Resilience framework for seaport infrastructure under extreme wind

A. Balbi , O. Kammouh , G.P. Cimellaro , M.P. Repetto
{"title":"Resilience framework for seaport infrastructure under extreme wind","authors":"A. Balbi ,&nbsp;O. Kammouh ,&nbsp;G.P. Cimellaro ,&nbsp;M.P. Repetto","doi":"10.1016/j.rcns.2025.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficient transportation of goods is vital for the economic growth of communities, making developing and maintaining seaport infrastructure an essential component of the marine transportation system. Given their geographic locations, ports are consistently at risk from natural hazards, making the resilience of port infrastructure an essential goal.</div><div>Despite considerable progress in resilience research, there remains a gap in methods tailored explicitly to assessing port resilience, particularly under extreme wind events. Current approaches often do not capture the full complexity of port systems, as they tend to focus on isolated aspects, such as structural resilience.</div><div>This paper introduces the PORT Resilience Framework, addressing these gaps by evaluating resilience through a comprehensive list of indicators gathered from various legitimate sources. The indicators are then organized under four comprehensive resilience dimensions: Physical Infrastructure, ICT (i.e., Information and Communication Technology) and Equipment; Organization and Business Management; Resources and Economic Development; and Territory, Environment, and Stakeholders. This classification is summarized under the acronym \"PORT.\"</div><div>This paper also introduces a method for aggregating resilience indicators by considering their performance before and after a specific hazard, transforming the data into a quantifiable Loss of Resilience index. The approach is applied to a case study, assessing the resilience of a real Terminal against wind action using real data sourced from the port management.</div><div>The case study analysis revealed that human resources and quay operations were the most critical factors affecting recovery, with insufficient staffing leading to prolonged recovery periods. The study further demonstrated that post-disruption activity surges, captured by different serviceability function methodologies, often created operational bottlenecks, challenging the port's overall recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101077,"journal":{"name":"Resilient Cities and Structures","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 99-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resilient Cities and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772741625000389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficient transportation of goods is vital for the economic growth of communities, making developing and maintaining seaport infrastructure an essential component of the marine transportation system. Given their geographic locations, ports are consistently at risk from natural hazards, making the resilience of port infrastructure an essential goal.
Despite considerable progress in resilience research, there remains a gap in methods tailored explicitly to assessing port resilience, particularly under extreme wind events. Current approaches often do not capture the full complexity of port systems, as they tend to focus on isolated aspects, such as structural resilience.
This paper introduces the PORT Resilience Framework, addressing these gaps by evaluating resilience through a comprehensive list of indicators gathered from various legitimate sources. The indicators are then organized under four comprehensive resilience dimensions: Physical Infrastructure, ICT (i.e., Information and Communication Technology) and Equipment; Organization and Business Management; Resources and Economic Development; and Territory, Environment, and Stakeholders. This classification is summarized under the acronym "PORT."
This paper also introduces a method for aggregating resilience indicators by considering their performance before and after a specific hazard, transforming the data into a quantifiable Loss of Resilience index. The approach is applied to a case study, assessing the resilience of a real Terminal against wind action using real data sourced from the port management.
The case study analysis revealed that human resources and quay operations were the most critical factors affecting recovery, with insufficient staffing leading to prolonged recovery periods. The study further demonstrated that post-disruption activity surges, captured by different serviceability function methodologies, often created operational bottlenecks, challenging the port's overall recovery.
港口基础设施在极端风条件下的弹性框架
货物的有效运输对社区的经济增长至关重要,使发展和维持海港基础设施成为海洋运输系统的重要组成部分。鉴于其地理位置,港口始终面临自然灾害的风险,因此港口基础设施的复原力是一个重要目标。尽管弹性研究取得了相当大的进展,但在明确评估港口弹性的方法上仍然存在差距,特别是在极端风事件下。目前的方法往往不能捕捉到港口系统的全部复杂性,因为它们往往侧重于孤立的方面,例如结构弹性。本文介绍了港口弹性框架,通过从各种合法来源收集的综合指标清单评估弹性,解决了这些差距。然后将指标按四个综合复原力维度进行组织:物理基础设施、ICT(即信息和通信技术)和设备;组织与企业管理;资源与经济发展;领土、环境和利益相关者。这种分类概括为首字母缩略词“PORT”。本文还介绍了一种综合考虑灾害发生前后弹性指标表现的方法,将数据转化为可量化的“弹性损失指数”。该方法被应用到一个案例研究中,使用来自港口管理的真实数据来评估一个真实码头对风力作用的恢复能力。案例分析显示,人力资源和码头操作是影响恢复的最关键因素,人手不足导致恢复周期延长。该研究进一步表明,通过不同的可服务性功能方法捕获的中断后活动激增通常会造成运营瓶颈,挑战港口的整体恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信