Misconceptions leading to human papillomavirus vaccination hesitancy in Nigeria: Findings from a modified Delphi panel with stakeholders of the immunization ecosystem

IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Mohammed Mohammed Manga , Adeola Fowotade , Zara Isah Modibbo , Mashudu Madhivhandila , Tidiane Ndao , Olufemi Abayomi , Yahaya Mohammed
{"title":"Misconceptions leading to human papillomavirus vaccination hesitancy in Nigeria: Findings from a modified Delphi panel with stakeholders of the immunization ecosystem","authors":"Mohammed Mohammed Manga ,&nbsp;Adeola Fowotade ,&nbsp;Zara Isah Modibbo ,&nbsp;Mashudu Madhivhandila ,&nbsp;Tidiane Ndao ,&nbsp;Olufemi Abayomi ,&nbsp;Yahaya Mohammed","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Human papilloma virus (HPV) is a significant contributor to various cancers, notably cervical cancer, which poses a major health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including Nigeria. Despite the availability and effectiveness of HPV vaccines, many SSA countries have yet to reach the World Health Organization's vaccination goals. Nigeria introduced the HPV vaccine for girls (9–14 years) as part of the national immunization program in October 2023. This was heralded with certain misconceptions among both healthcare workers and the general populace. This study aimed to identify and rank these misconceptions via the modified Delphi technique to increase HPV vaccination coverage in Nigeria.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The primary objective of this study was to identify and rank predominant HPV vaccine misconceptions in Nigeria, summarize the stability of expert judgments across rounds and to translate the prioritized list into communication and training recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted desk review, expert validation and a two-round modified Delphi with immunization stakeholders from across Nigeria's 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. Thirteen candidate misconceptions were generated from desk review and validation meetings, then rated on a five-point Likert “criticality” scale reflecting perceived prevalence, barrier importance, and likely impact on uptake if unaddressed. Descriptive statistics summarized item rankings and round-to-round changes; a paired <em>t</em>-test assessed aggregate stability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-nine panelists completed both rounds. Rank order at the top was stable: the infertility/population-control misconception consistently ranked first, followed by the belief that vaccination promotes adolescent promiscuity, safety/“Western conspiracy” and “unknown long-term side-effects” clustered next. Aggregate ratings did not change significantly between rounds (paired <em>t</em>-test t (8) = 0.39, <em>p</em> = 0.71).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The stability of ratings between rounds indicate that observed differences were compatible with random variation rather than systematic shifts in opinion. A decision-ready prioritization of HPV vaccine misconceptions highlights a set of high-level misconceptions, like infertility, promiscuity, and safety/conspiracy narratives that should anchor first-wave communication in Nigeria.</div><div>Programs can translate these findings into audience-specific strategies like caregiver and community‑leader engagement with clear, safety-affirming messages, brief provider scripts and micro-training for school and clinic encounters and concise briefs for local decision-makers. Future iterations should pre-specify formal consensus thresholds and incorporate public prevalence measures to refine priority setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225001238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Human papilloma virus (HPV) is a significant contributor to various cancers, notably cervical cancer, which poses a major health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including Nigeria. Despite the availability and effectiveness of HPV vaccines, many SSA countries have yet to reach the World Health Organization's vaccination goals. Nigeria introduced the HPV vaccine for girls (9–14 years) as part of the national immunization program in October 2023. This was heralded with certain misconceptions among both healthcare workers and the general populace. This study aimed to identify and rank these misconceptions via the modified Delphi technique to increase HPV vaccination coverage in Nigeria.

Objectives

The primary objective of this study was to identify and rank predominant HPV vaccine misconceptions in Nigeria, summarize the stability of expert judgments across rounds and to translate the prioritized list into communication and training recommendations.

Methods

We conducted desk review, expert validation and a two-round modified Delphi with immunization stakeholders from across Nigeria's 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. Thirteen candidate misconceptions were generated from desk review and validation meetings, then rated on a five-point Likert “criticality” scale reflecting perceived prevalence, barrier importance, and likely impact on uptake if unaddressed. Descriptive statistics summarized item rankings and round-to-round changes; a paired t-test assessed aggregate stability.

Results

Forty-nine panelists completed both rounds. Rank order at the top was stable: the infertility/population-control misconception consistently ranked first, followed by the belief that vaccination promotes adolescent promiscuity, safety/“Western conspiracy” and “unknown long-term side-effects” clustered next. Aggregate ratings did not change significantly between rounds (paired t-test t (8) = 0.39, p = 0.71).

Conclusion

The stability of ratings between rounds indicate that observed differences were compatible with random variation rather than systematic shifts in opinion. A decision-ready prioritization of HPV vaccine misconceptions highlights a set of high-level misconceptions, like infertility, promiscuity, and safety/conspiracy narratives that should anchor first-wave communication in Nigeria.
Programs can translate these findings into audience-specific strategies like caregiver and community‑leader engagement with clear, safety-affirming messages, brief provider scripts and micro-training for school and clinic encounters and concise briefs for local decision-makers. Future iterations should pre-specify formal consensus thresholds and incorporate public prevalence measures to refine priority setting.
误解导致尼日利亚人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种犹豫不决:来自免疫生态系统利益攸关方改进的德尔菲小组的调查结果
人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是导致多种癌症的重要因素,尤其是宫颈癌,对包括尼日利亚在内的撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)构成了重大的健康挑战。尽管有HPV疫苗的可用性和有效性,但许多SSA国家尚未达到世界卫生组织的疫苗接种目标。尼日利亚于2023年10月将针对女童(9-14岁)的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗纳入国家免疫规划。这在卫生保健工作者和普通民众中引起了某些误解。本研究旨在通过改进的德尔菲技术对这些误解进行识别和排序,以提高尼日利亚的HPV疫苗接种覆盖率。本研究的主要目的是确定尼日利亚主要的HPV疫苗误解并对其进行排名,总结各轮专家判断的稳定性,并将优先列表转化为沟通和培训建议。方法我们对来自尼日利亚36个州和联邦首都直辖区的免疫利益攸关方进行了案头审查、专家验证和两轮改进德尔菲调查。从案头审查和验证会议中产生了13个候选误解,然后根据5分李克特“临界性”量表进行评分,该量表反映了感知的流行程度、障碍的重要性以及如果不加以解决可能对吸收的影响。描述性统计汇总了项目排名和轮间变化;配对t检验评估总体稳定性。结果49名小组成员完成了两轮调查。排名最靠前的是稳定的:不孕症/人口控制的误解一直排在第一位,其次是认为接种疫苗会促进青少年滥交的信念,其次是安全性/“西方阴谋”和“未知的长期副作用”。总评分在两轮之间没有显著变化(配对t检验t (8) = 0.39, p = 0.71)。结论轮次评分的稳定性表明,观察到的差异与随机变化相一致,而不是系统性的意见转变。对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗误解的决定优先次序突出了一系列高级误解,如不孕、滥交和安全/阴谋叙事,这些误解应该成为尼日利亚第一波传播的基础。项目可以将这些发现转化为针对特定受众的策略,如护理人员和社区领导人的参与,提供明确、肯定安全的信息,为学校和诊所提供简短的提供者脚本和微型培训,并为当地决策者提供简明的简报。未来的迭代应该预先指定正式的共识阈值,并纳入公共流行度量以改进优先级设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信