Relative power to velocity variation: A new quantification method for assessing swimming kinematics

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Aléxia Fernandes , João Paulo Vilas-Boas , Ricardo J. Fernandes , Bruno Mezêncio
{"title":"Relative power to velocity variation: A new quantification method for assessing swimming kinematics","authors":"Aléxia Fernandes ,&nbsp;João Paulo Vilas-Boas ,&nbsp;Ricardo J. Fernandes ,&nbsp;Bruno Mezêncio","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Velocity variation in swimming is commonly assessed using quantification methods that fail to consider the movement mechanical nature in the aquatic environment. The current study proposes the relative power to velocity variation method to evaluate the velocity variation effect in efficiency, accounting the swimmers hydrodynamic drag into the calculation. Twenty regional level swimmers (12 males) performed three 25 m front crawl trials (one at 88 and other at 100 % of their maximum velocity, and another at maximum pace using the velocity perturbation method). Mean, maximum and minimum velocities, stroke rate, length and index, and indexes of coordination and synchronization were obtained for each cycle. The power to overcome drag, power to velocity variation, total mechanical power, intracycle velocity variation (assessed by the coefficient of variation) and difference between maximum and minimum absolute velocities were also computed. Power regressions were performed between mean velocity, standard deviation and the absolute and relative power to velocity variation. Results showed that the absolute and relative power to velocity variation values increased (a = 2.82, b = 1) and decreased (a = 0.07, b = −2.00, respectively) with the mean velocity increment, while both rose with mean velocity standard deviation (a = 142.31, b = 2.00 and a = 1.14, b = 2.00, respectively). The relative power to velocity variation method offers an advanced understanding of front crawl efficiency and enables predicting its effect on overall swimming performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025004828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Velocity variation in swimming is commonly assessed using quantification methods that fail to consider the movement mechanical nature in the aquatic environment. The current study proposes the relative power to velocity variation method to evaluate the velocity variation effect in efficiency, accounting the swimmers hydrodynamic drag into the calculation. Twenty regional level swimmers (12 males) performed three 25 m front crawl trials (one at 88 and other at 100 % of their maximum velocity, and another at maximum pace using the velocity perturbation method). Mean, maximum and minimum velocities, stroke rate, length and index, and indexes of coordination and synchronization were obtained for each cycle. The power to overcome drag, power to velocity variation, total mechanical power, intracycle velocity variation (assessed by the coefficient of variation) and difference between maximum and minimum absolute velocities were also computed. Power regressions were performed between mean velocity, standard deviation and the absolute and relative power to velocity variation. Results showed that the absolute and relative power to velocity variation values increased (a = 2.82, b = 1) and decreased (a = 0.07, b = −2.00, respectively) with the mean velocity increment, while both rose with mean velocity standard deviation (a = 142.31, b = 2.00 and a = 1.14, b = 2.00, respectively). The relative power to velocity variation method offers an advanced understanding of front crawl efficiency and enables predicting its effect on overall swimming performance.
速度变化的相对力量:一种评估游泳运动学的新的量化方法
通常使用量化方法来评估游泳中的速度变化,而这些方法没有考虑水中环境中的运动力学性质。本研究提出了相对功率与速度变化的方法来评价速度变化对效率的影响,并将游泳者的水动力阻力纳入计算。20名地区水平游泳运动员(12名男性)进行了3次25米自由泳试验(一次以88米速度,另一次以100%最大速度,另一次以速度摄动法的最大配速)。得到每个周期的平均、最大、最小速度、冲程速率、长度和指数、协调性和同步性指标。还计算了克服阻力的功率、速度变化的功率、总机械功率、周期内速度变化(由变化系数评估)以及最大和最小绝对速度之差。在平均速度、标准差和速度变化的绝对和相对功率之间进行幂回归。结果表明:随着平均速度的增加,速度变化值的绝对功率和相对功率分别增大(a = 2.82, b = 1)和减小(a = 0.07, b =−2.00);随着平均速度标准差的增加,绝对功率和相对功率分别增大(a = 142.31, b = 2.00和a = 1.14, b = 2.00)。相对力量与速度变化方法提供了对前爬泳效率的深入了解,并能够预测其对整体游泳表现的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信