Ana Fresán , Ricardo-Arturo Saracco-Alvarez , J. Mónica Arienti-González , Rebeca Robles-García , Carlos-Alfonso Tovila-Zárate , J. Nicolás I. Martínez-López
{"title":"Validity and reliability of Mexican version of MacArthur competence assessment tool for treatment decision (MacCAT-T) in patients with schizophrenia","authors":"Ana Fresán , Ricardo-Arturo Saracco-Alvarez , J. Mónica Arienti-González , Rebeca Robles-García , Carlos-Alfonso Tovila-Zárate , J. Nicolás I. Martínez-López","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), a semi-structured interview, is designed to evaluate patient decision-making capacity, a crucial aspect of patient-physician interaction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A process study was undertaken of a sample of Mexicans diagnosed with schizophrenia aged between 18 and 50 years to determine the validity and reliability of the MacCAT-T in this population. A ROC curve was plotted to obtain discriminant validity, convergent validity was tested with the VAGUS scale and internal consistency was obtained as a measure of reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Adequate sensitivity (0.95) and specificity (0.75) were obtained with a cut-off point of seven. Significant correlations were observed between the MacCAT-T and the VAGUS scales (<em>r</em> = 0.54 and <em>r</em> = 0.76, <em>p</em> < 0.05), indicative of adequate convergent validity. Internal consistency values were 0.93 for the total score and over 0.80 for all its dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrated that the MacCAT-T is a valid, reliable tool that can be used to assess decision-making capacity in Mexican patients with schizophrenia, which could have a heuristic value for promoting ethical clinical and research practices designed to achieve the crucial balance between patient autonomy and safeguarding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016025272500086X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), a semi-structured interview, is designed to evaluate patient decision-making capacity, a crucial aspect of patient-physician interaction.
Methods
A process study was undertaken of a sample of Mexicans diagnosed with schizophrenia aged between 18 and 50 years to determine the validity and reliability of the MacCAT-T in this population. A ROC curve was plotted to obtain discriminant validity, convergent validity was tested with the VAGUS scale and internal consistency was obtained as a measure of reliability.
Results
Adequate sensitivity (0.95) and specificity (0.75) were obtained with a cut-off point of seven. Significant correlations were observed between the MacCAT-T and the VAGUS scales (r = 0.54 and r = 0.76, p < 0.05), indicative of adequate convergent validity. Internal consistency values were 0.93 for the total score and over 0.80 for all its dimensions.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that the MacCAT-T is a valid, reliable tool that can be used to assess decision-making capacity in Mexican patients with schizophrenia, which could have a heuristic value for promoting ethical clinical and research practices designed to achieve the crucial balance between patient autonomy and safeguarding.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.