Banza Jean Claude, Linda L. Sibali, Vhahangwele Masindi
{"title":"Application of shrinking core and soft computing models (ANFIS and ANN) for the leaching of copper (II) from artificially contaminated soil","authors":"Banza Jean Claude, Linda L. Sibali, Vhahangwele Masindi","doi":"10.1016/j.clce.2025.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This leaching experiment optimises copper (II) leaching using sulfuric acid by integrating the shrinking core kinetic model with machine learning techniques, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS), and artificial neural networks (ANN), providing a hybrid computational framework that significantly enhances predictive accuracy and leaching efficiency compared to conventional empirical approaches. The factors in the leaching process, such as acid concentration, leaching time, temperature, soil-to-solution ratio, and stirring speed, were investigated for the removal of copper (II). Experimental and computational analyses revealed that leaching efficiency is governed by diffusion through insoluble sulfate/oxide layers, with agitation speed (reducing boundary layers) and acid concentration (enhancing H⁺ access) as key drivers. Under optimal conditions (pH 5.96, 0.88 M H₂SO₄, 274 rpm, 12.5 g/200 mL solid-liquid ratio), ANFIS predicted 99.8 % Cu(II) recovery, validated experimentally. Kinetic analysis confirmed product-layer diffusion control (R² > 0.99), supported by a low activation energy (17.96 kJ/mol) and rate suppression at high pH/solid ratios. The ANN (10 hidden layers, 4 inputs) outperformed ANFIS, achieving superior predictive accuracy (R² = 0.995 vs. 0.986) and lower error (RMSE: 0.061 vs. 0.129). Among the performance metrics, R² is the most critical, indicating that both models explain >98.6 % of variance in leaching behaviour well above the acceptable threshold (R² > 0.9) for reliable industrial prediction. The exceptionally low RMSE values (<0.13) further confirm minimal deviation between experimental and predicted results. This hybrid framework bridges mechanistic insight with AI-driven optimisation, offering a 15–20 % efficiency gain over conventional methods while diagnosing rate-limiting steps for scalable applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100251,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772782325000634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This leaching experiment optimises copper (II) leaching using sulfuric acid by integrating the shrinking core kinetic model with machine learning techniques, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS), and artificial neural networks (ANN), providing a hybrid computational framework that significantly enhances predictive accuracy and leaching efficiency compared to conventional empirical approaches. The factors in the leaching process, such as acid concentration, leaching time, temperature, soil-to-solution ratio, and stirring speed, were investigated for the removal of copper (II). Experimental and computational analyses revealed that leaching efficiency is governed by diffusion through insoluble sulfate/oxide layers, with agitation speed (reducing boundary layers) and acid concentration (enhancing H⁺ access) as key drivers. Under optimal conditions (pH 5.96, 0.88 M H₂SO₄, 274 rpm, 12.5 g/200 mL solid-liquid ratio), ANFIS predicted 99.8 % Cu(II) recovery, validated experimentally. Kinetic analysis confirmed product-layer diffusion control (R² > 0.99), supported by a low activation energy (17.96 kJ/mol) and rate suppression at high pH/solid ratios. The ANN (10 hidden layers, 4 inputs) outperformed ANFIS, achieving superior predictive accuracy (R² = 0.995 vs. 0.986) and lower error (RMSE: 0.061 vs. 0.129). Among the performance metrics, R² is the most critical, indicating that both models explain >98.6 % of variance in leaching behaviour well above the acceptable threshold (R² > 0.9) for reliable industrial prediction. The exceptionally low RMSE values (<0.13) further confirm minimal deviation between experimental and predicted results. This hybrid framework bridges mechanistic insight with AI-driven optimisation, offering a 15–20 % efficiency gain over conventional methods while diagnosing rate-limiting steps for scalable applications.