Dearth under earth: Understudied plant-soil-fire feedback as drivers of forest mesophication and oak regeneration failures

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Eva O.L. Legge , Akihiro Koyama , Christopher W. Fernandez , Katherine E.A. Wood , Narda J. Triviño Silva , Lars A. Brudvig , Andrew L. Vander Yacht
{"title":"Dearth under earth: Understudied plant-soil-fire feedback as drivers of forest mesophication and oak regeneration failures","authors":"Eva O.L. Legge ,&nbsp;Akihiro Koyama ,&nbsp;Christopher W. Fernandez ,&nbsp;Katherine E.A. Wood ,&nbsp;Narda J. Triviño Silva ,&nbsp;Lars A. Brudvig ,&nbsp;Andrew L. Vander Yacht","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regeneration of drought-tolerant and fire-adapted (pyrophytic) trees like oaks (<em>Quercus</em> spp.) is broadly limited by mesophication – a positive feedback where darker, wetter, and cooler microsites promoted by fire suppression favor drought-intolerant and fire-sensitive (pyrophobic) trees like maples (<em>Acer</em> spp<em>.</em>). Given projected increases in fire and drought, mesophication could reduce forest resilience to future stressors. Although the issue is widely recognized, corrective management has almost exclusively focused on aboveground drivers (<em>i.e.</em>, fire suppression effects on fuel and microclimatic properties). We propose a complex feedback framework involving mature and immature trees, fire, and abiotic and biotic soil properties (<em>i.e.</em>, “plant-soil-fire feedback”) that may provide a more complete understanding of mesophication. Focusing on the eastern US, we: 1) review the current mechanistic understanding of mesophication, 2) identify overlooked belowground drivers (<em>i.e.</em>, plant-soil-fire feedback), 3) explore future research needs, and 4) derive forest management implications. We argue that fire suppression directly and indirectly increases soil moisture and nutrient availability and alters soil microbial communities in ways that favor pyrophobic tree species. Such trees then outcompete pyrophytic trees by further promoting such belowground conditions that reinforce their dominance and further exclude fire. We conclude that mesophication cannot be fully understood – or reversed – without considering plant-soil-fire feedback. Such perspective can inform forest management that ensures resilience by promoting drought-tolerant and pyrophytic trees like oaks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regeneration of drought-tolerant and fire-adapted (pyrophytic) trees like oaks (Quercus spp.) is broadly limited by mesophication – a positive feedback where darker, wetter, and cooler microsites promoted by fire suppression favor drought-intolerant and fire-sensitive (pyrophobic) trees like maples (Acer spp.). Given projected increases in fire and drought, mesophication could reduce forest resilience to future stressors. Although the issue is widely recognized, corrective management has almost exclusively focused on aboveground drivers (i.e., fire suppression effects on fuel and microclimatic properties). We propose a complex feedback framework involving mature and immature trees, fire, and abiotic and biotic soil properties (i.e., “plant-soil-fire feedback”) that may provide a more complete understanding of mesophication. Focusing on the eastern US, we: 1) review the current mechanistic understanding of mesophication, 2) identify overlooked belowground drivers (i.e., plant-soil-fire feedback), 3) explore future research needs, and 4) derive forest management implications. We argue that fire suppression directly and indirectly increases soil moisture and nutrient availability and alters soil microbial communities in ways that favor pyrophobic tree species. Such trees then outcompete pyrophytic trees by further promoting such belowground conditions that reinforce their dominance and further exclude fire. We conclude that mesophication cannot be fully understood – or reversed – without considering plant-soil-fire feedback. Such perspective can inform forest management that ensures resilience by promoting drought-tolerant and pyrophytic trees like oaks.
地下土壤:未充分研究的植物-土壤-火反馈作为森林中间发育和橡树再生失败的驱动因素
耐旱和耐火(热植)树木如橡树(栎属)的再生广泛受到中植作用的限制——这是一种正反馈,在这种正反馈中,由灭火促进的较暗、较湿和较冷的微环境有利于耐旱和耐火(恐火)树木,如枫树(槭属)。考虑到预计的火灾和干旱的增加,间植过程可能会降低森林对未来压力源的适应能力。虽然这个问题已得到广泛认可,但纠正管理几乎只关注地面驱动因素(即对燃料和微气候特性的灭火影响)。我们提出了一个复杂的反馈框架,包括成熟和未成熟的树木、火、非生物和生物土壤特性(即“植物-土壤-火反馈”),这可能提供对中植过程更完整的理解。以美国东部为研究对象,我们:1)回顾了目前对中叶化机制的理解,2)确定了被忽视的地下驱动因素(即植物-土壤-火反馈),3)探索未来的研究需求,4)得出森林管理的启示。我们认为,灭火直接或间接地增加了土壤水分和养分有效性,并以有利于疏火树种的方式改变了土壤微生物群落。这些树木通过进一步促进地下环境来加强它们的优势地位,并进一步排除火灾,从而与热生树木竞争。我们的结论是,如果不考虑植物-土壤-火的反馈,中间化不能被完全理解或逆转。这种观点可以为森林管理提供信息,通过促进橡树等耐旱和热植树木来确保恢复力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信