EFFECT OF OBICETRAPIB ON NEW ONSET DIABETES IN PATIENTS WITH ELEVATED LDL-C RECEIVING MAXIMALLY TOLERATED STATIN THERAPY: POOLED ANALYSES OF THE BROADWAY AND BROOKLYN TRIALS

IF 5.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
John JP Kastelein MD, PhD , Kausik K Ray MD MPHil FMedSci , Michael Szarek PhD , Adam J Nelson MBBS PhD , Marc Ditmarsch MD , Douglas Kling MBA , Michael H Davidson MD , Stephen J Nicholls MBBS PhD
{"title":"EFFECT OF OBICETRAPIB ON NEW ONSET DIABETES IN PATIENTS WITH ELEVATED LDL-C RECEIVING MAXIMALLY TOLERATED STATIN THERAPY: POOLED ANALYSES OF THE BROADWAY AND BROOKLYN TRIALS","authors":"John JP Kastelein MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kausik K Ray MD MPHil FMedSci ,&nbsp;Michael Szarek PhD ,&nbsp;Adam J Nelson MBBS PhD ,&nbsp;Marc Ditmarsch MD ,&nbsp;Douglas Kling MBA ,&nbsp;Michael H Davidson MD ,&nbsp;Stephen J Nicholls MBBS PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.101134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Therapeutic Area</h3><div>Pharmacologic Therapy</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical and genetic studies indicate LDL-C lowering cardiovascular benefits proportional to LDL-C degree reduction, not by its mechanism achieved; however, LDL-C lowering effect on glycemic control and new onset diabetes (NoD) vary by intervention. Although genetics predict on-target effect on HMGCoA, NCP1L1 and PCSK9 lowering of NoD risk, this has only been observed in statin trials. Obicetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor (CETPi), reduces LDL-C, Lp(a) and raises apoA1/HDL-C. Metaanalyses of early CETPi trials demonstrated 16% lower NoD risk. Effects of obicetrapib on glycaemia and NoD risk are unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pooled analysis of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN trials which randomized ASCVD or HeFH patients with elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statins to Obicetrapib 10mg once daily or placebo for 1 year, were conducted. Obicetrapib’s day 84 and 365 HbA1c effects and NoD risk in patients without known baseline diabetic history and glycaemia strata (prediabetes, or normoglycemia), were assessed - adjusted for baseline Hba1c, trial and statin use. An additional updated meta-analysis of NoD risk with CETPi including obicetrapib data was performed, determining whether any observed associations were consistent with prior class-level observations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1848 patients, mean age 63.4, women 38.1%, 89.7% on statin were included with baseline median LDLC, 96 mg/dl (IQR 78-126), HbA1c 5.7% (5.4%-5.9%). Placebo-corrected LDL-C, Lp(a), and HDL-C median changes were -35.3%, -35.6%, and +136.7% (all P &lt; 0.0001. Post-baseline HbA1c was lower with Obicetrapib vs Placebo, p &lt;0.0297), consistent by glycemia stratum (Figure). Treatment HR for NoD was 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04), p=0.09 (Figure) with consistent trends in those within normoglycemia and prediabetes (Figure). The additional updated meta-analysis, including obicetrapib data from 4 prior large RCTS, produced an overall RR for NoD of 0.83 (CI 0.77-0.90), 13.5%, p-value for heterogeneity 0.493, consistent with CETPi overall class effect</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Obicetrapib reduced HbA1c trending towards lower risk of NoD in prediabetic and normoglycemic patients at baseline. Although obicetrapib led to greater LDL-C reductions than other CETPi, Obicetrapib effects on NoD were consistent with other CETPi. As risk of NoD accrues over time, larger, longer trials are needed to determine full degree of potential protective effects of obicetrapib on NoD risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101134"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725002090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapeutic Area

Pharmacologic Therapy

Background

Clinical and genetic studies indicate LDL-C lowering cardiovascular benefits proportional to LDL-C degree reduction, not by its mechanism achieved; however, LDL-C lowering effect on glycemic control and new onset diabetes (NoD) vary by intervention. Although genetics predict on-target effect on HMGCoA, NCP1L1 and PCSK9 lowering of NoD risk, this has only been observed in statin trials. Obicetrapib, a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor (CETPi), reduces LDL-C, Lp(a) and raises apoA1/HDL-C. Metaanalyses of early CETPi trials demonstrated 16% lower NoD risk. Effects of obicetrapib on glycaemia and NoD risk are unknown.

