Response of liquefiable sloping site to mainshock-aftershock ground motions

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Junyan Han , Jiaxue Wang , Liyun Li , M. Hesham El Naggar , Chengshun Xu , Xiuli Du
{"title":"Response of liquefiable sloping site to mainshock-aftershock ground motions","authors":"Junyan Han ,&nbsp;Jiaxue Wang ,&nbsp;Liyun Li ,&nbsp;M. Hesham El Naggar ,&nbsp;Chengshun Xu ,&nbsp;Xiuli Du","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aftershocks following a major earthquake can induce substantial cumulative damage in liquefiable soils, thereby posing considerable risks to critical infrastructure systems. To explore the re-liquefaction behavior and site deformation patterns of sloping sites under the combined effects of the mainshock and aftershocks, liquefiable sloping site models are established using PDMY and PIMY constitutive models to simulate the nonlinear behavior of sandy and clayey soils. Soil responses to mainshock-aftershock ground motion sequences with varying intensity ratios are analyzed and compared in terms of excess pore pressure ratio (EPPR), acceleration, residual displacement, and shear stress-strain hysteresis. The results indicate that mainshock-aftershock ground motions cause more severe liquefaction in the sand deposit than the mainshock alone, leading to greater lateral spreading of the soil. The aftershock-mainshock intensity ratio governs the degree of liquefaction and soil lateral spreading; it increases the degree of liquefaction in non-liquefied soils, while previously liquefied soils re-liquefy after initial liquefaction. However, it has a slight influence on the rise in pore water pressure. As the aftershock-mainshock intensity ratio increases from 0.5 to 2.0, the maximum attenuation of the acceleration peak in liquefied soil reaches 325.53 % and the horizontal displacement increases by 278.72 %. Similarly, the settlement at the slope crest and the uplift at the slope toe are amplified to 5.07 and 5.18 times the values from the mainshock, respectively. The shear strain of the soil demonstrates clear shear slip characteristics, indicating that the aftershock significantly enhances the shear response of liquefied soil, which further promotes the development and accumulation of deformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 109809"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125006037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aftershocks following a major earthquake can induce substantial cumulative damage in liquefiable soils, thereby posing considerable risks to critical infrastructure systems. To explore the re-liquefaction behavior and site deformation patterns of sloping sites under the combined effects of the mainshock and aftershocks, liquefiable sloping site models are established using PDMY and PIMY constitutive models to simulate the nonlinear behavior of sandy and clayey soils. Soil responses to mainshock-aftershock ground motion sequences with varying intensity ratios are analyzed and compared in terms of excess pore pressure ratio (EPPR), acceleration, residual displacement, and shear stress-strain hysteresis. The results indicate that mainshock-aftershock ground motions cause more severe liquefaction in the sand deposit than the mainshock alone, leading to greater lateral spreading of the soil. The aftershock-mainshock intensity ratio governs the degree of liquefaction and soil lateral spreading; it increases the degree of liquefaction in non-liquefied soils, while previously liquefied soils re-liquefy after initial liquefaction. However, it has a slight influence on the rise in pore water pressure. As the aftershock-mainshock intensity ratio increases from 0.5 to 2.0, the maximum attenuation of the acceleration peak in liquefied soil reaches 325.53 % and the horizontal displacement increases by 278.72 %. Similarly, the settlement at the slope crest and the uplift at the slope toe are amplified to 5.07 and 5.18 times the values from the mainshock, respectively. The shear strain of the soil demonstrates clear shear slip characteristics, indicating that the aftershock significantly enhances the shear response of liquefied soil, which further promotes the development and accumulation of deformation.
可液化斜坡场地对主余震地震动的响应
大地震后的余震会对可液化土壤造成严重的累积破坏,从而对关键基础设施系统构成相当大的风险。为了探讨主震和余震共同作用下斜坡场地的再液化行为和场地变形模式,采用PDMY和PIMY本构模型建立了可液化斜坡场地模型,模拟了砂质和粘性土的非线性行为。从超孔隙压比(EPPR)、加速度、残余位移和剪应力-应变滞后等方面分析和比较了不同强度比下主余震地震动序列下土体的响应。结果表明,主震-余震地震动对砂土的液化作用比主震单独作用更严重,导致土体横向扩展更大。余震-主震烈度比决定了液化程度和土体横向扩展;它增加了未液化土壤的液化程度,而先前液化的土壤在初始液化后再液化。但对孔隙水压力的升高影响较小。当余震-主震烈度比从0.5增加到2.0时,液化土中加速度峰的最大衰减量达到325.53%,水平位移增加278.72%。坡顶沉降和坡脚隆升分别放大到主震的5.07倍和5.18倍。土体剪切应变表现出明显的剪切滑移特征,表明余震显著增强了液化土体的剪切响应,进一步促进了变形的发展和积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信