Influence of process parameters on the exergy analysis of biomass fluidized bed gasification

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Jun Guo , Xianan Xiang , Sha Liu , Wenni Chen , Tao Li , Hong Wang , Jianzhong Bian , Jiajun Feng , Linming Xia , Guoqiang Lu , Shenke Shi , Chunhui He
{"title":"Influence of process parameters on the exergy analysis of biomass fluidized bed gasification","authors":"Jun Guo ,&nbsp;Xianan Xiang ,&nbsp;Sha Liu ,&nbsp;Wenni Chen ,&nbsp;Tao Li ,&nbsp;Hong Wang ,&nbsp;Jianzhong Bian ,&nbsp;Jiajun Feng ,&nbsp;Linming Xia ,&nbsp;Guoqiang Lu ,&nbsp;Shenke Shi ,&nbsp;Chunhui He","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomass gasification technology, as an efficient renewable energy solution, has garnered widespread attention. This study uses experimental data and exergy analysis to comprehensively investigate the impact of key process parameters such as temperature, Equivalence Ratio (ER), Steam to Carbon ratio (S/C), bed pressure, agents, catalysts, and raw material characteristics on the efficiency of biomass fluidized bed gasification. The findings suggest that higher temperatures significantly enhance the exergy and production rates of gas by improving thermodynamic and kinetic conditions. An optimal ER is identified, which balances heat release and minimizes syngas dilution, with benefits diminishing beyond this optimal range. Variations in the S/C ratio initially increase but subsequently reduce both the gas production rate and exergy efficiency. The introduction of pure oxygen notably enhances the system's efficiency. Additionally, the results indicate that optimal bed pressure is essential for fostering effective gas-solid interactions, and even a small amount of catalyst can substantially improve exergy efficiency. Additionally, increasing elemental analysis carbon rather than fixed carbon has been proven to be more beneficial for gasification, while controlling moisture content and particle size is also important for optimizing gasification performance. This study provides a pathway for the development of more efficient and effective biomass gasification systems by focusing on optimizing these critical parameters.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116320"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125009931","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomass gasification technology, as an efficient renewable energy solution, has garnered widespread attention. This study uses experimental data and exergy analysis to comprehensively investigate the impact of key process parameters such as temperature, Equivalence Ratio (ER), Steam to Carbon ratio (S/C), bed pressure, agents, catalysts, and raw material characteristics on the efficiency of biomass fluidized bed gasification. The findings suggest that higher temperatures significantly enhance the exergy and production rates of gas by improving thermodynamic and kinetic conditions. An optimal ER is identified, which balances heat release and minimizes syngas dilution, with benefits diminishing beyond this optimal range. Variations in the S/C ratio initially increase but subsequently reduce both the gas production rate and exergy efficiency. The introduction of pure oxygen notably enhances the system's efficiency. Additionally, the results indicate that optimal bed pressure is essential for fostering effective gas-solid interactions, and even a small amount of catalyst can substantially improve exergy efficiency. Additionally, increasing elemental analysis carbon rather than fixed carbon has been proven to be more beneficial for gasification, while controlling moisture content and particle size is also important for optimizing gasification performance. This study provides a pathway for the development of more efficient and effective biomass gasification systems by focusing on optimizing these critical parameters.
工艺参数对生物质流化床气化火用分析的影响
生物质气化技术作为一种高效的可再生能源解决方案,受到了广泛的关注。本研究通过实验数据和火用分析,综合考察了温度、等效比(ER)、汽碳比(S/C)、床压、药剂、催化剂、原料特性等关键工艺参数对生物质流化床气化效率的影响。研究结果表明,较高的温度通过改善热力学和动力学条件显著提高了天然气的火用和产量。确定了一个最佳ER,它可以平衡热量释放并最大限度地减少合成气稀释,其益处在此最佳范围内递减。S/C比值的变化最初会增加,但随后会降低产气量和火用效率。纯氧的引入显著提高了系统的效率。此外,研究结果表明,最佳床层压力对于促进有效的气固相互作用至关重要,即使少量的催化剂也可以显著提高火用效率。此外,增加元素分析碳而不是固定碳已被证明更有利于气化,而控制水分含量和粒度对优化气化性能也很重要。本研究通过重点优化这些关键参数,为开发更高效和有效的生物质气化系统提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信