Great power rivalry in energy politics scholarship: A bibliometric and thematic analysis

Kawsar Uddin Mahmud, Mohammad Tanzimuddin Khan
{"title":"Great power rivalry in energy politics scholarship: A bibliometric and thematic analysis","authors":"Kawsar Uddin Mahmud,&nbsp;Mohammad Tanzimuddin Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study of “energy politics” is considered one of the rapidly growing subfields of International Relations (IR) and International Political Economy (IPE). The convergence of state policies and geopolitical factors has consistently shaped the domain. “Energy”, as a unitary influencing factor, has long been at the heart of geopolitical strategy, as seen in the 1973 oil embargo and continuing disputes about acquiring natural gas by the great powers such as the US, Russia, and China. Now, with the international push for sustainability, countries are competing not only for fossil fuel reserves but also for domination in renewable technologies. Given the dynamics, this research explores the field’s paradigmatic evolution of the study area of “energy politics”, focusing on “political and geopolitical dynamics” that influenced the intellectual evolution of the scholarship. Applying a mixed-method approach (bibliometric quantitative analysis and thematic qualitative analysis), the findings of the bibliometric study—which analyzed 1567 peer-reviewed articles published from 2001 to 2024—yielded not only a comprehensive perspective on the evolution of energy politics research but also key insights into the future development in this area. Further thematic discussion also shows the great power rivalry between the US and China in this knowledge production arena. This paper concludes with the central argument that even beyond the great power competition in the economy and military realms between the two powers, they also compete in the knowledge-production arena, like the energy sector, to generate discourses and knowledge in favor of their hegemony.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25001851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of “energy politics” is considered one of the rapidly growing subfields of International Relations (IR) and International Political Economy (IPE). The convergence of state policies and geopolitical factors has consistently shaped the domain. “Energy”, as a unitary influencing factor, has long been at the heart of geopolitical strategy, as seen in the 1973 oil embargo and continuing disputes about acquiring natural gas by the great powers such as the US, Russia, and China. Now, with the international push for sustainability, countries are competing not only for fossil fuel reserves but also for domination in renewable technologies. Given the dynamics, this research explores the field’s paradigmatic evolution of the study area of “energy politics”, focusing on “political and geopolitical dynamics” that influenced the intellectual evolution of the scholarship. Applying a mixed-method approach (bibliometric quantitative analysis and thematic qualitative analysis), the findings of the bibliometric study—which analyzed 1567 peer-reviewed articles published from 2001 to 2024—yielded not only a comprehensive perspective on the evolution of energy politics research but also key insights into the future development in this area. Further thematic discussion also shows the great power rivalry between the US and China in this knowledge production arena. This paper concludes with the central argument that even beyond the great power competition in the economy and military realms between the two powers, they also compete in the knowledge-production arena, like the energy sector, to generate discourses and knowledge in favor of their hegemony.
能源政治研究中的大国竞争:文献计量与专题分析
“能源政治”的研究被认为是国际关系(IR)和国际政治经济学(IPE)快速发展的子领域之一。国家政策和地缘政治因素的融合始终塑造着这一领域。“能源”作为一个单一的影响因素,长期以来一直是地缘政治战略的核心,从1973年的石油禁运和美国、俄罗斯和中国等大国关于获取天然气的持续争端中就可以看出这一点。现在,随着国际社会对可持续发展的推动,各国不仅在争夺化石燃料储备,还在争夺可再生能源技术的主导地位。鉴于这种动态,本研究探索了“能源政治”研究领域的范式演变,重点关注影响学术知识演变的“政治和地缘政治动态”。采用混合方法(文献计量定量分析和专题定性分析),文献计量研究的结果——分析了2001年至2024年间发表的1567篇同行评议文章——不仅对能源政治研究的演变有了全面的看法,而且对该领域的未来发展也有了重要的见解。进一步的专题讨论也显示了美国和中国在知识生产领域的大国竞争。本文最后的中心论点是,除了两个大国在经济和军事领域的大国竞争之外,它们还在知识生产领域(如能源部门)竞争,以产生有利于其霸权的话语和知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信