Defining and measuring varus thrust in knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review of current evidence and challenges

IF 2.8
Vincenzo E. Di Bacco , Zaryan Masood , Joshua A.J. Keogh , Matthew C. Ruder , Fatima Gafoor , Jenny Wu , Yalda Azari , Eseoghene Orogun , Dylan Kobsar
{"title":"Defining and measuring varus thrust in knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review of current evidence and challenges","authors":"Vincenzo E. Di Bacco ,&nbsp;Zaryan Masood ,&nbsp;Joshua A.J. Keogh ,&nbsp;Matthew C. Ruder ,&nbsp;Fatima Gafoor ,&nbsp;Jenny Wu ,&nbsp;Yalda Azari ,&nbsp;Eseoghene Orogun ,&nbsp;Dylan Kobsar","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This scoping review investigated the definitions, assessment methods, and current applications of varus thrust (VT) in knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched in this scoping review for studies assessing VT during walking in adults with knee OA using the terms “varus” and “lateral” in proximity to thrust. Data were extracted and categorized by study characteristics (OA sample, publication year, design, and aim) and VT assessment protocol (method and definition).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 63 studies were included, examining 12,569 individuals with knee OA using visual (<em>n</em> ​= ​24), optical motion capture (<em>n</em> ​= ​27), or inertial/wearable sensor (<em>n</em> ​= ​19) methods. Designs included prospective, experimental, cross-sectional, and case series. VT was most often assessed to examine disease severity, progression, surgical outcomes, and symptom associations. Visual VT was commonly defined as dynamic worsening or abrupt onset of varus alignment during weight acceptance. Optical motion capture commonly measured VT as frontal plane knee excursion from foot contact to mid-stance, while inertial methods typically used peak lateral tibial acceleration or angular velocity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite growing research interest in VT, inconsistent definitions and measurement protocols limit comparability across studies and hinder broader adoption. Greater standardization and validation are needed to clarify its potential clinical utility in knee OA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 4","pages":"Article 100683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125001190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This scoping review investigated the definitions, assessment methods, and current applications of varus thrust (VT) in knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched in this scoping review for studies assessing VT during walking in adults with knee OA using the terms “varus” and “lateral” in proximity to thrust. Data were extracted and categorized by study characteristics (OA sample, publication year, design, and aim) and VT assessment protocol (method and definition).

Results

A total of 63 studies were included, examining 12,569 individuals with knee OA using visual (n ​= ​24), optical motion capture (n ​= ​27), or inertial/wearable sensor (n ​= ​19) methods. Designs included prospective, experimental, cross-sectional, and case series. VT was most often assessed to examine disease severity, progression, surgical outcomes, and symptom associations. Visual VT was commonly defined as dynamic worsening or abrupt onset of varus alignment during weight acceptance. Optical motion capture commonly measured VT as frontal plane knee excursion from foot contact to mid-stance, while inertial methods typically used peak lateral tibial acceleration or angular velocity.

Conclusion

Despite growing research interest in VT, inconsistent definitions and measurement protocols limit comparability across studies and hinder broader adoption. Greater standardization and validation are needed to clarify its potential clinical utility in knee OA.
定义和测量膝骨关节炎的内翻推力:对当前证据和挑战的范围审查
目的探讨膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)内翻(VT)的定义、评估方法和目前的应用。方法在本综述中检索了5个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science Core Collection),以评估成人膝关节OA患者行走过程中使用“内翻”和“侧翻”这两个术语进行VT评估的研究。根据研究特征(OA样本、出版年份、设计和目的)和VT评估方案(方法和定义)对数据进行提取和分类。结果共纳入63项研究,采用视觉(n = 24)、光学运动捕捉(n = 27)或惯性/可穿戴传感器(n = 19)方法检查了12569例膝关节OA患者。设计包括前瞻性、实验性、横断面和病例系列。VT最常用于检查疾病严重程度、进展、手术结果和症状相关性。视觉VT通常定义为体重接受期间内翻对准的动态恶化或突然发作。光学运动捕捉通常测量的VT是膝关节从足部接触到中位的前平面偏移,而惯性方法通常使用峰值胫骨外侧加速度或角速度。尽管对VT的研究兴趣日益浓厚,但不一致的定义和测量方案限制了研究之间的可比性,并阻碍了更广泛的采用。需要更大的标准化和验证来阐明其在膝关节OA中的潜在临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信