Say it again, you'll be faster: Or on how the language production system keeps track of co-occurrences

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Audrey Bürki , Julia Pantelmann , Hyien Jeong , Filip Nenadić
{"title":"Say it again, you'll be faster: Or on how the language production system keeps track of co-occurrences","authors":"Audrey Bürki ,&nbsp;Julia Pantelmann ,&nbsp;Hyien Jeong ,&nbsp;Filip Nenadić","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The linguistic system allows for an almost infinite number of combinations, but speakers tend to use some word combinations more often than others. It would be intuitive to assume that these probabilities are registered and used to make the selection of upcoming words easier. The present study was designed to test this assumption. Participants named pictures using an adjective and a noun before and after a series of picture naming training sessions. During training, half of the presented pictures remained the same, while the other half were altered to maintain the same number of adjective and noun occurrences in novel combinations. The decrease in naming latencies after training is about 40 ms larger for repeated phrases. Experiment 2 replicates these results and shows that they are still observed after a day without additional exposure. Experiment 3 shows that these effects cannot be reduced to mere picture exposure. These findings challenge important assumptions of dominant psycholinguistic models. They suggest that the language production system registers direct word co-occurrences and stores the information for some time. We discuss an account of these effects in which connection strength between word representations are based on direct co-occurrence. Notably, these results open the way for detailed investigations and modeling of the mechanisms that drive probabilistic effects in language production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"266 ","pages":"Article 106316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The linguistic system allows for an almost infinite number of combinations, but speakers tend to use some word combinations more often than others. It would be intuitive to assume that these probabilities are registered and used to make the selection of upcoming words easier. The present study was designed to test this assumption. Participants named pictures using an adjective and a noun before and after a series of picture naming training sessions. During training, half of the presented pictures remained the same, while the other half were altered to maintain the same number of adjective and noun occurrences in novel combinations. The decrease in naming latencies after training is about 40 ms larger for repeated phrases. Experiment 2 replicates these results and shows that they are still observed after a day without additional exposure. Experiment 3 shows that these effects cannot be reduced to mere picture exposure. These findings challenge important assumptions of dominant psycholinguistic models. They suggest that the language production system registers direct word co-occurrences and stores the information for some time. We discuss an account of these effects in which connection strength between word representations are based on direct co-occurrence. Notably, these results open the way for detailed investigations and modeling of the mechanisms that drive probabilistic effects in language production.
再说一遍,你会更快:或者语言产生系统如何跟踪共现现象
语言系统允许几乎无限的组合,但说话者倾向于使用一些词的组合比其他更多。我们可以直观地认为,这些概率被注册并用于更容易地选择即将出现的单词。本研究旨在验证这一假设。参与者在一系列图片命名训练之前和之后使用形容词和名词来命名图片。在训练过程中,一半呈现的图片保持不变,而另一半则以新的组合方式保持相同数量的形容词和名词的出现。重复短语训练后的命名延迟减少约40毫秒。实验2重复了这些结果,并表明在没有额外暴露的情况下,它们在一天后仍然可以观察到。实验3表明,这些影响不能仅仅通过图片曝光来降低。这些发现挑战了主流心理语言学模型的重要假设。他们认为,语言产生系统直接记录单词共现现象,并将这些信息存储一段时间。我们讨论了这些影响的一个帐户,其中单词表征之间的连接强度是基于直接共现。值得注意的是,这些结果为语言产生中驱动概率效应的机制的详细调查和建模开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信