Participation in standardization and firm innovation performance: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis

IF 9.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115710

Shanshan Wang , Jing Li , Tianyi Zhao

{"title":"Participation in standardization and firm innovation performance: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis","authors":"Shanshan Wang , Jing Li , Tianyi Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Participation in standardization (PIS) is an effective means for firms to facilitate innovation. However, existing studies fail to incorporate the PIS characteristics of participation frequency and depth into different patterns to examine their differentiated effects on firm innovation performance. Based on knowledge-based theory (KBT), this study employs polynomial regression with response surface analysis to investigate the differentiated effects of four PIS patterns on firm innovation performance under knowledge recombination. The differentiated effects of the four PIS patterns stem from the variation in the amount of two types of knowledge that firms acquire via PIS. Moreover, two knowledge recombination behaviors, recombinant creation and reuse, moderate the relationship between PIS and firm innovation performance. This study enriches the research on PIS patterns and effects, adds new insights to the KBT and knowledge recombination literature, and provides guidance for firms to utilize PIS to improve innovation performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 115710"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005338","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation in standardization (PIS) is an effective means for firms to facilitate innovation. However, existing studies fail to incorporate the PIS characteristics of participation frequency and depth into different patterns to examine their differentiated effects on firm innovation performance. Based on knowledge-based theory (KBT), this study employs polynomial regression with response surface analysis to investigate the differentiated effects of four PIS patterns on firm innovation performance under knowledge recombination. The differentiated effects of the four PIS patterns stem from the variation in the amount of two types of knowledge that firms acquire via PIS. Moreover, two knowledge recombination behaviors, recombinant creation and reuse, moderate the relationship between PIS and firm innovation performance. This study enriches the research on PIS patterns and effects, adds new insights to the KBT and knowledge recombination literature, and provides guidance for firms to utilize PIS to improve innovation performance.

查看原文本刊更多论文

标准化参与与企业创新绩效：响应面分析的多项式回归

参与标准化是企业促进创新的有效手段。然而，现有的研究未能将PIS参与频率和深度的特征纳入不同的模式中，以检验它们对企业创新绩效的差异影响。本文基于知识基础理论，采用多项式回归和响应面分析方法，探讨了知识重组下四种PIS模式对企业创新绩效的差异效应。四种PIS模式的差异效应源于企业通过PIS获得的两类知识数量的变化。重组创造和重用两种知识重组行为对企业创新绩效的影响具有调节作用。本研究丰富了企业绩效信息系统的模式和效应研究，为企业利用企业绩效信息系统提高创新绩效提供了新的视角，为企业利用企业绩效信息系统提高创新绩效提供了指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Business Research BUSINESS-

CiteScore

20.30

自引率

10.60%

发文量

956

期刊介绍： The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.