moderator in the effect of geopolitical risk on energy security, we find that green finance acts as a shield against the adverse impacts of increasing geopolitical risk. Our results are robust against endogeneity and largely unchanged across different estimations. Important policy implications have emerged from our findings.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.