Fisheries decision-makers’ perspectives on the use of historical data to inform assessment and management

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Ilse A. Martínez-Candelas , Alejandro Espinoza-Tenorio , Loren McClenachan
{"title":"Fisheries decision-makers’ perspectives on the use of historical data to inform assessment and management","authors":"Ilse A. Martínez-Candelas ,&nbsp;Alejandro Espinoza-Tenorio ,&nbsp;Loren McClenachan","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The lack of historical perspectives has hindered effective fisheries management. Historical data can help address shifted baselines in fisheries, but the process of integrating historical data into fisheries decision-making has not been clear in part because the data needs of decision-makers have not been assessed. Using Mexico as a case study, we conducted interviews with fisheries decision-makers to identify the current use of historical data, data needs, and pathways for integrating historical data into fisheries decision-making. We found that some historical data are currently used for decision-making, with the earliest archival data in use deriving from the 1850s. However, we also found that additional historical data existed for many fisheries that were not used, with an average of almost 30 years of data gap between the oldest data that exist and the oldest data used. Fisheries decision-makers described a need for six different types of historical information: catch, socioeconomic, biological, ecological, spatial and technological. Together respondents describe nine interrelated pathways to integrate historical data into fisheries decision-making both within and outside of the management structure, and identify 43 specific fisheries management contexts in which historical data would benefit decision-making. This research uses experts’ knowledge to illustrate how historical data can be used to improve fisheries management beyond the theoretical pathways and highlights the need for collaborative research to identify, collect, and apply the best available information in fisheries decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 107908"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125003709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of historical perspectives has hindered effective fisheries management. Historical data can help address shifted baselines in fisheries, but the process of integrating historical data into fisheries decision-making has not been clear in part because the data needs of decision-makers have not been assessed. Using Mexico as a case study, we conducted interviews with fisheries decision-makers to identify the current use of historical data, data needs, and pathways for integrating historical data into fisheries decision-making. We found that some historical data are currently used for decision-making, with the earliest archival data in use deriving from the 1850s. However, we also found that additional historical data existed for many fisheries that were not used, with an average of almost 30 years of data gap between the oldest data that exist and the oldest data used. Fisheries decision-makers described a need for six different types of historical information: catch, socioeconomic, biological, ecological, spatial and technological. Together respondents describe nine interrelated pathways to integrate historical data into fisheries decision-making both within and outside of the management structure, and identify 43 specific fisheries management contexts in which historical data would benefit decision-making. This research uses experts’ knowledge to illustrate how historical data can be used to improve fisheries management beyond the theoretical pathways and highlights the need for collaborative research to identify, collect, and apply the best available information in fisheries decision-making.
渔业决策者对利用历史数据为评估和管理提供信息的观点
缺乏历史观点阻碍了有效的渔业管理。历史数据可以帮助解决渔业基线变化的问题,但将历史数据纳入渔业决策的过程并不明确,部分原因是尚未评估决策者的数据需求。以墨西哥为例,我们对渔业决策者进行了访谈,以确定历史数据的当前使用情况、数据需求以及将历史数据整合到渔业决策中的途径。我们发现一些历史数据目前被用于决策,最早的档案数据来自19世纪50年代。然而,我们还发现,存在许多未使用的渔业的额外历史数据,存在的最古老数据与使用的最古老数据之间的平均数据差距接近30年。渔业决策者描述了对六种不同类型的历史信息的需求:捕获量、社会经济、生物、生态、空间和技术。受访者共同描述了将历史数据整合到管理结构内外的渔业决策中的九种相互关联的途径,并确定了43种具体的渔业管理环境,在这些环境中,历史数据将有利于决策。本研究利用专家的知识来说明如何利用历史数据超越理论途径来改善渔业管理,并强调需要进行合作研究,以识别、收集和应用渔业决策中可用的最佳信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信