Divergent carbon emission mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Heterogeneous effects of the digital economy in urban centers versus boundary regions

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Langang Feng , Jiaxing Lu , Jin Hu , Muhammad Irfan , Kaiya Wu
{"title":"Divergent carbon emission mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Heterogeneous effects of the digital economy in urban centers versus boundary regions","authors":"Langang Feng ,&nbsp;Jiaxing Lu ,&nbsp;Jin Hu ,&nbsp;Muhammad Irfan ,&nbsp;Kaiya Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant disparities in economic structure and environmental governance between urban centers and boundary areas underscore the need to explore spatially differentiated carbon reduction (CR) mechanisms enabled by the digital economy (DE). Leveraging panel data from 279 Chinese cities (2011–2022), this study employs machine learning models, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and econometric analysis to dissect the heterogeneous CR effects of DE subsystems across urban functional zones. Results reveal a pronounced “central effect”, where DE-driven carbon mitigation is substantially stronger in urban centers than in boundary areas. Key drivers include telecommunications development (TDI) and digital finance (DFI), contributing 0.76 and -0.19 to central effect of CR, respectively, while internet penetration (IPI) and digital talent (DTI) exhibit limited impacts. Notably, resource-based cities and regions at lower administrative tiers benefit disproportionately from DE’s CR potential, whereas high-innovation cities show diminished spatial disparities due to balanced digital adoption. These findings challenge the homogeneous treatment of DE in existing literature and provide actionable insights for policymakers and corporate strategists to design spatially targeted green policies. By aligning digital infrastructure investments with regional industrial characteristics and prioritizing DFI-TDI synergies, cities can amplify DE’s role in achieving climate goals while addressing core-periphery inequities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 106808"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221067072500681X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant disparities in economic structure and environmental governance between urban centers and boundary areas underscore the need to explore spatially differentiated carbon reduction (CR) mechanisms enabled by the digital economy (DE). Leveraging panel data from 279 Chinese cities (2011–2022), this study employs machine learning models, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and econometric analysis to dissect the heterogeneous CR effects of DE subsystems across urban functional zones. Results reveal a pronounced “central effect”, where DE-driven carbon mitigation is substantially stronger in urban centers than in boundary areas. Key drivers include telecommunications development (TDI) and digital finance (DFI), contributing 0.76 and -0.19 to central effect of CR, respectively, while internet penetration (IPI) and digital talent (DTI) exhibit limited impacts. Notably, resource-based cities and regions at lower administrative tiers benefit disproportionately from DE’s CR potential, whereas high-innovation cities show diminished spatial disparities due to balanced digital adoption. These findings challenge the homogeneous treatment of DE in existing literature and provide actionable insights for policymakers and corporate strategists to design spatially targeted green policies. By aligning digital infrastructure investments with regional industrial characteristics and prioritizing DFI-TDI synergies, cities can amplify DE’s role in achieving climate goals while addressing core-periphery inequities.
走向可持续发展的不同碳减排路径:城市中心与边界地区数字经济的异质效应
城市中心和边界地区之间经济结构和环境治理的显著差异凸显了探索数字经济驱动下的空间差别化碳减排机制的必要性。利用279个中国城市(2011-2022年)的面板数据,本研究采用机器学习模型、SHapley加性解释(SHAP)和计量经济学分析来剖析城市功能区DE子系统的异质性CR效应。结果显示了明显的“中心效应”,即de驱动的碳缓解在城市中心比在边界地区强得多。主要驱动因素包括电信发展(TDI)和数字金融(DFI),对企业社会责任中心效应的贡献分别为0.76和-0.19,而互联网普及率(IPI)和数字人才(DTI)的影响有限。值得注意的是,处于较低行政级别的资源型城市和地区从DE的CR潜力中受益不成比例,而高创新城市由于平衡的数字采用而显示出缩小的空间差异。这些发现挑战了现有文献中对DE的同质化处理,并为政策制定者和企业战略家设计具有空间针对性的绿色政策提供了可行的见解。通过将数字基础设施投资与区域产业特征相结合,并优先考虑DFI-TDI的协同效应,城市可以在解决核心与边缘不平等的同时,扩大数字基础设施在实现气候目标方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信