Analyzing the environmental impact of agricultural production in Africa through a comprehensive spatial econometric framework

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Regret Sunge , Delphin Kamanda Espoir
{"title":"Analyzing the environmental impact of agricultural production in Africa through a comprehensive spatial econometric framework","authors":"Regret Sunge ,&nbsp;Delphin Kamanda Espoir","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the environmental impacts of agricultural production in Africa, focusing on the continent's challenge of sustainably feeding a rapidly growing, food-insecure population. The study presents new evidence on three disaggregated sectors-crop, livestock, and fishery, using a fully modified agricultural-induced Environmental Kuznets Curve (AEKC) framework anchored on the Stochastic Impact by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model. Using data from 50 countries (1990–2021), environmental quality is assessed through the agricultural total ecological footprint (ATEFP), measured in global hectares. The Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) is employed to assess spatial dependence and spillover effects. Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA) reveals strong ecological spillovers between neighboring countries, highlighting proximity's influence on ecological outcomes. A 1 % increase in a country's agricultural output raises its ecological footprint by 0.543 % and its neighbors' by 0.0469 %. While the traditional Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is rejected, the AEKC is confirmed, suggesting that environmental improvements can eventually occur with continued agricultural growth. The sectoral analysis reveals varying environmental impacts: the standard EKC is observed exclusively in the fishery sector, while the AEKC is validated solely in the crop sector. The animal sector is U-shaped, becoming significant in the long run. Given spatial dependence, the study recommends deepening of agricultural regional integration and increased incorporation of agriculture in Paris Agreement related national development frameworks. Furthermore, policymakers should adopt sector-specific, spatially sensitive strategies that support a transition toward sustainable and resilient agricultural systems across the continent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108183"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003804","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the environmental impacts of agricultural production in Africa, focusing on the continent's challenge of sustainably feeding a rapidly growing, food-insecure population. The study presents new evidence on three disaggregated sectors-crop, livestock, and fishery, using a fully modified agricultural-induced Environmental Kuznets Curve (AEKC) framework anchored on the Stochastic Impact by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) model. Using data from 50 countries (1990–2021), environmental quality is assessed through the agricultural total ecological footprint (ATEFP), measured in global hectares. The Spatial Durbin Model (SDM) is employed to assess spatial dependence and spillover effects. Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis (ESDA) reveals strong ecological spillovers between neighboring countries, highlighting proximity's influence on ecological outcomes. A 1 % increase in a country's agricultural output raises its ecological footprint by 0.543 % and its neighbors' by 0.0469 %. While the traditional Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis is rejected, the AEKC is confirmed, suggesting that environmental improvements can eventually occur with continued agricultural growth. The sectoral analysis reveals varying environmental impacts: the standard EKC is observed exclusively in the fishery sector, while the AEKC is validated solely in the crop sector. The animal sector is U-shaped, becoming significant in the long run. Given spatial dependence, the study recommends deepening of agricultural regional integration and increased incorporation of agriculture in Paris Agreement related national development frameworks. Furthermore, policymakers should adopt sector-specific, spatially sensitive strategies that support a transition toward sustainable and resilient agricultural systems across the continent.
通过综合空间计量经济学框架分析非洲农业生产对环境的影响
本研究调查了非洲农业生产对环境的影响,重点关注非洲大陆面临的可持续养活快速增长、粮食不安全人口的挑战。该研究利用基于人口、富裕和技术回归随机影响(STIRPAT)模型的完全改进的农业诱发环境库兹涅茨曲线(AEKC)框架,提出了关于作物、畜牧业和渔业这三个细分部门的新证据。利用来自50个国家(1990-2021年)的数据,通过以全球公顷为单位的农业总生态足迹(ATEFP)来评估环境质量。采用空间Durbin模型(Spatial Durbin Model, SDM)评估空间依赖性和溢出效应。探索性空间数据分析(ESDA)揭示了邻国之间的生态溢出效应,突出了邻近性对生态结果的影响。一个国家的农业产量每增加1%,其生态足迹将增加0.543%,其邻国的生态足迹将增加0.0469%。虽然传统的环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假设被拒绝,但AEKC假设得到了证实,这表明环境改善最终会随着农业的持续增长而发生。部门分析揭示了不同的环境影响:标准EKC仅在渔业部门观察到,而AEKC仅在作物部门得到验证。动物行业呈u形,从长远来看会变得很重要。考虑到空间依赖性,该研究建议深化农业区域一体化,并将农业更多地纳入与《巴黎协定》相关的国家发展框架。此外,政策制定者应采取针对特定部门、具有空间敏感性的战略,支持整个非洲大陆向可持续和有复原力的农业系统过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信