Systematic temperature error in RCARS diagnostics from improper Raman linewidths

IF 5.2 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jonas I. Hölzer , Henry Misoi , Thomas Seeger
{"title":"Systematic temperature error in RCARS diagnostics from improper Raman linewidths","authors":"Jonas I. Hölzer ,&nbsp;Henry Misoi ,&nbsp;Thomas Seeger","doi":"10.1016/j.proci.2025.105842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) stands as the standard for thermometry and major species detection and quantification in gas phase and combustion diagnostics. In recent years the database of empirical S-branch Raman linewidth for a variety of gases, gas mixtures and temperatures for rotational CARS spectroscopy has been significantly expanded. The Raman linewidths are of utmost importance for accurate extraction of thermodynamic information from the spectral information. However, unavailable correct linewidth data for rotational CARS evaluations are regularly substituted by approximated data for example by omission of the proper collisional environment or by using the vibrational Q-branch linewidth instead of the rotational S-branch linewidths. The resulting systematic errors by using incorrect linewidths have only been studied for a few selected cases which hint at a significant temperature error of up to 9 %. In this work we show a clear picture of the temperature and concentration errors resulting from incorrect linewidth data by evaluating the influence of S- vs. Q-branch linewidths in pure oxygen and self-broadening vs. accurate collisional environment in air and nitrogen-water vapor mixtures. The data show that the evaluated temperature is systematically too high by using Q-branch instead of S-branch linewidths in oxygen and nitrogen thermometry and a strong influence of the collisional environment on the temperature and species concentration determination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":408,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 105842"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Combustion Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1540748925000562","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) stands as the standard for thermometry and major species detection and quantification in gas phase and combustion diagnostics. In recent years the database of empirical S-branch Raman linewidth for a variety of gases, gas mixtures and temperatures for rotational CARS spectroscopy has been significantly expanded. The Raman linewidths are of utmost importance for accurate extraction of thermodynamic information from the spectral information. However, unavailable correct linewidth data for rotational CARS evaluations are regularly substituted by approximated data for example by omission of the proper collisional environment or by using the vibrational Q-branch linewidth instead of the rotational S-branch linewidths. The resulting systematic errors by using incorrect linewidths have only been studied for a few selected cases which hint at a significant temperature error of up to 9 %. In this work we show a clear picture of the temperature and concentration errors resulting from incorrect linewidth data by evaluating the influence of S- vs. Q-branch linewidths in pure oxygen and self-broadening vs. accurate collisional environment in air and nitrogen-water vapor mixtures. The data show that the evaluated temperature is systematically too high by using Q-branch instead of S-branch linewidths in oxygen and nitrogen thermometry and a strong influence of the collisional environment on the temperature and species concentration determination.
拉曼线宽不合理导致RCARS诊断系统温度误差
相干反斯托克斯拉曼光谱(CARS)是气相和燃烧诊断中测温、主要物质检测和定量的标准。近年来,用于旋转CARS光谱的各种气体、混合气体和温度的经验s分支拉曼线宽数据库得到了显著的扩展。拉曼线宽对于从光谱信息中准确提取热力学信息至关重要。然而,不可用的旋转CARS评估的正确线宽数据通常由近似数据代替,例如,通过省略适当的碰撞环境或通过使用振动q分支线宽而不是旋转s分支线宽。由于使用不正确的线宽而产生的系统误差只在少数选定的情况下进行了研究,这些情况暗示了高达9%的显著温度误差。在这项工作中,我们通过评估纯氧和自展宽与空气和氮-水蒸气混合物中精确碰撞环境的S- vs. q分支线宽的影响,清楚地显示了由不正确的线宽数据引起的温度和浓度误差。数据表明,在氧氮测温中采用q支线宽代替s支线宽计算出的温度系统偏高,碰撞环境对温度和物质浓度的测定影响较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
420
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains forefront contributions in fundamentals and applications of combustion science. For more than 50 years, the Combustion Institute has served as the peak international society for dissemination of scientific and technical research in the combustion field. In addition to author submissions, the Proceedings of the Combustion Institute includes the Institute''s prestigious invited strategic and topical reviews that represent indispensable resources for emergent research in the field. All papers are subjected to rigorous peer review. Research papers and invited topical reviews; Reaction Kinetics; Soot, PAH, and other large molecules; Diagnostics; Laminar Flames; Turbulent Flames; Heterogeneous Combustion; Spray and Droplet Combustion; Detonations, Explosions & Supersonic Combustion; Fire Research; Stationary Combustion Systems; IC Engine and Gas Turbine Combustion; New Technology Concepts The electronic version of Proceedings of the Combustion Institute contains supplemental material such as reaction mechanisms, illustrating movies, and other data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信