Biochemical biomarkers of knee osteoarthritis progression: Results from the FNIH biomarkers consortium progress OA study

IF 2.8
Jamie E. Collins , Douglas Robinson , Nigel Arden , Anne Christine Bay-Jensen , Leticia A. Deveza , Morten Karsdal , Christoph Ladel , Thomas A. Perry , Christopher J. Swearingen , David J. Hunter , Virginia B. Kraus
{"title":"Biochemical biomarkers of knee osteoarthritis progression: Results from the FNIH biomarkers consortium progress OA study","authors":"Jamie E. Collins ,&nbsp;Douglas Robinson ,&nbsp;Nigel Arden ,&nbsp;Anne Christine Bay-Jensen ,&nbsp;Leticia A. Deveza ,&nbsp;Morten Karsdal ,&nbsp;Christoph Ladel ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Perry ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Swearingen ,&nbsp;David J. Hunter ,&nbsp;Virginia B. Kraus","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Foundation for National Institutes of Health (FNIH) OA Biomarkers Consortium aims to identify and qualify biomarkers to support drug development in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The PROGRESS OA study aims to externally validate prognostic biomarkers identified in the earlier Phase I study.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>PROGRESS OA included data from the control arms of several completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for knee OA. The primary outcome was medial or lateral joint space width loss (JSWL) ≥0.7 ​mm. Secondary outcomes included medial or lateral JSWL combined with symptomatic progression. Nine biochemical biomarkers identified in Phase I were included here. Logistic regression with elastic net selection examined associations between baseline biomarkers and outcomes over 12–36 months, separately for subgroups with available serum, urine, and both serum and urine biomarkers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, the study included 827 participants across three RCTs, 159 (19 ​%) with JSWL≥0.7 ​mm. In 681 participants with both serum and urine biospecimens, the combination of serum hyaluronan (HA), urinary C2C-HUSA, body mass index (BMI), and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) yielded AUC 0.627 (95 ​% CI: 0.573, 0.681) for predicting JSWL≥0.7 ​mm, compared to AUC 0.612 (95 ​% CI: 0.557, 0.667) for BMI and KLG alone. Serum (HA) and urinary C2C-HUSA were consistently selected as predictors of disease progression in elastic net models across the subgroups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Biomarker associations were consistent with Phase I findings, but predictive performance remained modest. Future work in the FNIH OA Biomarkers consortium project will focus on evaluating short term changes in biomarkers to assess their potential for monitoring treatment efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100677"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312500113X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The Foundation for National Institutes of Health (FNIH) OA Biomarkers Consortium aims to identify and qualify biomarkers to support drug development in knee osteoarthritis (OA). The PROGRESS OA study aims to externally validate prognostic biomarkers identified in the earlier Phase I study.

Design

PROGRESS OA included data from the control arms of several completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for knee OA. The primary outcome was medial or lateral joint space width loss (JSWL) ≥0.7 ​mm. Secondary outcomes included medial or lateral JSWL combined with symptomatic progression. Nine biochemical biomarkers identified in Phase I were included here. Logistic regression with elastic net selection examined associations between baseline biomarkers and outcomes over 12–36 months, separately for subgroups with available serum, urine, and both serum and urine biomarkers.

Results

In total, the study included 827 participants across three RCTs, 159 (19 ​%) with JSWL≥0.7 ​mm. In 681 participants with both serum and urine biospecimens, the combination of serum hyaluronan (HA), urinary C2C-HUSA, body mass index (BMI), and Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) yielded AUC 0.627 (95 ​% CI: 0.573, 0.681) for predicting JSWL≥0.7 ​mm, compared to AUC 0.612 (95 ​% CI: 0.557, 0.667) for BMI and KLG alone. Serum (HA) and urinary C2C-HUSA were consistently selected as predictors of disease progression in elastic net models across the subgroups.

Conclusions

Biomarker associations were consistent with Phase I findings, but predictive performance remained modest. Future work in the FNIH OA Biomarkers consortium project will focus on evaluating short term changes in biomarkers to assess their potential for monitoring treatment efficacy.
膝关节骨关节炎进展的生化生物标志物:来自FNIH生物标志物联盟进展OA研究的结果
美国国立卫生研究院(FNIH) OA生物标志物联盟基金会旨在鉴定和鉴定生物标志物,以支持膝关节骨关节炎(OA)的药物开发。PROGRESS OA研究旨在外部验证早期I期研究中确定的预后生物标志物。DesignPROGRESS OA纳入了几个已完成的膝关节OA随机对照试验(rct)的对照组数据。主要终点为内侧或外侧关节间隙宽度损失(JSWL)≥0.7 mm。次要结局包括内侧或外侧JSWL合并症状进展。在I期鉴定的9个生化生物标志物包括在这里。使用弹性网选择的Logistic回归检查了基线生物标志物与12-36个月预后之间的关系,分别用于血清、尿液和血清和尿液生物标志物可用的亚组。结果本研究共纳入3个rct的827名受试者,其中159名(19%)JSWL≥0.7 mm。在681名具有血清和尿液生物标本的参与者中,血清透明质酸(HA)、尿C2C-HUSA、体重指数(BMI)和kell格林-劳伦斯分级(KLG)联合预测JSWL≥0.7 mm的AUC为0.627 (95% CI: 0.573, 0.681),而BMI和KLG单独预测JSWL≥0.7 mm的AUC为0.612 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.667)。在弹性网模型中,血清(HA)和尿C2C-HUSA被一致选择作为疾病进展的预测因子。结论:生物标志物相关性与I期研究结果一致,但预测性能仍然不高。FNIH OA生物标志物联盟项目的未来工作将侧重于评估生物标志物的短期变化,以评估其监测治疗疗效的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信