Factors of bias in spheroid-based drug screening: Fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sunghan Lee , Jiseok Lim , Bongseop Kwak
{"title":"Factors of bias in spheroid-based drug screening: Fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability","authors":"Sunghan Lee ,&nbsp;Jiseok Lim ,&nbsp;Bongseop Kwak","doi":"10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spheroids have emerged as powerful tools in drug screening by providing a physiologically relevant environment that more closely mimics <em>in vivo</em> conditions compared to 2D cultures. Despite these advantages, experimental outcomes using spheroids are often influenced by considerable variability and bias. This review explores three key factors that affect the evaluation of drug efficacy in spheroids, including fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability. First, it compares five commonly used spheroid fabrication platforms, outlining their principles, advantages, and limitations. Second, it examines biological contributors to spheroid size variation, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, protein expression, and cellular differentiation, and how they affect drug response. Third, it discusses how features such as hypoxic core development and anoikis sensitivity affect cell viability and potentially distort toxicity assessments. This review presents a conceptual framework for minimizing bias and improving reproducibility in spheroid-based drug screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8966,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 118597"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332225007917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spheroids have emerged as powerful tools in drug screening by providing a physiologically relevant environment that more closely mimics in vivo conditions compared to 2D cultures. Despite these advantages, experimental outcomes using spheroids are often influenced by considerable variability and bias. This review explores three key factors that affect the evaluation of drug efficacy in spheroids, including fabrication method, spheroid size, and cell viability. First, it compares five commonly used spheroid fabrication platforms, outlining their principles, advantages, and limitations. Second, it examines biological contributors to spheroid size variation, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, protein expression, and cellular differentiation, and how they affect drug response. Third, it discusses how features such as hypoxic core development and anoikis sensitivity affect cell viability and potentially distort toxicity assessments. This review presents a conceptual framework for minimizing bias and improving reproducibility in spheroid-based drug screening.
基于球体的药物筛选的偏倚因素:制造方法,球体大小和细胞活力
球体已经成为药物筛选的有力工具,它提供了一个与生理相关的环境,与二维培养相比,它更接近于模拟体内条件。尽管有这些优点,使用球体的实验结果经常受到相当大的可变性和偏差的影响。本文综述了影响球体药物疗效评价的三个关键因素,包括制备方法、球体大小和细胞活力。首先,比较了五种常用的球面制造平台,概述了它们的原理、优点和局限性。其次,它检查了球体大小变化的生物学因素,如细胞增殖、细胞凋亡、蛋白质表达和细胞分化,以及它们如何影响药物反应。第三,它讨论了缺氧核心发育和anoikis敏感性等特征如何影响细胞活力并可能扭曲毒性评估。这篇综述提出了一个概念性框架,以减少偏倚和提高基于球的药物筛选的可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
2.70%
发文量
1621
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy stands as a multidisciplinary journal, presenting a spectrum of original research reports, reviews, and communications in the realms of clinical and basic medicine, as well as pharmacology. The journal spans various fields, including Cancer, Nutriceutics, Neurodegenerative, Cardiac, and Infectious Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信