ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A 20-YEAR NATIONAL DATABASE STUDY ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND INSIGHT INTO PREVENTION

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexander Hurtado MD, Walter Rossi MD, Reniell X. Iñiguez MD
{"title":"ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME AND INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: A 20-YEAR NATIONAL DATABASE STUDY ON CARDIOVASCULAR RISK AND INSIGHT INTO PREVENTION","authors":"Alexander Hurtado MD,&nbsp;Walter Rossi MD,&nbsp;Reniell X. Iñiguez MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This elevated risk is thought to stem from chronic systemic inflammation coupled with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite this recognized association, limited data exists on the impact of inflammation control and classic CVD preventive strategies in IBD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective analysis of a national database (TriNetX, LLC), accessed on February 19, 2025, encompassing electronic health records from 64 hospital systems and over 100 million patients across the United States between January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2025. Patients with IBD were compared to propensity-matched adult controls (matched for age, sex, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and overweight/obesity) using 1:1 greedy nearest neighbor matching. Primary analysis compared the prevalence, odds ratio, and Cox proportional hazards regression for ACS in patients with IBD compared to propensity-matched controls. Subset analyses examined comorbidities, cardiovascular medication use, and IBD-specific immunomodulatory therapies in IBD patients with and without ACS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 185,881 IBD patients and 7,873,639 propensity-matched controls, the unweighted ACS prevalence was 10.6% vs. 6.6% (OR 1.68, 95% CI [1.65-1.71], p&lt;0.001). The presence of IBD was independently associated with a greater risk of ACS over time (HR 1.33, 95% CI [1.311.35], p&lt;0.001). Subset analyses yielded 19,775 patients with IBD who had ACS and 166,106 patients with IBD who did not have ACS. Between these two groups, the use of common immunomodulators was associated with a lower risk of ACS (OR 0.16, 95% CI [0.15-0.17], p &lt;0.001). Traditional CVD risk factors remained prevalent among IBD patients, with no significant risk reduction observed with conventional cardiovascular medications; however, optimal dosing and degree of risk factor control could not be assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>From 2005 to 2025, ACS prevalence remained higher in IBD patients, mirroring prior studies. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between chronic systemic inflammation and classic CVD risk factors in driving ACS risk among IBD patients. While immunomodulatory therapy appears to be protective against CVD, comprehensive and aggressive strategies to manage traditional CVD risk factors remain essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101109"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725001849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic Area

ASCVD/CVD in Special Populations

Background

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This elevated risk is thought to stem from chronic systemic inflammation coupled with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite this recognized association, limited data exists on the impact of inflammation control and classic CVD preventive strategies in IBD.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of a national database (TriNetX, LLC), accessed on February 19, 2025, encompassing electronic health records from 64 hospital systems and over 100 million patients across the United States between January 1, 2005, and January 1, 2025. Patients with IBD were compared to propensity-matched adult controls (matched for age, sex, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and overweight/obesity) using 1:1 greedy nearest neighbor matching. Primary analysis compared the prevalence, odds ratio, and Cox proportional hazards regression for ACS in patients with IBD compared to propensity-matched controls. Subset analyses examined comorbidities, cardiovascular medication use, and IBD-specific immunomodulatory therapies in IBD patients with and without ACS.

Results

Among 185,881 IBD patients and 7,873,639 propensity-matched controls, the unweighted ACS prevalence was 10.6% vs. 6.6% (OR 1.68, 95% CI [1.65-1.71], p<0.001). The presence of IBD was independently associated with a greater risk of ACS over time (HR 1.33, 95% CI [1.311.35], p<0.001). Subset analyses yielded 19,775 patients with IBD who had ACS and 166,106 patients with IBD who did not have ACS. Between these two groups, the use of common immunomodulators was associated with a lower risk of ACS (OR 0.16, 95% CI [0.15-0.17], p <0.001). Traditional CVD risk factors remained prevalent among IBD patients, with no significant risk reduction observed with conventional cardiovascular medications; however, optimal dosing and degree of risk factor control could not be assessed.

Conclusions

From 2005 to 2025, ACS prevalence remained higher in IBD patients, mirroring prior studies. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between chronic systemic inflammation and classic CVD risk factors in driving ACS risk among IBD patients. While immunomodulatory therapy appears to be protective against CVD, comprehensive and aggressive strategies to manage traditional CVD risk factors remain essential.
急性冠状动脉综合征和炎症性肠病:一项关于心血管风险和预防的20年国家数据库研究
治疗领域ascvd /CVD在特殊人群中的应用背景炎症性肠病(IBD)患者发生急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的风险增加。这种升高的风险被认为源于慢性全身性炎症以及心血管疾病(CVD)的传统危险因素。尽管存在这种公认的关联,但关于炎症控制和经典CVD预防策略对IBD的影响的数据有限。方法我们对一个国家数据库(TriNetX, LLC)进行了回顾性分析,该数据库于2025年2月19日访问,包括2005年1月1日至2025年1月1日期间美国64家医院系统和1亿多名患者的电子健康记录。将IBD患者与倾向匹配的成人对照(年龄、性别、高血压、2型糖尿病、血脂异常、吸烟、酗酒和超重/肥胖)进行1:1贪婪最近邻匹配。初步分析比较了IBD患者与倾向匹配对照相比ACS的患病率、优势比和Cox比例风险回归。亚组分析检查了合并和不合并ACS的IBD患者的合并症、心血管药物使用和IBD特异性免疫调节治疗。结果在185,881例IBD患者和7,873,639例倾向匹配对照中,未加权ACS患病率为10.6%比6.6% (OR 1.68, 95% CI [1.65-1.71], p<0.001)。随着时间的推移,IBD的存在与ACS的风险增加独立相关(HR 1.33, 95% CI [1.311.35], p<0.001)。亚组分析结果显示,19775名IBD患者有ACS, 166106名IBD患者没有ACS。在这两组中,使用常见免疫调节剂与ACS的风险较低相关(OR 0.16, 95% CI [0.15-0.17], p <0.001)。传统的心血管疾病危险因素在IBD患者中仍然普遍存在,常规心血管药物没有显著降低风险;然而,最佳剂量和风险因素控制程度无法评估。结论从2005年到2025年,ACS在IBD患者中的患病率仍然较高,这与先前的研究相一致。我们的研究结果强调了慢性全身性炎症和典型CVD危险因素在IBD患者ACS风险驱动中的复杂相互作用。虽然免疫调节治疗似乎对CVD有保护作用,但综合和积极的策略来管理传统的CVD危险因素仍然是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信