Exhaustive probabilistic risk assessment for space applications including common causes

IF 1.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Emilien Genet , Marco Giugliarelli
{"title":"Exhaustive probabilistic risk assessment for space applications including common causes","authors":"Emilien Genet ,&nbsp;Marco Giugliarelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jsse.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) is crucial in identifying causes and controls, and assessing residual risks in safety-critical industries. The Artemis mission aims to establish human safe permanence in space, necessitating adapted safety evaluation tools. NASA has led PRA complexity in space based on its manned flight history, while Europe lacks PRA standards like ECSS, despite mandatory Fault Tree Analyses (FTAs) for crewed missions. Thales Alenia Space proposes enhancing PRA modeling in FTAs by quantifying Common Cause Failure (CCF) events and integrating Safety mitigations in PRA. The proposed methodology improves estimates residual risks, with explicit CCF modeling over outdated approaches and specific tailoring for space vehicles and hazards. Proof on concepts on Gateway manned modules demonstrates benefits of this PRA approach for safety panels and industry, to minimize biases. Our results show the need for international consensus and standardizations on quantitative FTA methods for the space projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 396-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Safety Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468896725000758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) is crucial in identifying causes and controls, and assessing residual risks in safety-critical industries. The Artemis mission aims to establish human safe permanence in space, necessitating adapted safety evaluation tools. NASA has led PRA complexity in space based on its manned flight history, while Europe lacks PRA standards like ECSS, despite mandatory Fault Tree Analyses (FTAs) for crewed missions. Thales Alenia Space proposes enhancing PRA modeling in FTAs by quantifying Common Cause Failure (CCF) events and integrating Safety mitigations in PRA. The proposed methodology improves estimates residual risks, with explicit CCF modeling over outdated approaches and specific tailoring for space vehicles and hazards. Proof on concepts on Gateway manned modules demonstrates benefits of this PRA approach for safety panels and industry, to minimize biases. Our results show the need for international consensus and standardizations on quantitative FTA methods for the space projects.
空间应用的详尽概率风险评估,包括共同原因
概率风险评估(PRA)在确定原因和控制以及评估安全关键行业的剩余风险方面至关重要。阿尔忒弥斯任务的目标是建立人类在太空的安全持久性,需要适应的安全评估工具。基于其载人飞行历史,美国宇航局在太空领域的PRA复杂性处于领先地位,而欧洲缺乏像ECSS这样的PRA标准,尽管在载人任务中有强制性的故障树分析(FTAs)。泰雷兹阿莱尼亚空间公司建议通过量化共因故障(CCF)事件和整合PRA中的安全缓解措施来增强fta中的PRA建模。所提出的方法改进了剩余风险的估计,对过时的方法进行了明确的CCF建模,并对空间飞行器和危险进行了具体调整。网关载人模块的概念证明了这种PRA方法对安全面板和工业的好处,可以最大限度地减少偏差。我们的研究结果表明,需要对空间项目的定量FTA方法进行国际共识和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Space Safety Engineering
Journal of Space Safety Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信