{"title":"A ternary framework for classifying and analyzing D-LCA across sectors: A systematic review","authors":"Minghui Liang, Yahong Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) typically relies on static data, which makes it difficult to capture the dynamic spatial and temporal variations inherent in real-world systems, leading to potential biases between assessment results and actual environmental impacts. Dynamic life cycle assessment (D-LCA) addresses this issue by integrating dynamic changes. However, the inconsistent definitions and various dynamic characteristics in different sectors have hindered its applications. This study proposes a novel ternary conceptual framework comprising independent, intermediate, and dependent variables, designed to systematically classify and elucidate dynamic characteristics and their influence mechanisms across various sectors. Through a descriptive statistics of 256 D-LCA publications, this study synthesizes applications of this framework across six key sectors: construction, manufacturing, energy, agriculture and forestry, transportation, and water and waste services. The results reveal an imbalanced focus across sectors, with 74 studies concentrated in the construction sector. Most studies focused on temporal rather than spatial dynamics, with electricity mix being the most common intermediate variable. Furthermore, in the absence of a widely accepted definition of D-LCA, the classification of research types remains ambiguous. The proposed ternary framework offers valuable insights into interpreting dynamic characteristics across sectors. This study also elucidates dynamic characteristics, offering critical direction for future investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116329"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) typically relies on static data, which makes it difficult to capture the dynamic spatial and temporal variations inherent in real-world systems, leading to potential biases between assessment results and actual environmental impacts. Dynamic life cycle assessment (D-LCA) addresses this issue by integrating dynamic changes. However, the inconsistent definitions and various dynamic characteristics in different sectors have hindered its applications. This study proposes a novel ternary conceptual framework comprising independent, intermediate, and dependent variables, designed to systematically classify and elucidate dynamic characteristics and their influence mechanisms across various sectors. Through a descriptive statistics of 256 D-LCA publications, this study synthesizes applications of this framework across six key sectors: construction, manufacturing, energy, agriculture and forestry, transportation, and water and waste services. The results reveal an imbalanced focus across sectors, with 74 studies concentrated in the construction sector. Most studies focused on temporal rather than spatial dynamics, with electricity mix being the most common intermediate variable. Furthermore, in the absence of a widely accepted definition of D-LCA, the classification of research types remains ambiguous. The proposed ternary framework offers valuable insights into interpreting dynamic characteristics across sectors. This study also elucidates dynamic characteristics, offering critical direction for future investigations.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.