Ana Claudia Gama Batista , Isabela Maria Souza Silva , Maria Gabriella da Silva Araújo , Deoclecio Jardim Amorim , Gabriela Bielefeld Nardoto , Fábio José Viana Costa , Niro Higuchi , Mario Tomazello-Filho , Ana Carolina Barbosa , Vladmir Eliodoro Costa , Stéphane Ponton , Luiz Antonio Martinelli
{"title":"Within- and between-site variability of δ18O, δ13C, and δ15N in Amazonian tree rings: Climatic drivers and implications for geographic traceability","authors":"Ana Claudia Gama Batista , Isabela Maria Souza Silva , Maria Gabriella da Silva Araújo , Deoclecio Jardim Amorim , Gabriela Bielefeld Nardoto , Fábio José Viana Costa , Niro Higuchi , Mario Tomazello-Filho , Ana Carolina Barbosa , Vladmir Eliodoro Costa , Stéphane Ponton , Luiz Antonio Martinelli","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Illegal logging in the Amazon rainforest remains a major environmental challenge, contributing to widespread forest degradation and undermining global conservation efforts. Among emerging forensic tools for combating illegal timber trade, stable isotope analysis has shown promise for tracing the geographic origin of wood. In this study, we assess the spatial variability and environmental controls of δ<sup>18</sup>O, δ<sup>13</sup>C, and δ<sup>15</sup>N in tree-ring cellulose across 249 trees sampled at 21 sites in the Brazilian Amazon. We analyze intra-tree isotopic variation using wood samples from five radial positions per tree and evaluate variance components using Bayesian mixed-effects models. Our results reveal that isotopic variation across radial positions is relatively small compared to within- and between-site variability, with radius 4 (near the sapwood-heartwood boundary) providing a representative and forensically practical sampling location. Variance partitioning shows that between-site differences account for the largest share of isotopic variation, although within-site variability—driven by species identity and microclimatic factors—remains substantial, especially for δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>13</sup>C. Power curve analyses suggest that sampling approximately 10 individuals per site suffices for δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>15</sup>N, while δ<sup>18</sup>O requires more extensive sampling. Random forest models incorporating climatic, topographic, and physiological predictors explained up to 73 % of the variance in δ<sup>15</sup>N but were less effective for δ<sup>18</sup>O and δ<sup>13</sup>C. These findings provide critical insights for designing stable isotope-based timber traceability systems, highlighting the need for robust sampling strategies and the inclusion of species-specific traits to enhance model performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Illegal logging in the Amazon rainforest remains a major environmental challenge, contributing to widespread forest degradation and undermining global conservation efforts. Among emerging forensic tools for combating illegal timber trade, stable isotope analysis has shown promise for tracing the geographic origin of wood. In this study, we assess the spatial variability and environmental controls of δ18O, δ13C, and δ15N in tree-ring cellulose across 249 trees sampled at 21 sites in the Brazilian Amazon. We analyze intra-tree isotopic variation using wood samples from five radial positions per tree and evaluate variance components using Bayesian mixed-effects models. Our results reveal that isotopic variation across radial positions is relatively small compared to within- and between-site variability, with radius 4 (near the sapwood-heartwood boundary) providing a representative and forensically practical sampling location. Variance partitioning shows that between-site differences account for the largest share of isotopic variation, although within-site variability—driven by species identity and microclimatic factors—remains substantial, especially for δ18O and δ13C. Power curve analyses suggest that sampling approximately 10 individuals per site suffices for δ13C and δ15N, while δ18O requires more extensive sampling. Random forest models incorporating climatic, topographic, and physiological predictors explained up to 73 % of the variance in δ15N but were less effective for δ18O and δ13C. These findings provide critical insights for designing stable isotope-based timber traceability systems, highlighting the need for robust sampling strategies and the inclusion of species-specific traits to enhance model performance.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.