Transforming underutilized urban spaces into green infrastructure in Global South cities: A systematic review

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Amal Saleh Mohammed Al hothaufi , Yike Hu , Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi , Nour El Houda Ben Ameur , Ghada A. Alssadah , Haitham A. Ashah
{"title":"Transforming underutilized urban spaces into green infrastructure in Global South cities: A systematic review","authors":"Amal Saleh Mohammed Al hothaufi ,&nbsp;Yike Hu ,&nbsp;Akram Ahmed Noman Alabsi ,&nbsp;Nour El Houda Ben Ameur ,&nbsp;Ghada A. Alssadah ,&nbsp;Haitham A. Ashah","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization in cities of the Global South has exacerbated environmental degradation and escalated pressure on land resources, leading to intricate challenges regarding sustainability, liveability, and equity. Repurposing underutilized land into multifunctional green infrastructure (GI) is urgent. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025, following the PRISMA protocol, to evaluate planning frameworks and methodological approaches for such transformations. The reviewed literature, covering case studies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, primarily focuses on brownfields, vacant lots, and underused public spaces. Analysis reveals four thematic clusters: (1) spatial analysis and site identification, (2) participatory and community-led planning, (3) governance and policy mechanisms, and (4) multifunctionality in GI strategies. Key gaps include the absence of a unified definition of “underutilized” spaces, reliance on static spatial datasets that overlook informal land use and changing vacancy patterns, and limited integration of justice dimensions specifically social, spatial, and procedural justice into GI planning. To address these gaps, the review recommends: (a) creating standardized classification systems that incorporate land tenure, contamination status, and historical use to counter definitional inconsistencies; (b) using hybrid geospatial data that integrate the temporal, spectral, and morphological dimensions data to overcome limitations of static datasets; and (c) prioritizing GI interventions in marginalized and high-risk communities to embed justice considerations. Finally, to overcome weak governance frameworks, inclusive models should be institutionalized to support co-design, prevent displacement, and strengthen resilience. These recommendations underscore the need for justice-oriented, context-specific GI strategies that reflect the socio-spatial and ecological complexities of Global South cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 106816"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in cities of the Global South has exacerbated environmental degradation and escalated pressure on land resources, leading to intricate challenges regarding sustainability, liveability, and equity. Repurposing underutilized land into multifunctional green infrastructure (GI) is urgent. This systematic review synthesizes findings from 30 peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and 2025, following the PRISMA protocol, to evaluate planning frameworks and methodological approaches for such transformations. The reviewed literature, covering case studies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, primarily focuses on brownfields, vacant lots, and underused public spaces. Analysis reveals four thematic clusters: (1) spatial analysis and site identification, (2) participatory and community-led planning, (3) governance and policy mechanisms, and (4) multifunctionality in GI strategies. Key gaps include the absence of a unified definition of “underutilized” spaces, reliance on static spatial datasets that overlook informal land use and changing vacancy patterns, and limited integration of justice dimensions specifically social, spatial, and procedural justice into GI planning. To address these gaps, the review recommends: (a) creating standardized classification systems that incorporate land tenure, contamination status, and historical use to counter definitional inconsistencies; (b) using hybrid geospatial data that integrate the temporal, spectral, and morphological dimensions data to overcome limitations of static datasets; and (c) prioritizing GI interventions in marginalized and high-risk communities to embed justice considerations. Finally, to overcome weak governance frameworks, inclusive models should be institutionalized to support co-design, prevent displacement, and strengthen resilience. These recommendations underscore the need for justice-oriented, context-specific GI strategies that reflect the socio-spatial and ecological complexities of Global South cities.
将未充分利用的城市空间转化为绿色基础设施:系统回顾
全球南方城市的快速城市化加剧了环境退化,加大了对土地资源的压力,在可持续性、宜居性和公平性方面带来了复杂的挑战。将未充分利用的土地改造成多功能绿色基础设施(GI)迫在眉睫。本系统综述综合了2014年至2025年间发表的30项同行评议研究的结果,遵循PRISMA协议,评估了此类转变的规划框架和方法方法。文献综述涵盖了非洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲的案例研究,主要关注棕地、空地和未充分利用的公共空间。分析揭示了四个主题集群:(1)空间分析和场地识别,(2)参与性和社区主导的规划,(3)治理和政策机制,以及(4)地理标志战略的多功能。主要差距包括缺乏对“未充分利用”空间的统一定义,依赖于忽视非正式土地利用和不断变化的空缺模式的静态空间数据集,以及将正义维度,特别是社会、空间和程序正义纳入地理标志规划的程度有限。为了解决这些差距,审查建议:(a)建立标准化分类系统,将土地权属、污染状况和历史使用纳入其中,以消除定义上的不一致;(b)利用结合时间、光谱和形态维度数据的混合地理空间数据,克服静态数据集的局限性;(c)优先考虑边缘化和高风险社区的地理标志干预措施,以纳入司法考虑。最后,为克服治理框架薄弱的问题,应将包容性模式制度化,以支持共同设计、防止流离失所和增强韧性。这些建议强调需要以正义为导向,根据具体情况制定地理标志战略,以反映全球南方城市的社会空间和生态复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信