Drone-based photogrammetry and virtual reality: technological alternatives for tunnel inspection

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Leandro Silva de Assis, Bernardo Lopes Poncetti, Lucas Bellini Machado, Marcos Massao Futai
{"title":"Drone-based photogrammetry and virtual reality: technological alternatives for tunnel inspection","authors":"Leandro Silva de Assis,&nbsp;Bernardo Lopes Poncetti,&nbsp;Lucas Bellini Machado,&nbsp;Marcos Massao Futai","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.107094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative analysis of tunnel inspection methodologies, emphasizing the effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR) inspection using drone-based 3D photogrammetric models in contrast to traditional visual inspection (TVI). The experiment was conducted in a 750-meter-long engineered concrete road tunnel in São Paulo, Brazil. The research involved fixing 139 synthetic pathology indicators inside the tunnel to standardize the assessments, and the photogrammetric model was compared to the Sacannig terrestrial laser – TLS 3D model, to evaluate the geometry quality. Results revealed that TVI achieved a precision of just 18% and an accuracy of 63%, highlighting significant subjectivity and inconsistency in manual inspections. In contrast, the VR method demonstrated an improved precision of 73% and an accuracy of 98%, with a reduction in the false discovery rate from 32% to 1%. The drone inspection was completed in approximately 35 min, significantly reducing inspection time compared to the two hours required for TVI. Furthermore, the photogrammetric approach proved better than Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) in terms of occlusion reduction and visual realism, although TLS maintained advantages in data processing speed and accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first replicable study that directly compares VR-based inspection with TVI using a standardized dataset of synthetic tunnel pathologies, providing a robust ground-truth benchmark for future research. These findings underscore the potential of drone-based photogrammetry combined with Virtual Reality to enhance the efficiency, reliability, and scalability of tunnel inspections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107094"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825007321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of tunnel inspection methodologies, emphasizing the effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR) inspection using drone-based 3D photogrammetric models in contrast to traditional visual inspection (TVI). The experiment was conducted in a 750-meter-long engineered concrete road tunnel in São Paulo, Brazil. The research involved fixing 139 synthetic pathology indicators inside the tunnel to standardize the assessments, and the photogrammetric model was compared to the Sacannig terrestrial laser – TLS 3D model, to evaluate the geometry quality. Results revealed that TVI achieved a precision of just 18% and an accuracy of 63%, highlighting significant subjectivity and inconsistency in manual inspections. In contrast, the VR method demonstrated an improved precision of 73% and an accuracy of 98%, with a reduction in the false discovery rate from 32% to 1%. The drone inspection was completed in approximately 35 min, significantly reducing inspection time compared to the two hours required for TVI. Furthermore, the photogrammetric approach proved better than Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) in terms of occlusion reduction and visual realism, although TLS maintained advantages in data processing speed and accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first replicable study that directly compares VR-based inspection with TVI using a standardized dataset of synthetic tunnel pathologies, providing a robust ground-truth benchmark for future research. These findings underscore the potential of drone-based photogrammetry combined with Virtual Reality to enhance the efficiency, reliability, and scalability of tunnel inspections.
基于无人机的摄影测量和虚拟现实:隧道检查的技术选择
本研究对隧道检查方法进行了比较分析,强调了使用基于无人机的3D摄影测量模型进行虚拟现实(VR)检查与传统视觉检查(TVI)相比的有效性。实验在巴西圣保罗的一条750米长的工程混凝土公路隧道中进行。研究通过在隧道内固定139个综合病理指标来规范评估,并将摄影测量模型与Sacannig地面激光- TLS 3D模型进行比较,以评估几何质量。结果显示,TVI的精度仅为18%,准确度为63%,突出了人工检查的显著主观性和不一致性。相比之下,VR方法的精度提高了73%,准确率提高了98%,错误发现率从32%降低到1%。无人机检查大约在35分钟内完成,与TVI所需的两小时检查时间相比,大大缩短了检查时间。此外,尽管TLS在数据处理速度和精度上保持优势,但摄影测量方法在遮挡减少和视觉真实感方面优于地面激光扫描(Terrestrial Laser Scanning, TLS)。据我们所知,这是第一个使用标准化的合成隧道病理数据集直接比较基于vr的检查和TVI的可复制研究,为未来的研究提供了一个强大的基础事实基准。这些发现强调了无人机摄影测量与虚拟现实相结合的潜力,可以提高隧道检查的效率、可靠性和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信