Critical reading in design education: Effects of layout on experts’ and novices’ visual attention and reading performance

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 Social Sciences
Yongchun Mao , Chuang Chen , Yiyu Deng , Zihao Cao
{"title":"Critical reading in design education: Effects of layout on experts’ and novices’ visual attention and reading performance","authors":"Yongchun Mao ,&nbsp;Chuang Chen ,&nbsp;Yiyu Deng ,&nbsp;Zihao Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study constructs a three-layer theoretical framework for critical reading aiming to explore the visual attention and reading performance of design students in critical reading. Specifically, we compared the performance of expert (more than three years) and novice (less than four months) design students when reading different layout configurations of a product design plan. A total of 80 participants, 40 experts and 40 novices, were recruited from a Chinese university. Using a 2 (expertise: expert vs. novice) × 2 (layout: text-image proximity vs. text-image separation) experimental design, participants' recall, insight scores, visual attention distribution and visual attention transition were analyzed. Eye-tracking data revealed that experts allocated significantly more visual attention to images and exhibited more complex fixation transitions between images and texts, suggesting higher levels of critical engagement. In contrast, novices displayed a more linear reading pattern, particularly in layouts that separated images from texts. Correspondingly, experts outperformed novices in both recall and insight scores. Additionally, layout configurations had a more complex impact on visual attention and performance. In the second layout, fixation time on images showed a positive correlation with insight, and experts exhibited fixation transitions between images. The results provide valuable insights for design educators, emphasizing the need for tailored instructional strategies to foster critical thinking skills in students at different educational levels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102011"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187125002597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study constructs a three-layer theoretical framework for critical reading aiming to explore the visual attention and reading performance of design students in critical reading. Specifically, we compared the performance of expert (more than three years) and novice (less than four months) design students when reading different layout configurations of a product design plan. A total of 80 participants, 40 experts and 40 novices, were recruited from a Chinese university. Using a 2 (expertise: expert vs. novice) × 2 (layout: text-image proximity vs. text-image separation) experimental design, participants' recall, insight scores, visual attention distribution and visual attention transition were analyzed. Eye-tracking data revealed that experts allocated significantly more visual attention to images and exhibited more complex fixation transitions between images and texts, suggesting higher levels of critical engagement. In contrast, novices displayed a more linear reading pattern, particularly in layouts that separated images from texts. Correspondingly, experts outperformed novices in both recall and insight scores. Additionally, layout configurations had a more complex impact on visual attention and performance. In the second layout, fixation time on images showed a positive correlation with insight, and experts exhibited fixation transitions between images. The results provide valuable insights for design educators, emphasizing the need for tailored instructional strategies to foster critical thinking skills in students at different educational levels.
设计教育中的批判性阅读:版式对专家和新手视觉注意力和阅读表现的影响
本研究构建了一个三层的批判性阅读理论框架,旨在探讨设计专业学生在批判性阅读中的视觉注意力和阅读表现。具体来说,我们比较了专业设计学生(三年以上)和新手(不到四个月)在阅读产品设计方案的不同布局配置时的表现。共有80名参与者,40名专家和40名新手,从一所中国大学招募。采用2(专业知识:专家vs新手)× 2(布局:文本-图像接近vs文本-图像分离)实验设计,分析被试的回忆、洞察力得分、视觉注意分布和视觉注意转移。眼动追踪数据显示,专家们在图像上分配了更多的视觉注意力,在图像和文本之间表现出更复杂的注视转换,这表明他们的批判性参与水平更高。相比之下,新手表现出更线性的阅读模式,特别是在将图像与文本分开的布局中。相应地,专家在记忆力和洞察力得分上都优于新手。此外,布局配置对视觉注意力和表现的影响更为复杂。在第二种布局中,专家对图像的注视时间与洞察力呈正相关,并且在图像之间表现出注视转换。研究结果为设计教育工作者提供了有价值的见解,强调需要量身定制的教学策略来培养不同教育水平学生的批判性思维技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Thinking Skills and Creativity EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.20%
发文量
172
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信