Influence of esophageal temperature probe tip placement on core temperature measurement accuracy in cold environments: a randomized crossover trial with implications for cardiac arrest management

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Giulia Roveri , Tomas Dal Cappello , Alex Hofer , Franziska Breidt , Othmar Kofler , Erik Popp , Hermann Brugger , Simon Rauch
{"title":"Influence of esophageal temperature probe tip placement on core temperature measurement accuracy in cold environments: a randomized crossover trial with implications for cardiac arrest management","authors":"Giulia Roveri ,&nbsp;Tomas Dal Cappello ,&nbsp;Alex Hofer ,&nbsp;Franziska Breidt ,&nbsp;Othmar Kofler ,&nbsp;Erik Popp ,&nbsp;Hermann Brugger ,&nbsp;Simon Rauch","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate core temperature (CT) measurement is critical for staging and management in accidental hypothermia, particularly in cardiac arrest, where it guides extracorporeal rewarming decisions. Esophageal temperature monitoring is considered the reference method in the prehospital setting in patients with a secured airway, provided the probe tip is positioned in the distal third of the esophagus behind the heart. However, the effect of proximal misplacement on measurement accuracy remains unknown. We hypothesized that a probe tip positioned behind the trachea would yield falsely low readings during cold air exposure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this randomized crossover study (May 2024 at Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy), healthy volunteers underwent nasal esophageal probe placement using a height-based formula. Two probe positions were defined via posteroanterior chest radiographs: correct (behind the heart) and incorrect (5 cm above the tracheal bifurcation). Participants were exposed to –20 °C for 20 min in a climate chamber, once with the probe in the correct and once in the incorrect position, in randomized order, separated by a washout period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen participants (7 male, 8 female) completed the study. Mean correct insertion depth was 41.1 (2.5) cm for males and 39.3 (1.5) cm for females. At baseline and throughout –20 °C exposure, mean CT was on average 0.6 °C lower when the probe was incorrectly positioned. Temperature fluctuations were also greater with proximal misplacement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Proximal misplacement of esophageal probes during cold air exposure results in falsely low and more variable CT readings. This may critically affect triage and treatment, particularly in hypothermic cardiac arrest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425002243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate core temperature (CT) measurement is critical for staging and management in accidental hypothermia, particularly in cardiac arrest, where it guides extracorporeal rewarming decisions. Esophageal temperature monitoring is considered the reference method in the prehospital setting in patients with a secured airway, provided the probe tip is positioned in the distal third of the esophagus behind the heart. However, the effect of proximal misplacement on measurement accuracy remains unknown. We hypothesized that a probe tip positioned behind the trachea would yield falsely low readings during cold air exposure.

Methods

In this randomized crossover study (May 2024 at Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy), healthy volunteers underwent nasal esophageal probe placement using a height-based formula. Two probe positions were defined via posteroanterior chest radiographs: correct (behind the heart) and incorrect (5 cm above the tracheal bifurcation). Participants were exposed to –20 °C for 20 min in a climate chamber, once with the probe in the correct and once in the incorrect position, in randomized order, separated by a washout period.

Results

Fifteen participants (7 male, 8 female) completed the study. Mean correct insertion depth was 41.1 (2.5) cm for males and 39.3 (1.5) cm for females. At baseline and throughout –20 °C exposure, mean CT was on average 0.6 °C lower when the probe was incorrectly positioned. Temperature fluctuations were also greater with proximal misplacement.

Conclusion

Proximal misplacement of esophageal probes during cold air exposure results in falsely low and more variable CT readings. This may critically affect triage and treatment, particularly in hypothermic cardiac arrest.
在寒冷环境中,食道温度探头尖端位置对核心温度测量精度的影响:一项具有心脏骤停管理意义的随机交叉试验
准确的核心温度(CT)测量对于意外体温过低的分期和管理至关重要,特别是在心脏骤停时,它指导体外复温决策。如果探头尖端位于心脏后方食道远端三分之一处,那么对于有固定气道的患者,食道温度监测被认为是院前设置的参考方法。然而,近端错位对测量精度的影响尚不清楚。我们假设放置在气管后面的探针尖端会在冷空气暴露时产生错误的低读数。方法在这项随机交叉研究(2024年5月在意大利博尔扎诺的Eurac Research进行)中,健康志愿者使用基于身高的公式进行鼻腔食管探头放置。通过胸片后前方确定两个探头位置:正确位置(心脏后方)和错误位置(气管分叉上方5cm)。参与者在-20°C的气候室中暴露20分钟,一次将探针置于正确位置,一次置于错误位置,按随机顺序,间隔一段冲洗期。结果15名参与者(男7名,女8名)完成了研究。男性的平均正确插入深度为41.1 (2.5)cm,女性为39.3 (1.5)cm。在基线和整个-20°C暴露期间,当探头位置不正确时,平均CT平均降低0.6°C。近端错位的温度波动也更大。结论低温暴露时近端食道探头错位导致CT读数虚低且变化较大。这可能严重影响分诊和治疗,特别是在低温心脏骤停时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信