CRA clad pipes: Do their benefits justify sole selection?

IF 4.9 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Ahmed Reda , Mohammad Zam Zam Noor , Ali Karrech
{"title":"CRA clad pipes: Do their benefits justify sole selection?","authors":"Ahmed Reda ,&nbsp;Mohammad Zam Zam Noor ,&nbsp;Ali Karrech","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2024.100245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents a case study of a gas leak at a girth weld on a subsea spool. The leak occurred 14 days after the pipeline’s start-up. The pipeline in question was a 36-inch corrosion-resistant alloy (CRA) clad pipeline, with a carrier pipe made of X65 steel and a 3 mm layer of alloy 825. The girth weld was performed using alloy 625. The leak occurred at the girth weld between the riser and the tie-in subsea spool. The failure was attributed to excessive misalignment, which was unavoidable and evident in radiographic testing (RT). To pass the girth weld in terms of quality control, the welder ground the area around the root where the highest misalignment was located, inadvertently grinding through the CRA clad layer and exposing the carbon steel directly to sour gas. The pipeline had been installed and left in a preservation mode using treated inhibited seawater for several years. It was later dewatered, conditioned, and purged before introducing the wet sour gas. Fourteen days after the start-up, the pipeline ruptured, as discussed in this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143324000726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a case study of a gas leak at a girth weld on a subsea spool. The leak occurred 14 days after the pipeline’s start-up. The pipeline in question was a 36-inch corrosion-resistant alloy (CRA) clad pipeline, with a carrier pipe made of X65 steel and a 3 mm layer of alloy 825. The girth weld was performed using alloy 625. The leak occurred at the girth weld between the riser and the tie-in subsea spool. The failure was attributed to excessive misalignment, which was unavoidable and evident in radiographic testing (RT). To pass the girth weld in terms of quality control, the welder ground the area around the root where the highest misalignment was located, inadvertently grinding through the CRA clad layer and exposing the carbon steel directly to sour gas. The pipeline had been installed and left in a preservation mode using treated inhibited seawater for several years. It was later dewatered, conditioned, and purged before introducing the wet sour gas. Fourteen days after the start-up, the pipeline ruptured, as discussed in this article.

Abstract Image

CRA包覆管道:它们的优点是否证明了选择单一管道的合理性?
本文介绍了一个海底阀芯环焊缝气体泄漏的案例研究。泄漏发生在管道启动14天后。该管道是一条36英寸的耐腐蚀合金(CRA)包覆管道,其载体管由X65钢制成,并有一层3毫米的825合金层。围焊采用625合金。泄漏发生在隔水管和连接的海底阀芯之间的环焊缝处。失败的原因是过度的不对准,这在放射检查(RT)中是不可避免的和明显的。为了在质量控制方面通过环焊缝,焊工在焊缝根部附近最错位的地方进行研磨,无意中磨穿了CRA包覆层,使碳钢直接暴露在酸性气体中。这条管道已经安装好,并使用经过处理的抑制海水保存了好几年。然后在引入湿酸气之前对其进行脱水、调节和净化。启动14天后,管道破裂,如本文所述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信