Caren C. Dymond , Michelle Venter , Erica Lilles , Luizmar De Assis Barros , Ingrid Farnell , Kristen Hirsh-Pearson , Juan Pablo Ramírez-Delgado , Oscar Venter
{"title":"Reducing logging intensity in north temperate rainforests for climate and economic benefits","authors":"Caren C. Dymond , Michelle Venter , Erica Lilles , Luizmar De Assis Barros , Ingrid Farnell , Kristen Hirsh-Pearson , Juan Pablo Ramírez-Delgado , Oscar Venter","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interior temperate rainforest’s role as a global carbon sink conflicts with lucrative logging revenues. Yet, the relationship between the proportion of trees harvested and whole-ecosystem carbon flux is still unclear. In a large, replicated trial in western Canada, we monitored carbon in the ecosystem and wood products in response to logging of varying intensity: clearcuts, light and heavy partial-cuts, and no harvest. Averaged over the 26 years, net-CO<sub>2</sub>e yr<sup>−1</sup> emissions increased linearly with logging intensity (R<sup>2</sup>=0.80 for mature stands). Unharvested stands were sinks (2.2 ± 1.9 MgCO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>; mean ± standard deviation) and clearcuts were sources (-21 ± 11 MgCO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>), whereas light partial-cuts almost recovered their pre-harvest carbon (-2.9 ± 2.7 MgCO<sub>2</sub>e ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>). An economic exercise suggests that partially or fully retaining mature trees in interior temperate rainforests can help meet 2050 ‘net-zero’ targets while still providing economic benefits greater than logging if emissions are priced above ∼CAD65 $ MgCO<sub>2</sub>e<sup>−1</sup>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006711","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interior temperate rainforest’s role as a global carbon sink conflicts with lucrative logging revenues. Yet, the relationship between the proportion of trees harvested and whole-ecosystem carbon flux is still unclear. In a large, replicated trial in western Canada, we monitored carbon in the ecosystem and wood products in response to logging of varying intensity: clearcuts, light and heavy partial-cuts, and no harvest. Averaged over the 26 years, net-CO2e yr−1 emissions increased linearly with logging intensity (R2=0.80 for mature stands). Unharvested stands were sinks (2.2 ± 1.9 MgCO2e ha−1 yr−1; mean ± standard deviation) and clearcuts were sources (-21 ± 11 MgCO2e ha−1 yr−1), whereas light partial-cuts almost recovered their pre-harvest carbon (-2.9 ± 2.7 MgCO2e ha−1 yr−1). An economic exercise suggests that partially or fully retaining mature trees in interior temperate rainforests can help meet 2050 ‘net-zero’ targets while still providing economic benefits greater than logging if emissions are priced above ∼CAD65 $ MgCO2e−1.
温带内陆雨林作为全球碳汇的角色与丰厚的伐木收入相冲突。然而,树木采伐比例与整个生态系统碳通量之间的关系尚不清楚。在加拿大西部进行的一项大型重复试验中,我们监测了生态系统和木材产品中的碳含量,以应对不同强度的伐木:完全砍伐,轻度和重度部分砍伐,以及没有收获。平均26年,净co2e年- 1排放量随采伐强度线性增加(成熟林分R2=0.80)。未采伐的林分是汇(2.2 ± 1.9 MgCO2e ha - 1 yr - 1;平均值±标准差),而未采伐的林分是源(-21 ± 11 MgCO2e ha - 1 yr - 1),而轻度部分采伐几乎恢复了采伐前的碳(-2.9 ± 2.7 MgCO2e ha - 1 yr - 1)。一项经济研究表明,在温带内陆雨林中部分或全部保留成熟树木有助于实现2050年的“净零”目标,同时如果排放定价高于65加元/立方米二氧化碳当量- 1,则仍能提供比伐木更大的经济效益。
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.