Revisiting the relationship between information literacy and academic writing: Evidence from a self-assessment scale

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Chengyuan Yu
{"title":"Revisiting the relationship between information literacy and academic writing: Evidence from a self-assessment scale","authors":"Chengyuan Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although information literacy and academic writing have been considered associated abilities in the higher education context, the degree to which these two abilities are associated remains inconclusive. To add empirical evidence on the relationship between information literacy and academic writing, the present study drew on graduate students' responses to a self-assessment scale that measures the abilities of information literacy and academic writing processes and examined their relationship at the integrated and individual process levels. The two integrated constructs are highly correlated with a correlation coefficient of 0.815. The individual processes of information literacy and academic writing are correlated with moderately high to high coefficients, ranging from 0.548 to 0.755, which means that the processes of information literacy and academic writing are closely related. Evaluating and understanding information in information literacy processes are more associated with writing processes, suggesting that they are crucial in connecting these two constructs and making them an integrated process. This study is original in using a scale that treats information literacy and academic writing as an integrated process to reflect the real-world situation and goes beyond the textual evaluation of these two abilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","volume":"51 6","pages":"Article 103138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009913332500134X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although information literacy and academic writing have been considered associated abilities in the higher education context, the degree to which these two abilities are associated remains inconclusive. To add empirical evidence on the relationship between information literacy and academic writing, the present study drew on graduate students' responses to a self-assessment scale that measures the abilities of information literacy and academic writing processes and examined their relationship at the integrated and individual process levels. The two integrated constructs are highly correlated with a correlation coefficient of 0.815. The individual processes of information literacy and academic writing are correlated with moderately high to high coefficients, ranging from 0.548 to 0.755, which means that the processes of information literacy and academic writing are closely related. Evaluating and understanding information in information literacy processes are more associated with writing processes, suggesting that they are crucial in connecting these two constructs and making them an integrated process. This study is original in using a scale that treats information literacy and academic writing as an integrated process to reflect the real-world situation and goes beyond the textual evaluation of these two abilities.
重新审视信息素养与学术写作之间的关系:来自自我评估量表的证据
虽然在高等教育背景下,信息素养和学术写作被认为是相关的能力,但这两种能力的关联程度仍然没有定论。为了增加信息素养与学术写作之间关系的经验证据,本研究利用了研究生对信息素养与学术写作过程能力的自我评估量表的反应,并在综合和个人过程水平上考察了它们之间的关系。两个综合构念高度相关,相关系数为0.815。信息素养与学术写作的个体过程呈中高到高的相关系数,范围为0.548 ~ 0.755,说明信息素养与学术写作的过程密切相关。信息素养过程中的信息评估和理解更多地与写作过程相关,这表明它们在连接这两个结构并使其成为一个综合过程中至关重要。本研究独创地使用量表,将信息素养与学术写作作为一个综合过程来反映现实情境,并超越了对这两种能力的文本评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Journal of Academic Librarianship INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Academic Librarianship, an international and refereed journal, publishes articles that focus on problems and issues germane to college and university libraries. JAL provides a forum for authors to present research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance; analyze policies, practices, issues, and trends; speculate about the future of academic librarianship; present analytical bibliographic essays and philosophical treatises. JAL also brings to the attention of its readers information about hundreds of new and recently published books in library and information science, management, scholarly communication, and higher education. JAL, in addition, covers management and discipline-based software and information policy developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信