Vulnerability assessment of smallholder farmers to climate change in the Awash Basin, Ethiopia

IF 5.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ethiopia Bisrat Zeleke , Mebruk Mohammed , Belete Berhanu Kidanewold
{"title":"Vulnerability assessment of smallholder farmers to climate change in the Awash Basin, Ethiopia","authors":"Ethiopia Bisrat Zeleke ,&nbsp;Mebruk Mohammed ,&nbsp;Belete Berhanu Kidanewold","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Smallholder farmers in Ethiopia's Awash River Basin face escalating climate risks that threaten water resources and livelihoods. This study quantifies vulnerability using an indicator-based framework of 15 indicators—six for exposure, four for sensitivity, and five for adaptive capacity. Indicator weights were derived through Principal Component Analysis, and vulnerability was mapped at 0.1° resolution. Temporal indicators (climate variables, vegetation health) were assessed monthly from 1981 to 2019, while static indicators drew from recent remote sensing products, reanalysis datasets, and national surveys. The analysis encompassed diverse production systems, including highland cropping, lowland pastoral, and mixed crop-livestock livelihoods.</div><div>Findings show a rising vulnerability trend, with severe years (1984, 1991, 2002, 2007–2009, 2011–2012, 2015, 2017) when up to 80 % of the basin faced moderate to high risk. Validation against drought records, crop yield data, and NDVI-based vegetation stress confirmed strong consistency (recall &gt;0.75) in identifying vulnerable periods. Cropping systems were the most exposed, while pastoral systems exhibited relatively greater resilience. Lowland areas, despite high climate exposure, benefited from irrigation and larger landholdings, improving adaptive capacity. The results further highlight pervasive climate vulnerability across the past four decades. For pastoralists, improved rangeland access can reduce risk, while irrigation infrastructure remains the most decisive factor for building resilience in cropping systems. Tailored regional strategies—expanding irrigation, safeguarding rangelands, and enhancing adaptive capacity—are critical for reducing vulnerability and supporting sustainable livelihoods in the Awash Basin.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100927"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smallholder farmers in Ethiopia's Awash River Basin face escalating climate risks that threaten water resources and livelihoods. This study quantifies vulnerability using an indicator-based framework of 15 indicators—six for exposure, four for sensitivity, and five for adaptive capacity. Indicator weights were derived through Principal Component Analysis, and vulnerability was mapped at 0.1° resolution. Temporal indicators (climate variables, vegetation health) were assessed monthly from 1981 to 2019, while static indicators drew from recent remote sensing products, reanalysis datasets, and national surveys. The analysis encompassed diverse production systems, including highland cropping, lowland pastoral, and mixed crop-livestock livelihoods.
Findings show a rising vulnerability trend, with severe years (1984, 1991, 2002, 2007–2009, 2011–2012, 2015, 2017) when up to 80 % of the basin faced moderate to high risk. Validation against drought records, crop yield data, and NDVI-based vegetation stress confirmed strong consistency (recall >0.75) in identifying vulnerable periods. Cropping systems were the most exposed, while pastoral systems exhibited relatively greater resilience. Lowland areas, despite high climate exposure, benefited from irrigation and larger landholdings, improving adaptive capacity. The results further highlight pervasive climate vulnerability across the past four decades. For pastoralists, improved rangeland access can reduce risk, while irrigation infrastructure remains the most decisive factor for building resilience in cropping systems. Tailored regional strategies—expanding irrigation, safeguarding rangelands, and enhancing adaptive capacity—are critical for reducing vulnerability and supporting sustainable livelihoods in the Awash Basin.
埃塞俄比亚阿瓦什盆地小农对气候变化的脆弱性评估
埃塞俄比亚阿瓦什河流域的小农面临着日益加剧的气候风险,威胁着水资源和生计。本研究使用一个基于15个指标的框架来量化脆弱性,其中6个是暴露,4个是敏感性,5个是适应能力。通过主成分分析得出指标权重,并以0.1°分辨率绘制脆弱性图。从1981年到2019年,每月评估时间指标(气候变量、植被健康),而静态指标则来自最近的遥感产品、再分析数据集和国家调查。该分析涵盖了多种生产系统,包括高原种植、低地放牧和作物-牲畜混合生计。结果表明,流域脆弱性呈上升趋势,在1984年、1991年、2002年、2007-2009年、2011-2012年、2015年和2017年的严重年份,流域80%以上的地区面临中至高风险。针对干旱记录、作物产量数据和基于ndvi的植被胁迫的验证证实,在识别脆弱期方面具有很强的一致性(召回率>;0.75)。种植系统受到的影响最大,而牧区系统则表现出相对更强的恢复能力。低地地区尽管气候暴露程度高,但受益于灌溉和更大的土地拥有量,从而提高了适应能力。研究结果进一步强调了过去40年来普遍存在的气候脆弱性。对于牧民来说,改善牧场通道可以降低风险,而灌溉基础设施仍然是建设种植系统抗灾能力的最决定性因素。量身定制的区域战略——扩大灌溉、保护牧场和增强适应能力——对于减少阿瓦什盆地的脆弱性和支持可持续生计至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信