Methods

Pooled analysis of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN trials which randomized ASCVD or HeFH patients with elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statins to Obicetrapib 10mg once daily or placebo for 1 year, were conducted. Obicetrapib’s day 84 and 365 HbA1c effects and NoD risk in patients without known baseline diabetic history and glycaemia strata (prediabetes, or normoglycemia), were assessed - adjusted for baseline Hba1c, trial and statin use. An additional updated meta-analysis of NoD risk with CETPi including obicetrapib data was performed, determining whether any observed associations were consistent with prior class-level observations.

Results

1848 patients, mean age 63.4, women 38.1%, 89.7% on statin were included with baseline median LDLC, 96 mg/dl (IQR 78-126), HbA1c 5.7% (5.4%-5.9%). Placebo-corrected LDL-C, Lp(a), and HDL-C median changes were -35.3%, -35.6%, and +136.7% (all P < 0.0001. Post-baseline HbA1c was lower with Obicetrapib vs Placebo, p <0.0297), consistent by glycemia stratum (Figure). Treatment HR for NoD was 0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04), p=0.09 (Figure) with consistent trends in those within normoglycemia and prediabetes (Figure). The additional updated meta-analysis, including obicetrapib data from 4 prior large RCTS, produced an overall RR for NoD of 0.83 (CI 0.77-0.90), 13.5%, p-value for heterogeneity 0.493, consistent with CETPi overall class effect

Conclusions

Obicetrapib reduced HbA1c trending towards lower risk of NoD in prediabetic and normoglycemic patients at baseline. Although obicetrapib led to greater LDL-C reductions than other CETPi, Obicetrapib effects on NoD were consistent with other CETPi. As risk of NoD accrues over time, larger, longer trials are needed to determine full degree of potential protective effects of obicetrapib on NoD risk.
obicetrapib对接受最大耐受他汀类药物治疗的ldl-c升高患者新发糖尿病的影响:Broadway和brooklyn试验的汇总分析
临床和遗传学研究表明,降低LDL-C对心血管的益处与降低LDL-C程度成正比,而不是通过其机制实现的;然而,LDL-C降低对血糖控制和新发糖尿病(NoD)的影响因干预而异。虽然遗传学预测HMGCoA、NCP1L1和PCSK9的靶标效应降低NoD风险,但这只在他汀类药物试验中观察到。Obicetrapib是一种胆固醇酯转移蛋白抑制剂(CETPi),可降低LDL-C, Lp(a)并提高apoA1/HDL-C。早期CETPi试验的荟萃分析显示NoD风险降低16%。obicetrapib对血糖和NoD风险的影响尚不清楚。方法对LDL-C升高的ASCVD或HeFH患者进行BROADWAY和BROOKLYN试验的随机分析,尽管他汀类药物对Obicetrapib 10mg每日一次或安慰剂耐受1年。评估了Obicetrapib在基线糖尿病史和血糖水平(糖尿病前期或血糖正常)未知的患者中第84天和第365天的HbA1c效果和NoD风险,并根据基线HbA1c、试验和他汀类药物的使用进行了调整。对CETPi的NoD风险进行了另一项更新的荟萃分析,包括obicetrapib数据,以确定是否有任何观察到的关联与先前的类水平观察结果一致。结果纳入1848例患者,平均年龄63.4岁,女性38.1%,89.7%接受他汀类药物治疗,基线中位ldl为96 mg/dl (IQR 78-126), HbA1c为5.7%(5.4%-5.9%)。经安慰剂校正的LDL-C、Lp(a)和HDL-C的中位变化分别为-35.3%、-35.6%和+136.7% (P <均为0.0001)。Obicetrapib组基线后HbA1c低于安慰剂组(p <0.0297),与血糖水平一致(图)。NoD的治疗HR为0.77 (95% CI 0.57-1.04), p=0.09(图),血糖正常和前驱糖尿病患者的趋势一致(图)。另一项更新的荟萃分析,包括来自先前4项大型随机对照试验的obicetrapib数据,得出NoD的总体RR为0.83 (CI 0.77-0.90), 13.5%,异质性p值为0.493,与CETPi总体分类效应一致。结论sobicetrapib在基线时降低糖尿病前期和血糖正常患者的HbA1c,倾向于降低NoD的风险。尽管obicetrapib比其他CETPi更能降低LDL-C,但obicetrapib对NoD的影响与其他CETPi一致。由于NoD的风险随着时间的推移而增加,需要更大规模、更长期的试验来确定obicetrapib对NoD风险的潜在保护作用的全部程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信