{"title":"“Graffiti” on protective gear in China's Covidscape: Mediated actions, affective regimes and resemiotization","authors":"Ran Liao , Brian Hok-Shing Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2025.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 lockdown in China, frontline healthcare workers handwrote their names on protective gear for identification, often accompanied with slogans and images. Based on a dataset of 306 photographs, this research investigates the social actions performed through these “graffiti”, analyzing how they construct affective regimes and resemiotize the protective gear and healthcare workers. Five social actions are identified, namely, boosting public morale and social cohesion, enhancing the health workers’ own morale, envisioning the future, engaging in community celebrations, and, lastly, expressing love and longing. The affective regimes constructed include solidarity, pride and empathy, which mitigate tensions due to the unequal power relationship between healthcare workers and the public. The graffiti transforms the protective gear from a symbol of alienation and power inequality to one affording communication and friendship; it also turns the healthcare workers from symbols of health threats and power to peers and relatable individuals. Specific to the China context, these graffiti prominently reflect collectivist thinking, contrasting with individualized expressions in Covidscape elsewhere or other types of graffiti discourse. Moreover, metaphors of WAR and WINTER are always used to frame the COVID-19 crisis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47575,"journal":{"name":"Language & Communication","volume":"105 ","pages":"Pages 37-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530925000850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the COVID-19 lockdown in China, frontline healthcare workers handwrote their names on protective gear for identification, often accompanied with slogans and images. Based on a dataset of 306 photographs, this research investigates the social actions performed through these “graffiti”, analyzing how they construct affective regimes and resemiotize the protective gear and healthcare workers. Five social actions are identified, namely, boosting public morale and social cohesion, enhancing the health workers’ own morale, envisioning the future, engaging in community celebrations, and, lastly, expressing love and longing. The affective regimes constructed include solidarity, pride and empathy, which mitigate tensions due to the unequal power relationship between healthcare workers and the public. The graffiti transforms the protective gear from a symbol of alienation and power inequality to one affording communication and friendship; it also turns the healthcare workers from symbols of health threats and power to peers and relatable individuals. Specific to the China context, these graffiti prominently reflect collectivist thinking, contrasting with individualized expressions in Covidscape elsewhere or other types of graffiti discourse. Moreover, metaphors of WAR and WINTER are always used to frame the COVID-19 crisis.
期刊介绍:
This journal is unique in that it provides a forum devoted to the interdisciplinary study of language and communication. The investigation of language and its communicational functions is treated as a concern shared in common by those working in applied linguistics, child development, cultural studies, discourse analysis, intellectual history, legal studies, language evolution, linguistic anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, the politics of language, pragmatics, psychology, rhetoric, semiotics, and sociolinguistics. The journal invites contributions which explore the implications of current research for establishing common theoretical frameworks within which findings from different areas of study may be accommodated and interrelated. By focusing attention on the many ways in which language is integrated with other forms of communicational activity and interactional behaviour, it is intended to encourage approaches to the study of language and communication which are not restricted by existing disciplinary boundaries.