Youth aging out of care and contact with the criminal justice system: the role of educational transitions in early adulthood

Abstract

Background

The process of transitioning of placement is marked by difficult transitions and is complicated by a history of placement experiences. Studies show that most young people who age out of placement care are enrolled in school just before they leave, but this proportion drops drastically soon after they leave care. This transition has the potential to increase the risk of being involved in the justice system. Conversely, staying in school after placement has the potential to prevent contact with the justice system.

Objective

To examine whether educational transitions during the process of leaving placement care in early adulthood influence the risk of justice system involvement. More precisely, the study focuses on whether leaving school increases this risk among youth aging out of care. It also uses moderation analyses to assess whether this association varies based on placement experiences, such as placement instability and group placement.

Participants and settings

We used a subsample of the EDJeP study from Québec, Canada, consisting of youths who participated in the third wave and who were in school before leaving placement (n = 413). Administrative data from youth protection services and data from the three waves of questionnaires were analyzed.

Methods

We used maximum likelihood logistic regression models to predict justice system involvement during early adulthood as a function of leaving school. Interaction terms were used to determine whether moderation effects were present.

Results

The results show that young people who leave school when they age out of placement are at greater risk of being involved in the justice system during early adulthood (OR = 4.55, p < 0.001). Conversely, young people who stayed in school after aging out of care were less likely to be involved in the justice system during early adulthood. However, there were no significant moderation effects (p > 0.05) with the placement experiences.