Achieving economic and environmental stewardship in maize farming through legume integration and nitrogen management: impact on productivity-profitability-energy-carbon footprints
{"title":"Achieving economic and environmental stewardship in maize farming through legume integration and nitrogen management: impact on productivity-profitability-energy-carbon footprints","authors":"Khushboo Devi , Subhash Babu , Sanjay Singh Rathore , Rishi Raj , Aastika Pandey , Ananya Gairola , Vipin Kumar , Md Yeasin , Raghavendra Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2025.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low productivity, poor economic returns, and energy intensiveness often question the sustainability of conventional maize production systems. The experiment was arranged in a three-times-replicated split-plot design by assigning four maize + legume integrations: sole maize, maize + cowpea, maize + black gram, and maize + <em>Sesbania</em> in the main plot and three nitrogen (N) management practices, i.e., recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN; 150 N kg ha<sup>−1</sup>), 125 % RDN, and 75 % RDN, in subplots. Results revealed that the maize + cowpea with RDN recorded 40.7 % higher system productivity over sole maize with RDN. The maize + cowpea with an RDN had the highest net return (1438.83 US$ ha<sup>−1</sup>). Likewise, co-culturing of cowpea with maize resulted in 36.59 % higher energy productivity with 26.1 % lesser specific energy over sole maize. The RDN recorded higher net energy (74.65 GJ ha<sup>−1</sup>) than other N management options. The maize+cowpea system with 75 % RDN recorded ∼16.7 % higher energy use efficiency compared to the maize+cowpea with RDN. Concerning C output, maize+cowpea registered ∼1.4 times higher C return than sole maize. Co-culturing of cowpea with maize recorded the lowest carbon footprint on energy (20.67 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq GJ<sup>−1</sup>), productivity (0.304 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq kg<sup>−1</sup>), and economic (1.41 kg CO<sub>2</sub>eq US$<sup>−1</sup>) scales over the rest. Likewise, reducing N doses by 25 % resulted in the least carbon footprint. The maize+cowpea system had maximum eco-efficiency (EE; 0.728 US$ kg GHG<sup>−1</sup>). Among N management options, application of 75 % RDN registered the maximum EE. Hence, policy recommendations should focus on scaling up of maize + cowpea with optimized N management as a climate smart production model in semiarid agroecosystems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100934"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972725003551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Low productivity, poor economic returns, and energy intensiveness often question the sustainability of conventional maize production systems. The experiment was arranged in a three-times-replicated split-plot design by assigning four maize + legume integrations: sole maize, maize + cowpea, maize + black gram, and maize + Sesbania in the main plot and three nitrogen (N) management practices, i.e., recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN; 150 N kg ha−1), 125 % RDN, and 75 % RDN, in subplots. Results revealed that the maize + cowpea with RDN recorded 40.7 % higher system productivity over sole maize with RDN. The maize + cowpea with an RDN had the highest net return (1438.83 US$ ha−1). Likewise, co-culturing of cowpea with maize resulted in 36.59 % higher energy productivity with 26.1 % lesser specific energy over sole maize. The RDN recorded higher net energy (74.65 GJ ha−1) than other N management options. The maize+cowpea system with 75 % RDN recorded ∼16.7 % higher energy use efficiency compared to the maize+cowpea with RDN. Concerning C output, maize+cowpea registered ∼1.4 times higher C return than sole maize. Co-culturing of cowpea with maize recorded the lowest carbon footprint on energy (20.67 kg CO2eq GJ−1), productivity (0.304 kg CO2eq kg−1), and economic (1.41 kg CO2eq US$−1) scales over the rest. Likewise, reducing N doses by 25 % resulted in the least carbon footprint. The maize+cowpea system had maximum eco-efficiency (EE; 0.728 US$ kg GHG−1). Among N management options, application of 75 % RDN registered the maximum EE. Hence, policy recommendations should focus on scaling up of maize + cowpea with optimized N management as a climate smart production model in semiarid agroecosystems.
低生产率、低经济回报和能源密集往往对传统玉米生产系统的可持续性提出质疑。试验采用3次重复的分畦设计,在主小区采用4种玉米+豆类组合:单玉米、玉米+豇豆、玉米+黑克和玉米+田籽,在次小区采用3种氮素管理方式,即推荐施氮量(RDN: 150 N kg ha - 1)、125% RDN和75% RDN。结果表明,玉米+豇豆配以RDN比单配玉米增产40.7%。采用RDN的玉米+豇豆的净收益最高(1438.83美元/公顷)。与单作玉米相比,豇豆与玉米混栽能产率提高36.59%,比能降低26.1%。RDN的净能量(74.65 GJ ha−1)高于其他N管理方案。与含有RDN的玉米+豇豆相比,含有75% RDN的玉米+豇豆系统的能源利用效率提高了约16.7%。就碳产量而言,玉米+豇豆的碳收益比单玉米高1.4倍。豇豆与玉米共栽培在能源(20.67 kg co2当量GJ−1)、生产力(0.304 kg co2当量kg−1)和经济(1.41 kg co2当量US$−1)方面的碳足迹最低。同样,减少25%的氮剂量导致的碳足迹最少。玉米+豇豆系统的生态效率最高(EE; 0.728 US$ kg GHG−1)。在N个管理选项中,75% RDN的应用获得了最大的EE。因此,政策建议应侧重于扩大玉米+豇豆的种植规模,优化氮素管理,作为半干旱农业生态系统的气候智能型生产模式。