A ternary framework for classifying and analyzing D-LCA across sectors: A systematic review

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Minghui Liang, Yahong Dong
{"title":"A ternary framework for classifying and analyzing D-LCA across sectors: A systematic review","authors":"Minghui Liang,&nbsp;Yahong Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) typically relies on static data, which makes it difficult to capture the dynamic spatial and temporal variations inherent in real-world systems, leading to potential biases between assessment results and actual environmental impacts. Dynamic life cycle assessment (D-LCA) addresses this issue by integrating dynamic changes. However, the inconsistent definitions and various dynamic characteristics in different sectors have hindered its applications. This study proposes a novel ternary conceptual framework comprising independent, intermediate, and dependent variables, designed to systematically classify and elucidate dynamic characteristics and their influence mechanisms across various sectors. Through a descriptive statistics of 256 D-LCA publications, this study synthesizes applications of this framework across six key sectors: construction, manufacturing, energy, agriculture and forestry, transportation, and water and waste services. The results reveal an imbalanced focus across sectors, with 74 studies concentrated in the construction sector. Most studies focused on temporal rather than spatial dynamics, with electricity mix being the most common intermediate variable. Furthermore, in the absence of a widely accepted definition of D-LCA, the classification of research types remains ambiguous. The proposed ternary framework offers valuable insights into interpreting dynamic characteristics across sectors. This study also elucidates dynamic characteristics, offering critical direction for future investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116329"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) typically relies on static data, which makes it difficult to capture the dynamic spatial and temporal variations inherent in real-world systems, leading to potential biases between assessment results and actual environmental impacts. Dynamic life cycle assessment (D-LCA) addresses this issue by integrating dynamic changes. However, the inconsistent definitions and various dynamic characteristics in different sectors have hindered its applications. This study proposes a novel ternary conceptual framework comprising independent, intermediate, and dependent variables, designed to systematically classify and elucidate dynamic characteristics and their influence mechanisms across various sectors. Through a descriptive statistics of 256 D-LCA publications, this study synthesizes applications of this framework across six key sectors: construction, manufacturing, energy, agriculture and forestry, transportation, and water and waste services. The results reveal an imbalanced focus across sectors, with 74 studies concentrated in the construction sector. Most studies focused on temporal rather than spatial dynamics, with electricity mix being the most common intermediate variable. Furthermore, in the absence of a widely accepted definition of D-LCA, the classification of research types remains ambiguous. The proposed ternary framework offers valuable insights into interpreting dynamic characteristics across sectors. This study also elucidates dynamic characteristics, offering critical direction for future investigations.
分类和分析跨部门D-LCA的三元框架:系统回顾
传统的生命周期评估(LCA)通常依赖于静态数据,难以捕捉现实世界系统固有的动态时空变化,导致评估结果与实际环境影响之间存在潜在偏差。动态生命周期评估(D-LCA)通过集成动态变化来解决这个问题。然而,其定义的不一致和不同领域的动态特性阻碍了其应用。本研究提出了一个新的三元概念框架,包括独立、中间和因变量,旨在系统地分类和阐明各个部门的动态特征及其影响机制。通过对256份D-LCA出版物的描述性统计,本研究综合了该框架在六个关键部门的应用:建筑、制造业、能源、农业和林业、交通、水和废物处理服务。研究结果显示,不同行业的关注不平衡,74项研究集中在建筑行业。大多数研究关注的是时间而不是空间动态,电力组合是最常见的中间变量。此外,由于缺乏被广泛接受的D-LCA定义,研究类型的分类仍然模糊不清。提出的三元框架为解释跨部门的动态特征提供了有价值的见解。该研究还阐明了动态特性,为未来的研究提供了关键方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信